What is the primary objective of **PDPA**?

**The primary objective of PDPA is to govern the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data by organisations while balancing individuals’ rights to protect their data and organisations’ needs for reasonable purposes.** Singapore’s **Personal Data Protection Act 2012**, administered by the **PDPC**, operational since 2 July 2014 with amendments effective from 1 February 2021, enforces nine core obligations including consent, notification, access/correction, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, breach notification (Part 6A), and Do Not Call provisions. Thailand’s PDPA (effective 1 June 2022) and Taiwan’s (effective 15 March 2016) similarly protect personal data through lawful processing, transparency, security, and data subject rights.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PDPA**?

**All organisations collecting, using, or disclosing personal data of residents are required to comply with PDPA, including controllers and processors with extraterritorial reach.** Singapore regulates private sector organisations and data intermediaries; exemptions apply to public agencies and business contact information. Thailand mandates controllers determining purposes/means and processors acting on instructions, applying to foreign entities processing Thai residents’ data. Taiwan covers government/non-government agencies and commissioned parties handling identifiable data like NRIC or health records.

Does **PDPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PDPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires organisations to demonstrate accountability through internal policies, DPO appointment, and reasonable security measures.** Singapore’s PDPC expects a Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP) with self-assessments like PATO; Thailand mandates DPOs for thresholds (e.g., 100,000 data subjects); Taiwan requires risk assessments and security personnel per Enforcement Rules.

How often should an assessment for **PDPA** be performed?

**PDPA assessments should be performed continuously with periodic reviews, such as annual data inventories, quarterly internal audits, and DPIAs for high-risk processing.** Singapore PDPC guidance recommends ongoing DPMP maintenance, breach register reviews (two years), and access reviews; Thailand requires security measure reviews; Taiwan Enforcement Rules specify audit mechanisms and continuous improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PDPA**?

**Non-compliance with PDPA results in financial penalties, enforcement orders, and potential criminal liability.** Singapore imposes fines up to **SGD 1 million**; Thailand up to **THB 5 million** administrative fines, THB 3 million for late breach notification, and director imprisonment; Taiwan includes fines up to **TWD 1 million** and up to five years imprisonment for intentional violations.

Can **PDPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, PDPA cannot be directly mapped as it comprises jurisdiction-specific statutes (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan) with unique mechanics like deemed consent (Singapore) and agency models (Taiwan).**

What is the first step to begin implementing **PDPA**?

**The first step to implement PDPA is to appoint a DPO and conduct a comprehensive data inventory and gap assessment.** Singapore requires DPO designation with senior reporting; map personal data flows, purposes, and processors using PDPC templates for a risk-prioritised DPMP.

What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through enterprise governance and management (EGIT).** COBIT 2019 provides a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by **six governance system principles** and **seven components** (processes, structures, etc.). It uses a **goals cascade** to translate stakeholder needs into enterprise goals, alignment goals, and actionable practices.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework maintained by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises needing structured EGIT, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities, where boards and executives use it to demonstrate governance over I&T for audit, risk management, and value delivery.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, unlike ISO standards.** Organizations perform internal capability assessments using the **CMMI-based performance management model** (levels 0-5). **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supports voluntary assurance activities, often integrated with internal audits.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically, aligned with the dynamic governance principle, typically annually or after significant changes.** Use the **COBIT Performance Management (CPM)** approach to evaluate capability levels (0-5) for prioritized objectives, incorporating design factors like strategy shifts or threat landscape updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a non-mandatory framework.** Indirect consequences include weakened EGIT, higher I&T-related risks, audit findings in regulated environments, and suboptimal value from IT initiatives due to unaddressed gaps in the **40 objectives** or **goals cascade**.

Can **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles emphasizing alignment.** Its **openness and flexibility** enable integration as an umbrella model, using design factors and the core model to harmonize with operational standards through crosswalks and shared components.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using the goals cascade and 11 design factors.** Assess stakeholder needs, current capabilities, and digital maturity (per **APO02 Managed Strategy**), then apply the governance system design workflow and toolkit to define a tailored scope of objectives and target capability levels.

PDPA vs COBIT | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

PDPA

Mandatory

2012

Singapore regulation for personal data protection

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Framework for enterprise IT governance and management.

Quick Verdict

PDPA mandates personal data protection compliance across Asian jurisdictions with fines and enforcement, while COBIT provides voluntary IT governance framework for aligning technology with business goals through tailored objectives and maturity assessments.

Data Privacy

PDPA

Personal Data Protection Act 2012

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandatory Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointment
72-hour data breach notification obligation
Deemed consent and legitimate interest exceptions
Cross-border transfer limitation with safeguards
Do Not Call Registry for marketing controls

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
11 design factors for tailored governance systems
Goals cascade linking stakeholders to IT outcomes
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
7 components including processes and culture

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

PDPA Details

What It Is

Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA) is Singapore's principal regulation governing collection, use, disclosure, and protection of personal data by organizations. It balances individual privacy rights with legitimate business needs through a principles-based, risk-proportionate approach covering scope, consent, security, and accountability.

Key Components

Nine core obligations: consent, notification, access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, breach notification.
Mandatory DPO appointment and Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP).
Built on reasonableness and proportionality principles.
No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment, audits, PDPC enforcement.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal compliance to avoid fines up to SGD 1M or 10% global revenue.
Risk mitigation for breaches, enhancing cyber resilience.
Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access, supports innovation.
Strategic advantages in data-driven sectors like finance, healthcare.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance setup, data mapping/DPIAs, policy/controls, training, monitoring. Applies to all Singapore organizations handling personal data; scalable for SMEs to enterprises. PDPC guidance, tools like PATO aid execution; ongoing audits ensure sustainability. (178 words)

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology, is a comprehensive governance framework developed by ISACA for enterprise information and technology (I&T). Its primary purpose is to align I&T with business goals, manage risks, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system. It uses a design-factor-driven approach emphasizing outcomes via 40 objectives across five domains.

Key Components

**Five domainsEDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
40 governance and management objectives with practices and metrics.
Six governance principles and seven components (processes, structures, culture, etc.).
CMMI-based performance management (levels 0-5); no formal certification, but capability assessments.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives value creation, risk optimization, and compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR mappings).
Enhances audit readiness and stakeholder trust.
Supports digital transformation and integration with ITIL, NIST.

Implementation Overview

**Phased design workflowAssess gaps, tailor via 11 design factors, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
Suited for medium-large enterprises across industries; requires training (COBIT certifications).

Key Differences

Aspect	PDPA	COBIT
Scope	Personal data protection in Asia (SG, TH, TW)	Enterprise IT governance and management
Industry	All sectors in specific Asian countries	All industries worldwide, any size
Nature	Mandatory national privacy laws/regulations	Voluntary IT governance framework
Testing	Regulator enforcement, no formal certification	Capability assessments, maturity audits
Penalties	Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal sanctions	No penalties, loss of governance maturity

Scope

PDPA

Personal data protection in Asia (SG, TH, TW)

COBIT

Enterprise IT governance and management

Industry

PDPA

All sectors in specific Asian countries

COBIT

All industries worldwide, any size

Nature

PDPA

Mandatory national privacy laws/regulations

COBIT

Voluntary IT governance framework

Testing

PDPA

Regulator enforcement, no formal certification

COBIT

Capability assessments, maturity audits

Penalties

PDPA

Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal sanctions

COBIT

No penalties, loss of governance maturity

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about PDPA and COBIT

PDPA FAQ

COBIT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISA 95 vs CMMI

Compare ISA 95 vs CMMI: ISA-95 standardizes ERP-MES integration via Purdue levels & activity models; CMMI advances process maturity from chaotic to optimizing. Choose wisely for peak manufacturing performance!

ISO 27001 vs ISO 14001

Compare ISO 27001 vs ISO 14001: ISMS for cyber resilience vs EMS for sustainability. Key differences, benefits, and implementation guide. Choose wisely for compliance success!

HITRUST CSF vs CAA

Compare HITRUST CSF vs CAA: Uncover key differences in controls, maturity scoring, risk tailoring & assurance (e1/i1/r2). Streamline compliance, cut risks—find your best fit now!

PDPA

COBIT

Quick Verdict

PDPA

Key Features

COBIT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

PDPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

PDPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of PDPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PDPA?

Does PDPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PDPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PDPA?

Can PDPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PDPA?

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

Can COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISA 95 vs CMMI

ISO 27001 vs ISO 14001

HITRUST CSF vs CAA