PDPA
Singapore regulation for private sector personal data protection
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
PDPA mandates data protection for Singapore organizations via consent and breach rules, while ISO 13485 certifies medical device QMS for lifecycle safety. Companies adopt PDPA for legal compliance, ISO 13485 for market access and quality assurance.
PDPA
Personal Data Protection Act 2012
Key Features
- Mandates empowered Data Protection Officer appointment
- Requires risk-based Data Protection Management Programme
- Enforces 72-hour breach notification for significant harm
- Provides deemed consent for business improvement purposes
- Demands reasonable security and transfer safeguards
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based controls for device safety and compliance
- Design and development validation requirements
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing oversight
- Process validation and traceability mandates
- Post-market surveillance and CAPA processes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PDPA Details
What It Is
Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA) is Singapore's principal legislation regulating personal data collection, use, disclosure, and protection in the private sector. It adopts a principles-based, risk-focused approach balancing individual privacy rights with organizational needs, administered by the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC).
Key Components
- Nine core obligations: consent, notification, access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, and breach notification.
- Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP) framework with governance, policies, processes, and maintenance.
- Mandatory DPO appointment; emphasizes DPIAs, data inventories, and vendor oversight.
Why Organizations Use It
PDPA compliance mitigates fines up to S$1M or 10% global revenue, reduces breach risks, and builds stakeholder trust. It enables data-driven innovation via privacy-by-design, strengthens partnerships, and lowers operational costs through efficient data governance.
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: baseline assessment, DPMP establishment, data mapping/DPIAs, technical/contractual controls, training, and continuous audits. Applies to all private sector entities handling Singapore personal data; no certification but PDPC tools like PATO aid self-assessment.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a risk-based framework for QMS tailored to medical device lifecycle stages, from design to post-market surveillance, emphasizing regulatory compliance and patient safety.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8 covering QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
- Requires documented procedures, medical device files, risk management (linked to ISO 14971), validation, traceability, and CAPA.
- Built on process approach; certification via accredited bodies with stage 1/2 audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces risks/recalls.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supply chain assurance, operational efficiency.
- Strategic for scaling, M&A, and regulatory convergence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally; 9–36 months typical.
- Involves eQMS, training, internal audits for certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PDPA | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, consent, breach notification | Medical device QMS, design, production, post-market |
| Industry | All private sector, Singapore-focused, SMEs to enterprises | Medical devices globally, manufacturers and suppliers |
| Nature | Mandatory regulation with fines, PDPC enforcement | Voluntary certification standard for regulatory compliance |
| Testing | Self-assessments, DPIAs, breach simulations | Internal audits, certification audits, process validation |
| Penalties | Fines up to S$1M or 10% revenue, enforcement actions | Loss of certification, regulatory non-conformance |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PDPA and ISO 13485
PDPA FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
J-SOX vs GDPR UK
J-SOX vs UK GDPR: Japan's financial controls meet UK data privacy laws. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & tips for multinationals. Master global regs now!
SQF vs AS9120B
SQF vs AS9120B: Compare GFSI food safety cert (HACCP modules, supply chain) with aerospace QMS (traceability, counterfeit prevention). Choose the right standard for compliance success!
SAMA CSF vs ISO 30301
Compare SAMA CSF vs ISO 30301: Key frameworks for Saudi financial cyber resilience & records governance. Master maturity models, compliance & strategy. Discover differences now!