Standards Comparison

    PDPA

    Mandatory
    2012

    Southeast Asia's principles-based personal data protection acts

    VS

    ISO 26000

    Voluntary
    2010

    International guidance standard for social responsibility.

    Quick Verdict

    PDPA mandates data protection compliance across Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan for privacy rights and breach response, while ISO 26000 offers voluntary social responsibility guidance on ethics, environment and governance. Companies adopt PDPA for legal compliance, ISO 26000 for strategic sustainability.

    Data Privacy

    PDPA

    Personal Data Protection Act 2012

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Principles-based framework balancing privacy and business needs
    • Mandatory Data Protection Officer appointment
    • Structured 72-hour breach notification regime
    • Consent with deemed exceptions and withdrawal
    • Cross-border transfer safeguards and limitations
    Social Responsibility

    ISO 26000

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Seven core subjects for holistic SR coverage
    • Seven principles as cross-cutting decision norms
    • Non-certifiable guidance for all organizations
    • Stakeholder engagement for materiality prioritization
    • Integration with management systems like ISO 14001

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PDPA Details

    What It Is

    PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act), notably Singapore's 2012 Act and variants in Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, is a family of principles-based regulations governing personal data collection, use, disclosure by organizations. Primary purpose: protect individuals' data while enabling reasonable business processing. Scope covers private sector organizations handling identifiable data; employs risk-based, operational approach with consent, exceptions, accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core obligations: notification, consent (or exceptions), access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer controls, breach response, accountability.
    • 9-10 key obligations across regimes; built on GDPR-like principles but with local nuances like deemed consent, DPO requirements.
    • Compliance via Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP); no universal certification, enforced by PDPCs.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory legal compliance to avoid fines (up to SGD 1M, THB 5M).
    • Risk mitigation for breaches, transfers; builds trust, enables data-driven innovation.
    • Strategic advantages: market access, partnerships, efficiency via data governance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, training, audits.
    • Applies to all sizes in covered jurisdictions; involves DPO appointment, DPIAs, vendor contracts.
    • No certification but PDPC guidance, self-assessments like PATO; ongoing via DPMP.

    ISO 26000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides non-certifiable framework for organizations to integrate SR into operations. Scope covers all organization types, sizes, and locations, using a holistic, stakeholder-driven approach focused on impacts, risks, and sustainable development.

    Key Components

    • Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
    • Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholders, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
    • Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; no requirements, thus voluntary adoption without certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances credibility, manages risks, aligns with SDGs/OECD/GRI. Builds stakeholder trust, improves resilience, unlocks market access, supports ESG reporting. Addresses regulatory pressures like human rights due diligence.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: assess materiality, engage stakeholders, integrate into governance/management systems (e.g., ISO 14001), train staff, report transparently. Applicable universally; self-assessment via KPIs, no audits required.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    PDPA
    Personal data protection, processing, rights
    ISO 26000
    Social responsibility, 7 core subjects broadly

    Industry

    PDPA
    All organizations in PDPA jurisdictions
    ISO 26000
    All organizations globally, all sectors

    Nature

    PDPA
    Mandatory statutes with enforcement
    ISO 26000
    Voluntary non-certifiable guidance

    Testing

    PDPA
    PDPC audits, breach assessments
    ISO 26000
    Self-assessment, no formal testing

    Penalties

    PDPA
    Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal
    ISO 26000
    No penalties, reputational only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PDPA and ISO 26000

    PDPA FAQ

    ISO 26000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages