PDPA
Southeast Asia's principles-based personal data protection acts
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility.
Quick Verdict
PDPA mandates data protection compliance across Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan for privacy rights and breach response, while ISO 26000 offers voluntary social responsibility guidance on ethics, environment and governance. Companies adopt PDPA for legal compliance, ISO 26000 for strategic sustainability.
PDPA
Personal Data Protection Act 2012
Key Features
- Principles-based framework balancing privacy and business needs
- Mandatory Data Protection Officer appointment
- Structured 72-hour breach notification regime
- Consent with deemed exceptions and withdrawal
- Cross-border transfer safeguards and limitations
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven core subjects for holistic SR coverage
- Seven principles as cross-cutting decision norms
- Non-certifiable guidance for all organizations
- Stakeholder engagement for materiality prioritization
- Integration with management systems like ISO 14001
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PDPA Details
What It Is
PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act), notably Singapore's 2012 Act and variants in Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, is a family of principles-based regulations governing personal data collection, use, disclosure by organizations. Primary purpose: protect individuals' data while enabling reasonable business processing. Scope covers private sector organizations handling identifiable data; employs risk-based, operational approach with consent, exceptions, accountability.
Key Components
- Core obligations: notification, consent (or exceptions), access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer controls, breach response, accountability.
- 9-10 key obligations across regimes; built on GDPR-like principles but with local nuances like deemed consent, DPO requirements.
- Compliance via Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP); no universal certification, enforced by PDPCs.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory legal compliance to avoid fines (up to SGD 1M, THB 5M).
- Risk mitigation for breaches, transfers; builds trust, enables data-driven innovation.
- Strategic advantages: market access, partnerships, efficiency via data governance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, training, audits.
- Applies to all sizes in covered jurisdictions; involves DPO appointment, DPIAs, vendor contracts.
- No certification but PDPC guidance, self-assessments like PATO; ongoing via DPMP.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides non-certifiable framework for organizations to integrate SR into operations. Scope covers all organization types, sizes, and locations, using a holistic, stakeholder-driven approach focused on impacts, risks, and sustainable development.
Key Components
- Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholders, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; no requirements, thus voluntary adoption without certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances credibility, manages risks, aligns with SDGs/OECD/GRI. Builds stakeholder trust, improves resilience, unlocks market access, supports ESG reporting. Addresses regulatory pressures like human rights due diligence.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess materiality, engage stakeholders, integrate into governance/management systems (e.g., ISO 14001), train staff, report transparently. Applicable universally; self-assessment via KPIs, no audits required.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PDPA | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, processing, rights | Social responsibility, 7 core subjects broadly |
| Industry | All organizations in PDPA jurisdictions | All organizations globally, all sectors |
| Nature | Mandatory statutes with enforcement | Voluntary non-certifiable guidance |
| Testing | PDPC audits, breach assessments | Self-assessment, no formal testing |
| Penalties | Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal | No penalties, reputational only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PDPA and ISO 26000
PDPA FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs ISO 37001
PCI DSS vs ISO 37001: Compare payment security & anti-bribery standards. Key differences, benefits, implementation tips for compliance. Protect your biz—read now!
TISAX vs Basel III
Explore TISAX vs Basel III: Automotive cybersecurity vs banking capital rules. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for supply chain & financial resilience. Dive in!
NIS2 vs APRA CPS 234
Compare NIS2 vs APRA CPS 234: EU cyber resilience directive meets Australia's financial security standard. Uncover scopes, reporting (24-72h vs 72h), fines & compliance strategies. Achieve global readiness now.