What is the primary objective of **PDPA**?

**The primary objective of PDPA is to govern the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data by organisations while balancing individuals’ right to protect their data and organisations’ need to process it for reasonable purposes.** Singapore’s **PDPA 2012**, administered by the **PDPC**, operational since 2 July 2014 with amendments effective from 1 February 2021, enforces this through nine core obligations: consent, notification, access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, and breach notification (Part 6A). Thailand’s PDPA (effective 1 June 2022) and Taiwan’s PDPA similarly protect personal data via principles like lawful processing, transparency, security, and data subject rights.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PDPA**?

**All organisations collecting, using, or disclosing personal data of residents in applicable jurisdictions must comply with PDPA.** Singapore’s PDPA applies to private sector organisations in Singapore; Thailand’s PDPA has extraterritorial reach to entities processing Thai residents’ data; Taiwan’s PDPA regulates government and non-government agencies handling Taiwanese nationals’ data. Controllers determine purposes/means; processors (data intermediaries in Singapore, explicit in Thailand) bear direct liability for security and transfers. DPO appointment is mandatory in Singapore, threshold-based in Thailand (e.g., 100,000+ data subjects).

Does **PDPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PDPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Singapore’s principles-based regime relies on internal accountability via **DPMP** and PDPC guidance like PATO self-assessments. Thailand and Taiwan emphasise demonstrable security measures (e.g., risk assessments, logs) but lack certification requirements. Organisations must enable PDPC inspections; voluntary certifications (e.g., APEC CBPR) support cross-border transfers.

How often should an assessment for **PDPA** be performed?

**PDPA assessments should be performed continuously with periodic reviews, such as annually or upon material changes.** Singapore PDPC guidance recommends ongoing **DPMP** maintenance, quarterly internal audits, and DPIAs for high-risk processing. Thailand requires periodic security measure reviews; Taiwan’s Enforcement Rules mandate continuous improvement via audits and risk assessments. Maintain living data inventories and breach registers (e.g., two-year retention).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PDPA**?

**Non-compliance with PDPA incurs financial penalties, enforcement orders, and potential criminal liability.** Singapore imposes fines up to **SGD 1 million**; Thailand up to **THB 5 million** administrative fines, plus criminal sanctions and director liability; Taiwan includes imprisonment up to five years and fines up to **TWD 1 million**. Delayed breach notifications (e.g., Thailand’s 72-hour rule) add fines up to **THB 3 million**, plus remediation orders and reputational harm.

Can **PDPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, PDPA cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks in these FAQs.** PDPA regimes (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan) feature jurisdiction-specific mechanics like Singapore’s deemed consent, Thailand’s DPO thresholds, and Taiwan’s agency model, requiring standalone compliance programmes.

What is the first step to begin implementing **PDPA**?

**The first step to implement PDPA is to appoint a DPO and conduct a comprehensive data inventory and gap assessment.** Secure executive sponsorship, map personal data flows, purposes, and processors using PDPC templates, then prioritise DPIAs for high-risk activities like transfers and sensitive data.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27017**?

**ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 additional cloud-focused controls (CLD.6.3.1, CLD.8.1.5, CLD.9.5.1, CLD.9.5.2, CLD.12.1.5, CLD.12.4.5, CLD.13.1.4).** Published in 2015, it addresses shared responsibilities between **cloud service providers (CSPs)** and **cloud service customers (CSCs)**, covering multi-tenancy segregation, virtual machine hardening, asset removal/return, administrative operations security, customer monitoring, and virtual network alignment. It integrates into an **ISO 27001 ISMS** to manage cloud risks like data remanence and isolation in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27017**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 27017, as it is a voluntary code of practice.** Professionally, **CSPs** and **CSCs** with significant cloud footprints adopt it to demonstrate due diligence, especially in regulated sectors or procurement demanding cloud security assurance. It is essential for those integrating it into an **ISO 27001 ISMS** to address cloud-specific risks, with ~94% cloud adoption driving market expectations.

Does **ISO 27017** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27017 does not support standalone third-party certification or require external audits.** It is assessed as an extension within an **ISO 27001 certification audit**, where bodies evaluate implementation of its 37 extended controls and 7 CLD controls alongside the ISMS. Certificates often reference ISO 27017 conformity as an add-on.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27017** be performed?

**ISO 27017 assessments occur as part of annual ISO 27001 surveillance audits and triennial recertification.** Controls must be reviewed during **ISMS management reviews**, with continuous monitoring recommended for cloud operations like logging and configurations. Revisions align with ISO 27001 cycles, typically annually for ongoing effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27017**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27017 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect risks include failed **ISO 27001 audits**, lost procurement opportunities, heightened breach exposure from unaddressed cloud risks (e.g., 61% of organizations report cloud incidents), and regulatory scrutiny under data laws if cloud gaps contribute to violations.

Can **ISO 27017** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**ISO 27017 cannot be standalone mapped, but its controls integrate seamlessly into ISO 27001 ISMS.** The 37 ISO 27002 extensions and 7 CLD controls align with updated **ISO 27002:2022** structures, enabling risk-based adaptation without independent cross-framework mapping.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27017**?

**Conduct a cloud-specific risk assessment within your ISO 27001 ISMS scope.** Identify cloud risks (e.g., shared responsibilities, multi-tenancy), select relevant 37 guidance controls and 7 CLD controls, then update the **Statement of Applicability** to delineate CSP/CSC duties.

PDPA vs ISO 27017

Standards Comparison

PDPA

Mandatory

2012

Singapore regulation for personal data protection compliance

ISO 27017

Voluntary

2015

International code of practice for cloud security controls

Quick Verdict

PDPA mandates personal data protection in SE Asia with fines and breach rules, while ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud security guidance. Companies adopt PDPA for legal compliance in Singapore/Thailand; ISO 27017 enhances ISO 27001 for cloud assurance.

Data Privacy

PDPA

Singapore Personal Data Protection Act 2012

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Balances individuals' privacy rights with organizations' needs
Requires appointment of Data Protection Officer
Mandatory data breach notification regime
Includes Do Not Call provisions for marketing
Enforces cross-border transfer limitations

Cloud Security

ISO 27017

ISO/IEC 27017:2015

Cost

€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
Introduces 7 additional cloud-specific CLD controls
Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 cloud adaptations
Ensures multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

PDPA Details

What It Is

PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act 2012) is Singapore's principles-based regulation governing collection, use, and disclosure of personal data by organizations. Administered by PDPC, it balances individual privacy rights with legitimate business needs through a risk-based approach featuring nine core obligations.

Key Components

Core obligations: consent/notification, access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, openness, breach notification.
Do Not Call Registry for marketing.
Mandatory Data Protection Officer (DPO).
Compliance via Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP); no formal certification but self-assessments like PATO.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate avoids fines up to SGD 1 million or 10% annual turnover.
Enhances trust, reduces breach risks, supports data-driven innovation.
Enables market access, partnerships; builds reputation in competitive sectors.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance/DPO setup, data mapping/DPIAs, policies/controls/training, breach readiness/audits.
Applies to all private organizations handling Singapore personal data; scalable by size/risk.
Emphasizes operational DPMP with continuous monitoring.

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for cloud services within a ISO 27001 ISMS, using a risk-based approach to address shared responsibilities and unique cloud risks.

Key Components

Additional guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls tailored to cloud environments
7 new CLD cloud-specific controls covering responsibility delineation, VM configuration, multi-tenancy segregation, monitoring, and asset termination
Builds on ISO 27001 ISMS framework
Integrated assessment model via ISO 27001 audits, no standalone certification

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates cloud risks like multi-tenancy and shared responsibilities
Supports regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) and procurement demands
Enhances risk management through operational maturity in logging and hardening
Builds customer trust and competitive edge for CSPs and CSCs
Provides auditable evidence for stakeholder assurance

Implementation Overview

Integrate into existing ISO 27001 via risk assessment and control mapping
Key activities: define shared responsibilities, implement segregation/monitoring, update SoA
Applies globally to CSPs/CSCs of all sizes, especially cloud-heavy operations
Audited jointly with ISO 27001 (typically 9-12 months combined)

Key Differences

Aspect	PDPA	ISO 27017
Scope	Personal data protection in SE Asia jurisdictions	Cloud-specific information security controls
Industry	All sectors in Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan	Cloud providers and customers globally
Nature	Mandatory national privacy laws	Voluntary ISO guidance standard
Testing	Regulatory enforcement and audits	ISO 27001 audits with cloud extensions
Penalties	Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal sanctions	No legal penalties, certification loss

Scope

PDPA

Personal data protection in SE Asia jurisdictions

ISO 27017

Cloud-specific information security controls

Industry

PDPA

All sectors in Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan

ISO 27017

Cloud providers and customers globally

Nature

PDPA

Mandatory national privacy laws

ISO 27017

Voluntary ISO guidance standard

Testing

PDPA

Regulatory enforcement and audits

ISO 27017

ISO 27001 audits with cloud extensions

Penalties

PDPA

Fines up to SGD1M/THB5M, criminal sanctions

ISO 27017

No legal penalties, certification loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about PDPA and ISO 27017

PDPA FAQ

ISO 27017 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APPI vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

Compare APPI vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—Japan's data privacy law meets global AI governance. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & synergies for secure innovation. (152 characters)

CMMC vs ISO 17025

Compare CMMC vs ISO 17025: DoD cybersecurity tiers meet lab competence standards. Uncover key differences, compliance paths & strategies for DIB contractors & labs. Secure your edge now!

PDPA vs ISO 19600

Discover PDPA vs ISO 19600: Compare Singapore's data privacy law with global compliance guidelines. Unlock strategies for governance, risk mitigation & integration. Align your org now!

PDPA

ISO 27017

Quick Verdict

PDPA

Key Features

ISO 27017

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

PDPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

PDPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of PDPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PDPA?

Does PDPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PDPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PDPA?

Can PDPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PDPA?

ISO 27017 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27017?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27017?

Does ISO 27017 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27017 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27017?

Can ISO 27017 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27017?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APPI vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

CMMC vs ISO 17025

PDPA vs ISO 19600