Standards Comparison

    PIPL

    Mandatory
    2021

    China's comprehensive regulation for personal information protection

    VS

    FedRAMP

    Mandatory
    2011

    U.S. government program standardizing cloud security authorization

    Quick Verdict

    PIPL mandates privacy protections for China data flows globally, requiring consent and transfers controls. FedRAMP authorizes secure US federal cloud services via NIST assessments. Companies adopt PIPL for China market access, FedRAMP for government contracts.

    Data Privacy

    PIPL

    Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial scope targeting China individuals
    • Consent-first basis without legitimate interests
    • Tiered cross-border transfer thresholds and mechanisms
    • Explicit separate consent for sensitive PI
    • Fines up to 5% annual revenue
    Cloud Security

    FedRAMP

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Assess once, use many times across agencies
    • NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines at impact levels
    • Independent third-party 3PAO assessments required
    • Continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables
    • FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSP visibility

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PIPL Details

    What It Is

    PIPL (Personal Information Protection Law), enacted August 2021 and effective November 2021, is China's comprehensive national regulation governing personal information processing. It protects natural persons' rights, standardizes collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion by domestic/foreign organizations. Adopts risk-based approach with strict consent defaults, intersecting Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law.

    Key Components

    • Eight chapters, 74 articles covering processing rules, cross-border transfers, individual rights, handler obligations.
    • Core principles: lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accountability.
    • Sensitive PI (biometrics, health, minors<14) requires explicit consent; seven legal bases, no legitimate interests.
    • **Compliance modelself-assessments (PIPIAs), CAC security reviews, SCCs/certification for transfers; no central certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for China operations or targeting; avoids fines up to 5% revenue or RMB 50M.
    • Enables market access, builds trust, reduces breach risks, supports global data flows.
    • Strategic resilience, competitive edge in China's digital economy.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased framework: gap analysis, data mapping, policies, controls, ongoing audits. Applies universally, especially multinationals/e-commerce; scales by size. Involves DPO appointment, training, vendor contracts; CAC filings for large transfers. (178 words)

    FedRAMP Details

    What It Is

    FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud service offerings (CSOs) used by federal agencies. Its core premise, "assess once, use many times," employs a risk-based approach aligned with NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls and FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).

    Key Components

    • Baselines: Low (~150-156 controls), Moderate (>320), High (>400), Low-Tailored/LI-SaaS (70+75 attested)
    • Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans
    • Independent 3PAO assessments; Agency/Program authorization paths
    • Built on NIST standards with FedRAMP overlays

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Unlocks federal contracts ($20M+ potential) and CMMC compliance
    • Enables market access, revenue growth, competitive differentiation
    • Reduces risk duplication, builds stakeholder trust via Marketplace listing

    Implementation Overview

    • 12-18 months typical: categorization, documentation, 3PAO audit, monitoring setup
    • Targets CSPs for U.S. federal cloud market; high resource needs, voluntary but essential for procurement

    Key Differences

    Scope

    PIPL
    Personal info collection, processing, transfers
    FedRAMP
    Cloud security assessment, authorization

    Industry

    PIPL
    All sectors, China extraterritorial
    FedRAMP
    Cloud providers, US federal agencies

    Nature

    PIPL
    Mandatory national privacy law
    FedRAMP
    Standardized authorization program

    Testing

    PIPL
    DPIAs, security reviews by CAC
    FedRAMP
    3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring

    Penalties

    PIPL
    Fines to 5% revenue, business suspension
    FedRAMP
    No fines, delisting from marketplace

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PIPL and FedRAMP

    PIPL FAQ

    FedRAMP FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages