PRINCE2
Project management methodology with 7 principles, practices, processes
Basel III
Global framework strengthening bank capital, leverage, liquidity.
Quick Verdict
PRINCE2 provides structured project governance for all organizations worldwide, while Basel III mandates capital and liquidity standards for banks. Companies adopt PRINCE2 for repeatable delivery control; banks implement Basel III for regulatory compliance and financial resilience.
PRINCE2
PRINCE2 (Projects IN Controlled Environments) 7th Edition
Key Features
- Manage by exception using tolerance thresholds
- Manage by stages with board decision gates
- Continued business justification throughout lifecycle
- Tailoring mandatory for project context adaptation
- Defined roles ensuring clear accountability structure
Basel III
Basel III Post-Crisis Reforms Framework
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital minimums and buffers
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Enhanced Pillar 3 disclosure templates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PRINCE2 Details
What It Is
PRINCE2 (Projects IN Controlled Environments) 7th Edition is a structured project management methodology and certification framework. It provides governance, control, and delivery mechanisms for projects of all scales, emphasizing principle-based, process-driven management with tailoring to context.
Key Components
- **Three pillars7 principles (guiding obligations), 7 practices (business case, organization, plans, quality, risk, issues, progress), 7 processes (starting up to closing).
- **Performance targetstime, cost, quality, scope, benefits, risk, sustainability.
- **CertificationFoundation (knowledge), Practitioner (application/tailoring).
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures controlled value delivery and auditability.
- Reduces risks via exception management and stage gates.
- Builds stakeholder trust through defined roles and business justification.
- Offers competitive edge in regulated sectors like public, IT, construction.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachreadiness assessment, tailoring blueprint, training, pilots, rollout.
- Scalable for any size/industry; focuses on governance model change.
- No mandatory audits, but certification pathways ensure competence. (178 words)
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2008 financial crisis. It establishes prudential standards for banks, focusing on enhancing capital quality and quantity, constraining leverage, and ensuring liquidity resilience. Its methodology integrates risk-weighted capital requirements with non-risk-based leverage and liquidity ratios for a multi-metric approach.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, liquidity minimums), Pillar 2 (supervisory review/ICAAP), Pillar 3 (disclosures for market discipline).
- Capital ratios: CET1 ≥4.5%, Tier 1 ≥6%, Total ≥8%, plus buffers (CCB 2.5%, CCyB up to 2.5%, G-SIB/D-SIB).
- Leverage ratio ≥3%; LCR and NSFR ≥100%.
- No fixed controls; relies on standardized/internal models with output floor.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks implement for mandatory jurisdictional compliance, reducing systemic risk and crisis vulnerabilities. Benefits include stronger resilience, optimized balance sheets, improved comparability, and investor confidence via disclosures. It drives strategic asset allocation and competitive positioning.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise program: governance setup, data/IT upgrades, model validation, stress testing. Targets internationally active banks globally; ongoing via supervisory oversight, Pillar 3 reporting, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PRINCE2 | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Project management governance and lifecycle | Bank capital, liquidity, leverage requirements |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, scalable by size | Banking sector, internationally active banks |
| Nature | Voluntary structured methodology, certification | Mandatory prudential regulation, supervisory enforcement |
| Testing | Stage boundaries, audits, Foundation/Practitioner exams | Stress tests, ICAAP, supervisory reviews, disclosures |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss | Fines, capital add-ons, business restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PRINCE2 and Basel III
PRINCE2 FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
J-SOX vs IATF 16949
Compare J-SOX vs IATF 16949: Japan's principles-based ICFR regime meets automotive QMS standards. Discover key differences, COSO alignment, and compliance strategies for listed firms.
GDPR vs ISO 50001
Compare GDPR vs ISO 50001: Privacy law meets energy mgmt standard. Master compliance, cut risks, optimize efficiency & sustainability. Discover key diffs now!
K-PIPA vs J-SOX
Compare K-PIPA vs J-SOX: Korea's consent-driven privacy law meets Japan's ICFR controls. Decode differences, risks, penalties & compliance strategies for APAC success. Dive in!