What is the primary objective of **PRINCE2**?

**The primary objective of PRINCE2 is to provide a structured project management method for controlled delivery of value through reliable governance, decision rights, and exception-based management.** PRINCE2 achieves this via its "methodology of 7s": **seven Principles** (e.g., continued business justification, manage by stages), **seven Practices** (Business Case, Organizing, Plans, Quality, Risk, Issues, Progress), and **seven Processes** (Starting Up a Project through Closing a Project). In the 7th Edition, it emphasizes tailoring, people, sustainability, and performance targets like time, cost, scope, quality, risk, benefits, and sustainability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PRINCE2**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with PRINCE2, as it is a voluntary project management standard, not a regulatory mandate.** Professionally, it is adopted by executives, project boards (Executive, Senior User, Senior Supplier), project managers, and teams in public-sector, regulated industries (e.g., healthcare, construction, IT), and enterprises needing auditable governance. Certification paths (Foundation → Practitioner) build competence for these roles.

Does **PRINCE2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PRINCE2 does not require external audits or third-party certification for projects or organizations.** Compliance is demonstrated internally through adherence to the **seven Principles** as "guiding obligations," evidenced by management products like PID, business cases, stage plans, risk/issue registers, and lessons logs. Optional individual certifications (Foundation, Practitioner) via PeopleCert validate knowledge; project assurance provides internal oversight.

How often should an assessment for **PRINCE2** be performed?

**PRINCE2 assessments occur at defined stage boundaries and through continuous Practices application.** Formal reviews happen during **Managing a Stage Boundary** processes, where the project board evaluates viability, updates the business case, and authorizes continuation. Ongoing monitoring via **Progress Practice** (highlight/exception reports) and tolerances ensures exception-based escalation; lessons are assessed from project start and at closure.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PRINCE2**?

**Non-compliance with PRINCE2 results in organizational risks like project failure, cost overruns, and weak governance, but no legal penalties since it is voluntary.** Internally, it leads to poor business justification, uncontrolled risks/issues, role ambiguity, and failed audits in regulated contexts. Tailored but principle-violating use (e.g., no stages or tolerances) reduces success rates, as dogmatic or superficial adoption underperforms disciplined application.

An **PRINCE2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, PRINCE2 can be mapped to other frameworks through its principle-based, scalable governance model.** Its 7 Principles, Practices, and Processes integrate with agile (via PRINCE2 Agile for hybrid delivery), providing compatibility for iterative methods while preserving controls like tolerances and stage gates. Tailoring supports alignment without altering core elements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **PRINCE2**?

**The first step to implement PRINCE2 is the "Starting Up a Project" (SU) process.** This involves creating a **project mandate**, appointing the Executive and Project Manager, assessing previous lessons, preparing an outline **business case**, assembling the **project brief**, and authorizing initiation. Tailoring decisions and role definitions follow to ensure principle adherence from inception.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective compliance management system (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a principles-based, scalable framework, it applies to all organization types and sizes, emphasizing proportionality to structure, nature, and complexity. The standard uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and high-level structure, focusing on translating **compliance obligations** (legal requirements, voluntary commitments) into processes, controls, and culture via leadership commitment, risk assessment, and continual improvement. Withdrawn in 2021 and replaced by ISO 37301, it remains a foundational governance tool.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it provides non-mandatory guidelines rather than certifiable requirements.** It targets any public, private, or non-profit entity seeking a structured CMS, scalable to size, structure, nature, and complexity. Professionals such as CCOs, governance officers, and risk managers use it for benchmarking, internal audits, and demonstrating good governance to regulators, courts, stakeholders, and partners, particularly in regulated sectors.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a guidance standard without specified requirements.** Organizations conduct internal **planned audits** (Clause 9.2) using systematic, independent processes per ISO 19011, alongside monitoring, management reviews, and self-assessments. **Direct access**, **independence**, and **adequate resources** for the compliance function enable internal evaluation, with external audits optional for assurance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 requires compliance risk assessments with reassessment upon changes or issues, alongside planned intervals for audits and management reviews.** **Compliance obligations** and risks (Clause 4.5-4.6) demand ongoing monitoring for updates, with **internal audits** (Clause 9.2) at planned intervals based on risk. **Management reviews** (Clause 9.3) occur periodically, considering performance data, nonconformities, and changes, ensuring dynamic CMS evaluation without fixed frequencies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**Non-alignment with ISO 19600 guidelines carries no direct penalties, as it specifies no mandatory requirements.** However, weak CMS exposes organizations to broader risks: regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, and judicial scrutiny where courts consider CMS evidence in penalty determinations. Effective implementation demonstrates governance, potentially mitigating enforcement outcomes.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600’s high-level structure and PDCA cycle enable mapping to other management system frameworks.** Its clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) align with identical architectures, supporting integration while preserving **compliance function independence**. This facilitates unified processes, reducing silos.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is determining the CMS scope and organizational context (Clauses 4.1-4.3), available as documented information.** Identify internal/external issues, **interested parties**, and boundaries, informing **compliance obligations** (Clause 4.5) and **governance principles** (Clause 4.4: direct access, independence, resources). Secure leadership commitment via a compliance policy (Clause 5.2).

PRINCE2 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

PRINCE2

Voluntary

2023

Project management methodology for governance and control

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

PRINCE2 provides structured project governance for controlled delivery across sectors, while ISO 19600 offers compliance management guidelines for risk-based obligation handling. Organizations adopt PRINCE2 for repeatable project success and ISO 19600 for systematic compliance culture and risk mitigation.

Project Management

PRINCE2

PRINCE2 7th Edition: Projects IN Controlled Environments

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Manage by exception using tolerances
Continued business justification throughout lifecycle
Tailoring mandatory for project context
Staged governance with board authorizations
Product focus with acceptance criteria

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems—Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Principles of good governance for CMS
Risk-based PDCA management system structure
Scalable to organization size and complexity
Broad compliance obligations identification
Core and soft performance measures

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

PRINCE2 Details

What It Is

PRINCE2 7th Edition, officially Projects IN Controlled Environments, is a structured project management methodology. It provides governance, control, and delivery frameworks for projects of any scale, emphasizing principle-based, tailored application across lifecycle stages.

Key Components

**Seven PrinciplesGuiding obligations like continued business justification, manage by exception, tailoring.
**Seven PracticesBusiness case, organizing, plans, quality, risk, issues, progress.
**Seven ProcessesStarting up, directing, initiating, controlling stage, managing delivery/boundaries, closing.
Certification via Foundation and Practitioner levels.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures audit-ready governance and exception-based executive oversight.
Drives value delivery with staged decisions and tolerances.
Meets regulatory needs in public sectors; boosts success via tailoring.
Builds stakeholder trust through clear roles and benefits focus.

Implementation Overview

Phased: readiness assessment, tailoring blueprint, training, pilots, rollout.
Scalable for all sizes/industries; focuses on PID, registers, reports.
No mandatory audits, but certification pathways enhance competence.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is an international guideline standard published by ISO. It provides scalable, principles-based guidance for organizations to establish, implement, evaluate, maintain, and improve a Compliance Management System (CMS). The primary purpose is to help manage compliance obligations (legal, regulatory, contractual, voluntary) through a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach, aligned with ISO's high-level structure.

Key Components

Core clauses cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Emphasizes **principles of good governancecompliance function independence, direct board access, adequate resources.
No fixed number of controls; focuses on proportionate processes, risk assessment, obligations identification, training, monitoring (core/soft measures), audits, and continual improvement.
Non-certifiable guidelines, benchmarked internally.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates compliance risks, reduces penalties, enhances culture.
Supports integration with other ISO systems (e.g., 9001, 14001).
Builds stakeholder trust, aids regulatory defense; strategic enabler for governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls rollout, monitoring.
Applicable to all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical for scalable adoption.
No formal certification; internal audits/management reviews suffice. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	PRINCE2	ISO 19600
Scope	Project management methodology and governance	Compliance management systems guidelines
Industry	All sectors, global, scalable to size	All organizations, global, risk-proportionate
Nature	Voluntary structured method, certification available	Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable (withdrawn)
Testing	Stage reviews, exception reports, audits	Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring
Penalties	No legal penalties, project failure risk	No legal penalties, compliance exposure risk

Scope

PRINCE2

Project management methodology and governance

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

Industry

PRINCE2

All sectors, global, scalable to size

ISO 19600

All organizations, global, risk-proportionate

Nature

PRINCE2

Voluntary structured method, certification available

ISO 19600

Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable (withdrawn)

Testing

PRINCE2

Stage reviews, exception reports, audits

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring

Penalties

PRINCE2

No legal penalties, project failure risk

ISO 19600

No legal penalties, compliance exposure risk

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about PRINCE2 and ISO 19600

PRINCE2 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs COBIT

Discover ISO 27001 vs COBIT: Compare ISMS certification for security vs IT governance framework. Optimize risk, compliance & resilience—pick the best fit now!

ISO 37001 vs ISO 19600

Compare ISO 37001 vs ISO 19600: Certifiable anti-bribery system vs compliance guidelines. Uncover key differences in scope, implementation & benefits to build resilient CMS. Choose wisely today!

K-PIPA vs SOC 2

Compare K-PIPA vs SOC 2: Korea's strict consent-centric law vs US flexible security audits. Master compliance gaps, CPO mandates & fines for global ops. Expert insights await.

PRINCE2

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

PRINCE2

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

PRINCE2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

PRINCE2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of PRINCE2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PRINCE2?

Does PRINCE2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PRINCE2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PRINCE2?

An PRINCE2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PRINCE2?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs COBIT

ISO 37001 vs ISO 19600

K-PIPA vs SOC 2