REACH
EU regulation for chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
CSA
Canadian consensus standards for occupational health and safety
Quick Verdict
REACH mandates chemical risk management across EU supply chains, requiring registration and restrictions for market access. CSA provides voluntary standards and certifications for safety and compliance. Companies adopt REACH for legal EU operations, CSA for product credibility and best practices.
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 on REACH
Key Features
- Shifts responsibility to industry for chemical risk management
- Requires registration of substances exceeding 1 tonne/year
- Authorisation regime for SVHCs drives substitution
- Annex XVII enforces EU-wide chemical restrictions
- Mandates supply-chain SDS communication and updates
CSA
CSA Z1000 Occupational Health and Safety Management
Key Features
- Consensus-based development with SCC oversight
- PDCA cycle for OHS management systems
- Hazard identification and risk assessment methods
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizing elimination
- Worker participation and continual improvement audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation establishing a comprehensive framework for managing chemical risks across their lifecycle. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and the environment through industry-generated data on hazards, exposures, and safe use, while promoting innovation and reducing animal testing. It employs a risk-based, industry-responsibility approach with tonnage-triggered obligations.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration (>1 tonne/year dossiers), Evaluation (dossier/substance checks), Authorisation (Annex XIV SVHC permissions), Restriction (Annex XVII bans/limits).
- 17 technical annexes detailing data requirements, SDS rules, and lists.
- Core principles: burden shift to industry, supply-chain communication, continuous updates.
- No certification; compliance enforced nationally with ECHA coordination.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for EU market access; avoids fines, seizures, market bans. Reduces risks via hazard knowledge, enables substitution, builds supply-chain trust. Enhances competitiveness through safer products and ESG alignment.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, substance inventory, dossiers/CSRs via IUCLID, SDS management, monitoring Annex/Candidate List updates. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users in chemicals/manufacturing; cross-industry, EU/EEA scope. Ongoing audits, no central certification.
CSA Details
What It Is
CSA standards, developed by CSA Group, are a family of Canadian consensus-based standards for occupational health and safety (OHS), exemplified by CSA Z1000 (OHSMS) and CSA Z1002 (hazard identification). They provide risk-based frameworks aligned with PDCA cycle and ISO 45001 for managing workplace safety systematically.
Key Components
- **PDCA structurePolicy/leadership, planning, implementation, checking, management review.
- Core elements: Hazard classification (biological, chemical, ergonomic, etc.), risk assessment, hierarchy of controls.
- Over 6 hazard categories; voluntary with certification via SCC-accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances due diligence, reduces liability when referenced in law (~65% in model codes). Builds compliance, risk management, worker trust; supports market access and continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
Phased: Gap analysis, policy development, training, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries in Canada/internationally; certification optional but audit-driven for assurance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | REACH | CSA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction lifecycle | Standards development, product certification, OHS management systems |
| Industry | Chemicals, manufacturing, import/export EU-wide | All sectors, Canada-focused, global certification recognition |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation directly applicable | Voluntary consensus standards, mandatory when referenced |
| Testing | Dossier submission, compliance checks, substance evaluation | Product testing, certification audits, management system reviews |
| Penalties | Fines, market bans, criminal sanctions by Member States | No direct penalties, loss of certification/market access |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about REACH and CSA
REACH FAQ
CSA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 22000 vs MAS TRM
Discover ISO 22000 vs MAS TRM: Compare food safety FSMS governance, hazard controls & PDCA with tech risk frameworks, resilience & cyber guidelines. Expert insights for compliance!
SOX vs CIS Controls
Discover SOX vs CIS Controls: SOX enforces financial accuracy & ICFR audits; CIS prioritizes cyber hygiene via 18 safeguards. Align compliance, cut risks—explore now!
IEC 62443 vs ISO 31000
Discover IEC 62443 vs ISO 31000: OT cybersecurity powerhouse (zones, SLs, ISASecure) vs broad risk guidelines. Secure IACS—compare now for resilience!