REACH
EU regulation for chemical registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
IATF 16949
Global standard for automotive quality management systems
Quick Verdict
REACH mandates chemical risk management across EU supply chains via registration and restrictions, ensuring safety. IATF 16949 certifies automotive quality via core tools and audits for defect prevention. Companies adopt REACH for legal compliance, IATF for OEM contracts.
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)
Key Features
- Mandates registration for substances over 1 tonne/year per entity
- Shifts burden of proof to industry for risk assessment
- Authorises SVHC uses via application before sunset dates
- Imposes EU-wide restrictions on unacceptable chemical risks
- Requires supply-chain SDS and SVHC communication duties
IATF 16949
IATF 16949:2016
Key Features
- Mandates automotive core tools (APQP, FMEA, PPAP, MSA, SPC)
- Non-delegable top management QMS responsibility
- Risk-based planning with contingency measures
- Robust supplier development and second-party audits
- Product safety processes and warranty management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation governing chemicals lifecycle. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and environment by requiring industry-generated data on hazards, exposures, and risks. Scope covers substances, mixtures, and articles; key approach shifts responsibility to manufacturers/importers for registration above 1 tonne/year.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, Restriction.
- 17 technical Annexes (e.g., XIV for SVHC authorisation, XVII for restrictions).
- Dossiers via IUCLID include CSRs for >10 tonnes/year.
- No certification; continuous compliance enforced nationally with ECHA coordination.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for EU market access; avoids fines, seizures, market bans. Reduces risks via substitution, enhances supply-chain transparency. Builds trust, supports ESG, drives innovation in safer chemistries.
Implementation Overview
Phased: inventory substances, gap analysis, dossier preparation, monitoring Annexes/Candidate List. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users in EU/EEA; complex for global firms. Requires cross-functional teams, IT tools; ongoing audits, no central certification.
IATF 16949 Details
What It Is
IATF 16949:2016 is the international quality management system standard for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations. It supplements ISO 9001:2015 with automotive-specific requirements focused on defect prevention, variation reduction, and waste elimination across the supply chain. It employs a risk-based thinking and process approach aligned with PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 mirroring ISO 9001, plus 16 automotive-focused areas.
- Mandatory **core toolsAPQP, FMEA, Control Plan, MSA, SPC, PPAP.
- Emphasizes product safety, supplier management, CSRs, and warranty systems.
- Third-party certification via IATF-recognized bodies with rules-based audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual prerequisite for OEM suppliers.
- Reduces COPQ, enhances reliability, ensures supply chain consistency.
- Builds stakeholder trust, mitigates recall risks, improves competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, core tool deployment, training, audits.
- Applies to automotive sites including remote support functions.
- Requires Stage 1/2 certification audits; 6–36 months typical timeline.
Key Differences
| Aspect | REACH | IATF 16949 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction | Automotive quality management, defect prevention, core tools |
| Industry | Chemicals, manufacturing, EU-wide all sectors | Automotive supply chain, production sites globally |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation, legally binding | Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Dossier submissions, substance evaluations by ECHA | Core tools (APQP, FMEA, PPAP), third-party audits |
| Penalties | National fines, market bans, effective/proportionate penalties | Certification loss, OEM contract exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about REACH and IATF 16949
REACH FAQ
IATF 16949 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs FSSC 22000
RoHS vs FSSC 22000: Compare EU electronics hazard restrictions with food safety certification. Unlock compliance strategies, exemptions & global market insights now!
SOC 2 vs Basel III
Explore SOC 2 vs Basel III: Tech compliance via Trust Services Criteria (security focus) vs banks' capital buffers, LCR/NSFR liquidity. Key diffs, impacts & strategies. Dive in!
BREEAM vs NERC CIP
Discover BREEAM vs NERC CIP: Compare building sustainability certification with grid cybersecurity standards. Boost compliance, resilience & performance. Choose wisely—read now!