What is the primary objective of **REACH**?

**The primary objective of REACH is to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment from chemical risks while enhancing EU chemicals industry innovation and competitiveness.** REACH (**Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006**) shifts responsibility to industry for generating and documenting substance hazard, exposure, and risk management data via registration dossiers submitted to **ECHA**. It promotes alternative non-animal testing methods and drives substitution of **SVHCs** through authorisation (**Annex XIV**) and restrictions (**Annex XVII**).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **REACH**?

**REACH legally requires manufacturers, importers, and downstream users placing substances, mixtures, or certain articles on the EU/EEA market to comply.** Registration applies to substances manufactured or imported >**1 tonne/year per legal entity**. **Importers** handle non-EU substances; **downstream users** must implement exposure scenarios and communicate via **SDS** (**Annex II**). Non-EU firms appoint an **Only Representative**. Article producers notify **ECHA** for **SVHCs** ≥**0.1% w/w** exceeding **1 tonne/year** (**Article 7(2)**).

Does **REACH** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, REACH does not require external audits or third-party certification.** It imposes ongoing obligations like dossier submission to **ECHA**, compliance checks via dossier evaluation (**Articles 40-42**), and substance evaluation (**Articles 44-48**) by Member States. Enforcement occurs through national inspections; no "REACH certificate" exists. Companies maintain **10-year records** for audit readiness.

How often should an assessment for **REACH** be performed?

**REACH assessments must be performed continuously as a living obligation, with updates triggered by events like tonnage changes or list amendments.** Dossiers require updates for new hazards or uses. Monitor **Candidate List** (biannual updates), **Annex XIV** (**LAD/Sunset Dates**), and **Annex XVII** amendments. Annual tonnage reviews and **CoRAP** checks ensure compliance; **SDS** updates occur "without delay" for new information.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **REACH**?

**Non-compliance with REACH results in national penalties that must be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive under **Article 126**.** These include fines, product seizures, market bans, and potential criminal sanctions varying by Member State. Examples: administrative fines or custodial sentences for severe violations. Additional risks: supply disruptions, **Article 33** claims (45-day SVHC responses), and ECHA follow-ups from evaluations.

An **REACH** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**REACH cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks as it is a standalone EU regulation.** Its technical annexes (**I-XVII**) define unique requirements like tonnage-based data (**Annexes VII-X**) and SVHC processes. While data may support global regimes, REACH obligations (e.g., **IUCLID** dossiers, **ECHA** submissions) remain distinct without formal equivalences or mutual recognition.

What is the first step to begin implementing **REACH**?

**The first step to implement REACH is to conduct a substance inventory identifying all substances manufactured or imported ≥1 tonne/year per legal entity.** Map tonnages, uses, **SVHC** presence (**Candidate List**), and roles (**manufacturer/importer/downstream user**). Prioritize by **Annexes XIV/XVII** and develop a gap analysis for registration dossiers (**Article 10**).

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it promotes a risk-based approach grounded in principles of **good governance**, **proportionality**, **transparency**, and **sustainability**. Applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, it follows a high-level structure with 10 clauses mirroring Annex SL (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement), enabling integration with existing processes via Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a voluntary Type B guidance standard without mandatory requirements.** It applies universally to all organization types, sizes, sectors, and geographies facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal obligations. Professionals such as Chief Compliance Officers, board risk committees, and governance officers in financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, SMEs, and startups use it to benchmark CMS against regulator expectations, demonstrating structured risk management.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it is non-certifiable guidance.** Organizations conduct internal audits per ISO 19011, self-assessments, and management reviews (Clause 9) to evaluate CMS effectiveness. Alignment is demonstrated via documented evidence like risk registers, policies, and KCIs to regulators, customers, or partners; it was withdrawn in 2021 and replaced by certifiable ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals, with continual reassessment triggered by changes in context, obligations, risks, or issues.** Clause 9 mandates monitoring, measurement, audits (Clause 9.2), and management reviews (Clause 9.3) on a scheduled basis—typically quarterly for reviews and annually for full audits—plus ad-hoc reviews for regulatory updates, incidents, or organizational changes like expansions or new processes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal obligations.** However, lacking a structured CMS increases exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, higher insurance costs, and governance failures from unaddressed compliance obligations and risks, as illustrated by cases like €12M fines for inadequate anti-bribery controls.

An **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks due to its Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA model.** Its 10 clauses align with management systems like quality and environmental standards, facilitating integration of compliance processes, risk registers, and documentation to avoid duplication while preserving independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing top-management endorsement via a board resolution and appointing a Compliance Steering Committee (Phase 0).** Define CMS scope considering organizational context (Clause 4), then proceed to gap analysis of legal obligations and risks (Clause 4.2–4.6) to establish leadership commitment (Clause 5).

REACH vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

REACH

Mandatory

2007

EU regulation for chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

REACH mandates chemical safety registration and restrictions for EU manufacturers/importers, ensuring market access. ISO 19600 provides voluntary CMS guidelines for all organizations to systematically manage compliance risks and build ethical cultures.

Chemical Safety

REACH

Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Shifts burden of proof to industry for risk management
Requires registration of substances exceeding 1 tonne/year
Authorisation regime for Substances of Very High Concern
EU-wide restrictions via Annex XVII for unacceptable risks
Mandatory supply-chain SDS and SVHC communication duties

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based guidelines for CMS establishment and improvement
Principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency
Annex SL structure integrates with other ISO standards
Scalable to all organization sizes and sectors
PDCA cycle supports continual improvement and benchmarking

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

REACH Details

What It Is

REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation governing chemicals lifecycle. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and environment by shifting responsibility to industry for identifying, registering, and managing chemical risks. Scope covers substances, mixtures, and articles; uses a risk-based approach with tonnage-triggered data requirements.

Key Components

Four pillars: Registration (>1 tonne/year dossiers), Evaluation (dossier/substance checks), Authorisation (SVHC permission via Annex XIV), Restriction (bans/limits via Annex XVII).
17 technical annexes define data needs, SDS rules, exemptions.
Core principles: industry burden, substitution promotion, supply-chain communication.
No certification; continuous compliance via ECHA databases.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal obligation for EU market access; avoids fines, seizures, market bans. Reduces risks via hazard data; drives innovation/substitution. Builds stakeholder trust, ESG alignment, supply-chain resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, substance inventory, dossiers/CSRs, SDS management, monitoring. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users EU-wide; cross-industry. Involves IT tools (IUCLID, REACH-IT); national enforcement audits.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). Using a risk-based approach, it follows the Annex SL structure with 10 clauses mirroring other ISO management systems.

Key Components

**Core principlesGood governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
**PillarsContext understanding, leadership commitment, planning (obligations, risks), support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Flexible; no mandatory controls or certification, but benchmarks CMS effectiveness.
Precursor to certifiable ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks; avoids fines and disruptions.
Drives efficiency via integration with ISO 9001/14001; 10-20% cost savings.
Enables market access, competitive edge in RFPs; builds trust and culture.

Implementation Overview

**Phased roadmapLeadership buy-in, gap analysis, design/documentation, rollout, continuous improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors/geographies.
No certification; uses internal audits, self-assessments per ISO 19011.

Key Differences

Aspect	REACH	ISO 19600
Scope	Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction	Compliance management systems guidelines
Industry	Chemicals, manufacturing, importers EU-wide	All organizations, all sectors globally
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation, legally binding	Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable
Testing	Dossier submissions, substance evaluations by ECHA	Internal audits, management reviews recommended
Penalties	Fines, market bans, national enforcement	No legal penalties, self-improvement focus

Scope

REACH

Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

Industry

REACH

Chemicals, manufacturing, importers EU-wide

ISO 19600

All organizations, all sectors globally

Nature

REACH

Mandatory EU regulation, legally binding

ISO 19600

Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable

Testing

REACH

Dossier submissions, substance evaluations by ECHA

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews recommended

Penalties

REACH

Fines, market bans, national enforcement

ISO 19600

No legal penalties, self-improvement focus

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about REACH and ISO 19600

REACH FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs MLPS 2.0: Master electronic records/signatures rules & China's cybersecurity graded protection. Key scopes, controls, gaps & strategies for global compliance. Achieve readiness now!

APPI vs TISAX

APPI vs TISAX: Japan's data privacy law meets automotive security standard. Compare compliance frameworks, risks, pitfalls & strategies for global ops. Master both now!

PCI DSS vs Australian Privacy Act

PCI DSS vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare payment security standards with privacy principles like APPs & NDB. Key differences, compliance tips for Aussie businesses. Protect data & avoid fines now!

REACH

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

REACH

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

REACH Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

REACH FAQ

What is the primary objective of REACH?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with REACH?

Does REACH require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for REACH be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with REACH?

An REACH be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing REACH?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

An ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

APPI vs TISAX

PCI DSS vs Australian Privacy Act