What is the primary objective of **RoHS**?

**The primary objective of **RoHS** is to restrict hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) to protect human health and the environment during waste management and recycling.** Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2), amended by (EU) 2015/863, limits ten substances—**lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP**—at maximum concentration values (**MCVs**) of **0.1% by weight (1000 ppm)** in homogeneous materials (except **0.01% (100 ppm)** for Cd), unless exempted. This supports WEEE recyclability by minimizing toxic burdens in end-of-life processing.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **RoHS**?

**Manufacturers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives placing EEE on the EU market must comply with **RoHS****. Scope covers "all EEE unless specifically excluded" per Article 2(4), including Annex I categories like household appliances, IT equipment, lighting, tools, medical devices, and monitoring instruments. Exclusions apply to large-scale fixed installations, military equipment, and space gear. Responsibilities include ensuring homogeneous materials meet MCVs, maintaining technical files, and issuing EU Declarations of Conformity (DoC).

Does **RoHS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, **RoHS** does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance relies on internal conformity assessment under the New Legislative Framework: manufacturers self-declare via DoC, supported by technical documentation per EN IEC 63000:2018 (e.g., BOMs, supplier declarations, risk assessments, IEC 62321 test reports). CE marking applies where relevant; market surveillance by Member States may request files retained for 10 years.

How often should an assessment for **RoHS** be performed?

**RoHS assessments must be performed upon product changes, supplier notifications, and exemption expiries, with periodic reviews at least annually for high-risk materials.** Dynamic elements like delegated acts amending Annexes III/IV require ongoing monitoring. Risk-based verification—XRF screening incoming lots, confirmatory testing (ICP-MS/GC-MS) every 1-2 years for critical homogeneous materials—ensures sustained compliance amid supply chain variations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **RoHS**?

**Non-compliance with **RoHS** triggers decentralized Member State enforcement, including product recalls, sales bans, and administrative fines varying by jurisdiction.** Risks include market withdrawal, customs seizures, and potential criminal liability for persistent violations. No unified EU penalties exist; consequences escalate with evidence gaps in technical files during surveillance.

Can **RoHS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, **RoHS** maps to frameworks like China RoHS 2, which aligns on core six substances but mandates labeling, E-PUP marking, and Hazardous Substance Tables without EU-style exemptions.** California SB50 covers select substances for covered devices. Mapping aids global strategies but requires jurisdiction-specific adaptations for scope, disclosure, and enforcement.

What is the first step to begin implementing **RoHS**?

**The first step to implement **RoHS** is scoping products against Annex I categories and exclusions to confirm applicability.** Develop a decision tree for EEE classification, disaggregate BOMs to homogeneous materials, and initiate supplier declarations per IEC 63000 for technical file assembly.

What is the primary objective of **BRC**?

**The primary objective of BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is to ensure the production of safe, legal, authentic, and quality-assured food products through a structured management system.** It combines **senior management commitment** with a **Codex HACCP-based food safety plan** and robust **prerequisite programs** (GMP/GHP) to control contamination, mislabelling, food fraud, and operational risks across manufacturing, processing, and packing.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **BRC**?

**BRC compliance is professionally required for food manufacturers, processors, and packers supplying major retailers and GFSI-recognized supply chains worldwide.** It targets sites producing processed foods, ingredients, primary products like fruit/vegetables, and domestic pet foods under direct management control; retailers mandate it for market access, with 22,000+ sites certified globally.

Does **BRC** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, BRC requires mandatory external audits by accredited certification bodies, resulting in third-party certification valid for one year.** Audits are site-specific (announced or unannounced), covering nine clauses with grading (AA/A/B/C/D); fundamental requirements must be met, or certification is denied/withdrawn.

How often should an assessment for **BRC** be performed?

**BRC requires annual external certification audits, supplemented by internal audits at least four times yearly across all clauses.** **Management reviews** occur annually, with **monthly food safety meetings** and **quarterly objective reporting**; unannounced audits enhance ongoing verification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **BRC**?

**Non-compliance with BRC results in audit grading downgrades, certification suspension/denial, or withdrawal, blocking retailer supply chains.** Critical/major non-conformities in fundamental clauses (e.g., HACCP, traceability) demand root cause analysis and CAPA closure within 28 days; repeated failures increase audit frequency and risk contract loss.

Can **BRC** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, BRC can be mapped to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks, providing a strong foundation for regulatory alignment like US FSMA Preventive Controls.** Its HACCP, PRPs, and governance exceed many requirements, though adaptations for terminology (e.g., PCQI designation) and validation cadences are needed for full interoperability.

What is the first step to begin implementing **BRC**?

**The first step to implement BRC is securing senior management commitment through a signed food safety policy and establishing a multidisciplinary implementation team.** Conduct a gap analysis using BRC's Get Started Assessment Tool against the nine clauses, prioritizing fundamental requirements and site standards.

RoHS vs BRC | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

RoHS

Mandatory

2011

EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in EEE

BRC

Voluntary

2022

Global standard for food safety certification

Quick Verdict

RoHS restricts hazardous substances in electronics for EU market access, while BRC certifies food safety management. Companies adopt RoHS for legal compliance and recyclability; BRC for retailer approval and supply chain trust.

Hazardous Substances

RoHS

Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Restricts 10 substances at 0.1% in homogeneous materials
Open scope covers all EEE unless explicitly excluded
Time-limited exemptions renewed via delegated directives
Requires technical file and EU Declaration of Conformity
Tiered verification using IEC 62321 testing methods

Food Safety

BRC

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Senior management commitment and culture plan
Codex HACCP-based food safety plan
Fundamental requirements for non-conformities
Site standards and risk zoning controls
Environmental monitoring and food defence

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

RoHS Details

What It Is

RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, recast as RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). Its primary purpose is protecting health and environment by limiting risks in EEE waste management, improving recyclability alongside WEEE Directive. Scope is open: all EEE unless excluded. Key approach: homogeneous material thresholds (0.1% w/w most substances, 0.01% cadmium).

Key Components

**10 restricted substancesPb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP.
**AnnexesII (substances), III/IV (time-limited exemptions).
**Compliance modelTechnical documentation per EN IEC 63000, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), CE marking where applicable; no central certification.
Built on risk-based evidence: supplier declarations, targeted testing (IEC 62321).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for EU market access; prevents fines, recalls, bans. Drives supply chain governance, substitution innovation, ESG alignment. Enhances recyclability, stakeholder trust, global competitiveness (e.g., vs China RoHS 2).

Implementation Overview

Phased: scope analysis, BoM review, supplier qualification, testing (XRF/ICP-MS), technical files. Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE; scales by portfolio complexity. Retain docs 10 years for surveillance; ongoing exemption tracking essential. (178 words)

BRC Details

What It Is

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and prerequisite programs like GMP/GHP.

Key Components

Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergens, CAPA) critical for certification.
Built on risk assessments, internal audits, and root cause analysis.
Annual audits with grading (AA/A/B/C/D).

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
Reduces recalls via robust controls on allergens, pathogens, labelling.
Builds trust, evidences due diligence, supports FSMA compliance.
Drives continuous improvement and operational resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, HACCP development, training, mock audits. Applies to manufacturers globally; requires CAPEX for site upgrades, digital tools. Certification via accredited bodies with announced/unannounced options. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	RoHS	BRC
Scope	Hazardous substances in EEE materials	Food safety management systems
Industry	Electronics manufacturing, global	Food manufacturing and packaging
Nature	Mandatory EU directive for market access	Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification
Testing	XRF screening, IEC 62321 lab analysis	Annual site audits, internal verification
Penalties	Decentralized fines, product withdrawal	Certification loss, no legal penalties

Scope

RoHS

Hazardous substances in EEE materials

BRC

Food safety management systems

Industry

RoHS

Electronics manufacturing, global

BRC

Food manufacturing and packaging

Nature

RoHS

Mandatory EU directive for market access

BRC

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification

Testing

RoHS

XRF screening, IEC 62321 lab analysis

BRC

Annual site audits, internal verification

Penalties

RoHS

Decentralized fines, product withdrawal

BRC

Certification loss, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about RoHS and BRC

RoHS FAQ

BRC FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IFS Food vs ISO 22301

Discover IFS Food vs ISO 22301: Compare GFSI food safety audits with BCM resilience. Boost compliance, cut risks for manufacturers. Read insights now!

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs C-TPAT

Discover CSL vs C-TPAT: China's Cybersecurity Law meets US supply chain security. Expert comparison, compliance strategies & implementation roadmap. Secure global trade now!

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF: Compare OH&S safety standard with enterprise architecture framework. Uncover PDCA/ADM cycles, leadership, risk mgmt & IMS integration benefits!

RoHS

BRC

Quick Verdict

RoHS

Key Features

BRC

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

RoHS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

BRC Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

RoHS FAQ

What is the primary objective of RoHS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with RoHS?

Does RoHS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for RoHS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with RoHS?

Can RoHS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing RoHS?

BRC FAQ

What is the primary objective of BRC?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BRC?

Does BRC require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for BRC be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BRC?

Can BRC be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing BRC?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IFS Food vs ISO 22301

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs C-TPAT

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF