What is the primary objective of **RoHS**?

**The primary objective of **RoHS** is to restrict hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) to protect human health and the environment during waste management and recycling.** Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2), as amended by Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/863, limits ten substances—lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP—at maximum concentration values (MCVs) of **0.1%** by weight (1000 ppm) in homogeneous materials (except **0.01%** or 100 ppm for Cd), enhancing recyclability alongside the WEEE Directive.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **RoHS**?

**Manufacturers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives placing EEE on the EU market must comply with **RoHS**, unless explicitly excluded.** Scope covers all EEE categories in Annex I (e.g., household appliances, IT equipment, lighting, medical devices) unless exclusions apply per Article 2(4), such as large-scale fixed installations, military equipment, or space systems. Compliance requires ensuring every homogeneous material meets MCVs or qualifies under time-limited Annex III/IV exemptions.

Does **RoHS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, **RoHS** does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance relies on internal conformity assessment per the New Legislative Framework: manufacturers issue an **EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC)** backed by technical documentation (per EN IEC 63000:2018) retained for 10 years, including BoMs, supplier declarations, risk assessments, and targeted testing. CE marking applies where relevant; market surveillance by Member States verifies evidence.

How often should an assessment for **RoHS** be performed?

**RoHS assessments must be performed continuously as a dynamic process, with periodic reviews tied to changes and risks.** Initial assessment occurs before market placement; ongoing verification includes supplier change notifications, annual high-risk material screening (e.g., XRF per IEC 62321), exemption expiry tracking (many sunset after 5-7 years), and confirmatory testing (ICP-MS/GC-MS) for suspect homogeneous materials. Reassess fully upon delegated directive updates or product changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **RoHS**?

**Non-compliance with **RoHS** results in decentralized enforcement by Member State authorities, including product withdrawal, recalls, sales bans, and administrative fines.** Penalties vary by jurisdiction (e.g., up to €10 million or 10% turnover in some cases); importers/distributors share liability for due diligence failures. Risks include customs seizures, reputational damage, and remediation costs from substance exceedances in homogeneous materials.

An **RoHS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, **RoHS** can be mapped to frameworks like China RoHS 2, which aligns on core substances but mandates labeling, E-PUP marking, and Hazardous Substance Tables without EU-style exemptions.** California's SB50 mirrors subsets (e.g., heavy metals) for covered devices. Mapping involves aligning substance lists/MCVs while addressing divergences in scope, documentation, and marking for multi-jurisdictional compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **RoHS**?

**The first step to implement **RoHS** is to conduct product scoping against Annex I categories and Article 2(4) exclusions.** Classify EEE (e.g., via decision trees for borderline cases like large-scale fixed installations), map BoMs to homogeneous materials, and perform a risk-based gap analysis identifying potential restricted substance hotspots (e.g., solders, plastics). This informs technical file assembly per EN IEC 63000.

What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system.** COBIT 2019, maintained by ISACA, structures enterprise governance of information and technology (EGIT) via 40 objectives across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by six governance system principles and seven components (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework owned by ISACA.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises needing structured EGIT, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities, to align I&T with business goals, demonstrate assurance via **MEA** objectives, and support capability assessments at levels 0-5 using the CMMI-based performance model.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Assessments use the COBIT Performance Management system (capability levels 0-5), enabling internal evaluations or optional ISACA-aligned reviews; **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supports self-managed assurance activities without formal certification mandates.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically as part of ongoing performance management, typically annually or tied to business changes.** The CMMI-based model (levels 0-5) in COBIT 2019 recommends regular capability reviews via **MEA** practices, with gap analyses in objectives like **APO02 Managed Strategy** to adapt to design factors such as risk profile or threat landscape.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a non-regulatory framework.** Indirect risks include weakened EGIT, unaddressed I&T risks, audit deficiencies, and failure to meet stakeholder needs, potentially amplifying regulatory exposures in aligned areas like financial reporting or data management through unoptimized **40 core objectives**.

An **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other frameworks via its governance framework principles.** Its openness principle enables alignment of **40 objectives** and components to standards through design factors and toolkits, facilitating integration without replacing operational models.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using design factors and the goals cascade.** COBIT 2019's design workflow begins with assessing **11 design factors** (e.g., strategy, risk profile, compliance requirements) to scope the governance system, baseline capabilities (levels 0-5), and prioritize objectives from the core model.

RoHS vs COBIT | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

RoHS

Mandatory

2011

EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in EEE

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

Quick Verdict

RoHS mandates hazardous substance limits in EEE for EU market access, while COBIT is a voluntary framework for IT governance aligning strategy with operations. Manufacturers adopt RoHS for compliance; enterprises use COBIT for risk management and value creation.

Hazardous Substances

RoHS

Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2 recast)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Restricts 10 hazardous substances in EEE homogeneous materials
Open-scope applies to all EEE unless excluded
0.1% max concentration thresholds per homogeneous material
Requires technical files and EU Declaration of Conformity
Time-limited exemptions managed via delegated directives

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
11 design factors for tailored governance systems
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
Goals cascade aligns stakeholder needs to metrics
Separation of governance from management roles

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

RoHS Details

What It Is

Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). It protects human health and the environment by limiting risks in EEE waste management, complementing WEEE Directive. Features open-scope applicability to all EEE unless excluded, with restrictions at homogeneous material level using maximum concentration values (MCVs).

Key Components

**10 restricted substancesPb, Cd, Hg, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP.
Thresholds: 0.1% (1000 ppm) for most, 0.01% (100 ppm) for Cd in homogeneous materials.
**Annex III/IV exemptionstime-limited, application-specific, renewed via delegated acts.
Compliance model: technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), CE marking, risk-based verification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU/EEA market access; non-compliance risks fines, recalls, bans.
Enhances recyclability, supply chain integrity, ESG reporting.
Drives substitution innovation, level playing field, stakeholder trust.
Mitigates enforcement by decentralized Member State authorities.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based: product scoping, BoM analysis, supplier declarations, tiered testing (IEC 62321), exemption tracking. Targets EEE manufacturers/importers/distributors. Involves EN IEC 63000 for documentation. No central certification; 10-year retention for market surveillance. Scales with portfolio complexity (3-18 months typical).

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology, is a comprehensive IT governance and management framework from ISACA. It enables organizations to create value from IT, manage risks, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into tailored governance systems via a design workflow and goals cascade.

Key Components

**5 domainsEDM (governance), APO (align/plan), BAI (build/implement), DSS (deliver/support), MEA (monitor/assess)
40 objectives in the core model
6 governance principles and 7 components (e.g., processes, structures, culture)
CMMI-based performance management (levels 0-5); maturity assessments, no formal certification

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT with business strategy for value delivery
Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR mappings) and risk optimization
Enhances audit readiness via MEA assurance
Builds board-level trust through measurable outcomes and ROI

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess gaps, design via 11 factors, pilot objectives, build capabilities
Suits all sizes/industries; requires ISACA training (Foundation, Design & Implementation)
Focuses on internal audits and continuous improvement (approx. 178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	RoHS	COBIT
Scope	Hazardous substances in EEE materials	Enterprise IT governance and management
Industry	EEE manufacturers worldwide	All industries with IT reliance
Nature	Mandatory EU product regulation	Voluntary governance framework
Testing	Material substance analysis (XRF, lab)	Capability maturity assessments
Penalties	Fines, recalls by Member States	No formal penalties

Scope

RoHS

Hazardous substances in EEE materials

COBIT

Enterprise IT governance and management

Industry

RoHS

EEE manufacturers worldwide

COBIT

All industries with IT reliance

Nature

RoHS

Mandatory EU product regulation

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework

Testing

RoHS

Material substance analysis (XRF, lab)

COBIT

Capability maturity assessments

Penalties

RoHS

Fines, recalls by Member States

COBIT

No formal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about RoHS and COBIT

RoHS FAQ

COBIT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CCPA vs PMBOK

Compare CCPA vs PMBOK: Navigate privacy compliance with project mastery. Discover frameworks, risks, pitfalls, and strategies for resilient implementation now!

FERPA vs ISO 27017

Compare FERPA vs ISO 27017: U.S. student privacy law meets cloud security standard. Discover differences, overlaps, and strategies for edtech compliance and data protection.

COPPA vs TOGAF

COPPA vs TOGAF: Compare child privacy law (verifiable consent, $170M fines) with EA framework (ADM phases, governance). Master compliance, risks & strategies for secure digital ops.

RoHS

COBIT

Quick Verdict

RoHS

Key Features

COBIT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

RoHS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

RoHS FAQ

What is the primary objective of RoHS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with RoHS?

Does RoHS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for RoHS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with RoHS?

An RoHS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing RoHS?

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

An COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CCPA vs PMBOK

FERPA vs ISO 27017

COPPA vs TOGAF