RoHS vs GLBA
RoHS
EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical equipment
GLBA
U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards
Quick Verdict
RoHS restricts hazardous substances in electronics for EU market access, while GLBA mandates privacy notices and security programs for US financial data handlers. Companies adopt RoHS for compliance and sales, GLBA to avoid FTC penalties and build trust.
RoHS
Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) restricting hazardous substances
Key Features
- Homogeneous materials limited to 0.1% (Cd 0.01%) thresholds
- Restricts ten specific hazardous substances in EEE
- Open scope covers all EEE unless explicitly excluded
- Time-limited exemptions requiring active lifecycle tracking
- Mandates technical file and EU Declaration of Conformity
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
- Written information security program with safeguards
- Qualified Individual designation and board reporting
- Breach notification to FTC within 30 days
- Broad scope covering non-bank financial institutions
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
RoHS Details
What It Is
RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, recast as RoHS 2, amended by 2015/863) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) to protect health and environment during waste management. It uses an open-scope approach (all EEE unless excluded) with homogeneous material concentration limits.
Key Components
- Ten restricted substances (Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, four phthalates) at 0.1% (Cd 0.01%) in homogeneous materials.
- Annex III/IV exemptions, time-limited and application-specific.
- Conformity assessment via technical documentation and EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC).
- Aligned with IEC 63000 for documentation and IEC 62321 for testing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal market access requirement for EU/EEA.
- Reduces supply chain risks, enables recyclability, supports circular economy.
- Builds stakeholder trust, avoids fines/recalls, provides competitive ESG edge.
Implementation Overview
- **Risk-basedgap analysis, supplier declarations, tiered testing (XRF screening, ICP-MS/GC-MS confirmation).
- Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE globally targeting EU; 10-year documentation retention.
- Phased: scoping, BoM review, exemptions tracking, audits (3-18 months typical).
GLBA Details
What It Is
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). GLBA uses a risk-based approach focusing on transparency in data sharing and robust safeguards against threats.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Requires initial/annual notices and opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing.
- **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Mandates a written information security program with administrative, technical, and physical controls; includes ~9 core elements like risk assessment and testing.
- **Pretexting ProvisionsProhibits obtaining NPI under false pretenses. Compliance is enforced by FTC for non-banks, with no formal certification but ongoing audits.
Why Organizations Use It
GLBA ensures legal compliance, mitigates breach risks, and builds customer trust. It drives governance maturity, vendor oversight, and resilience, offering competitive edges in trust-sensitive sectors.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls, testing. Applies to broad financial entities (banks, fintechs, tax firms); suits all sizes, U.S.-focused, with board reporting and audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | RoHS | GLBA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Hazardous substances in EEE materials | Consumer financial data privacy/security |
| Industry | Electronics manufacturers, global | Financial institutions, primarily US |
| Nature | Mandatory EU product restriction directive | Mandatory US privacy/security regulation |
| Testing | XRF screening, IEC 62321 lab analysis | Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Decentralized MS fines, product recalls | FTC fines up to $100k/violation, criminal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about RoHS and GLBA
RoHS FAQ
GLBA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

Why Default Microsoft 365 Settings Fail Cyber Essentials: A 2026 Audit-Ready Configuration Guide for UK SMEs
Uncover why out-of-the-box Microsoft 365 fails Cyber Essentials v3.3 assessments in 2026. Step-by-step hardening for Entra ID, Intune, MFA and 14-day patching t

The 2026 Cyber Essentials Hybrid Audit Checklist: Gathering Unassailable Proof Across M365, AWS, and Azure
Build an evidence vault that passes Cyber Essentials Plus audits in 2026. Practical guidance on firewalls, secure configuration, and malware protection across M
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how RoHS and GLBA compare against other standards