What is the primary objective of **RoHS**?

**The primary objective of **RoHS** is to restrict hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) to protect human health and the environment during waste management and recycling.** Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2), amended by (EU) 2015/863, limits ten substances—lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP—at 0.1% (1000 ppm) by weight in homogeneous materials (0.01% or 100 ppm for Cd), unless exempted. This enhances recyclability under the open-scope model for all EEE unless excluded.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **RoHS**?

**Manufacturers, importers, and distributors placing EEE on the EU market are legally required to comply with **RoHS**.** Responsibilities include ensuring products meet substance limits in homogeneous materials, preparing technical documentation per EN IEC 63000:2018, issuing EU Declarations of Conformity (DoC), and affixing CE marking where applicable. Scope covers 11 EEE categories (Annex I) unless excluded (e.g., large-scale fixed installations, military equipment).

Does **RoHS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, **RoHS** does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is self-assessed via internal technical documentation, supplier declarations, and risk-based testing (e.g., IEC 62321 series). Authorities verify via market surveillance; retain files for 10 years to demonstrate conformity upon request.

How often should an assessment for **RoHS** be performed?

**RoHS assessments should be performed continuously as part of a dynamic compliance management system, with periodic reviews tied to changes and risks.** Conduct initial scoping and verification before market placement; re-assess on supplier changes, exemption expiries (typically 5-7 years), or delegated directive updates. Annual audits and risk-based testing (e.g., XRF screening) ensure ongoing conformity.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **RoHS**?

**Non-compliance with **RoHS** results in decentralized Member State enforcement, including product withdrawal, recalls, sales bans, and administrative fines.** Penalties vary by jurisdiction (no unified EU schedule); risks include market exclusion, customs seizures, and liability for importers/distributors failing due diligence on technical files or DoC.

Can **RoHS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, **RoHS** can be mapped to frameworks like China RoHS 2, which aligns on core substances but mandates labeling, E-PUP marking, and disclosure without EU-style exemptions.** Similarities enable baseline alignment, but differences (e.g., broader China scope, no phthalates in core list) require tailored processes for multi-jurisdictional compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **RoHS**?

**The first step to implement **RoHS** is to conduct product scoping to determine applicability under Annex I categories and exclusions (Article 2(4)).** Map SKUs to EEE scope, identify homogeneous materials, and perform gap analysis of BoMs against the ten restricted substances and exemptions (Annexes III/IV).

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to promote sound practices for technology risk governance and cyber resilience in financial institutions.** The Monetary Authority of Singapore's Technology Risk Management Guidelines (revised January 2021) establish robust oversight by boards and senior management, alongside defence-in-depth controls to preserve confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data across governance, SDLC, operations, resilience, access, cryptography, cyber operations, and assessments (Preface §1.4; §2.1).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech sandbox participants.** Implementation must be proportionate to risk profile, service complexity, and technology use; boards and senior management bear ultimate accountability for establishing frameworks, approving risk appetite, and ensuring independent oversight and audit (§2.2; §3.1).

Does **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM mandates an independent internal audit function to assess TRM control effectiveness, governance, and risk management, but does not require external audits or certifications.** FIs must ensure audit independence (§3.1.7; §15); external penetration testing or assurance may be used for assessments like annual internet-facing system PT (§13.2.4), with remediation tracked by severity (§13.6).

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**Vulnerability assessments must be regular and commensurate with system criticality, while penetration testing is expected at least annually for internet-facing systems or after major changes.** DR plans require annual review; cyber exercises and red teaming occur based on risk; risk frameworks, policies, and asset inventories need periodic updates (§13.1.1; §13.2.4; §8.2.2; §4.1.5).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM can result in supervisory actions including fines, license conditions, revocations, and executive prohibitions.** Enforcement examples include S$27.45 million in AML/CFT fines across nine FIs and CMS license revocation due to governance failures; MAS evaluates TRM observance in supervision (§2.2).

Can **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**MAS TRM is designed for standalone implementation and does not explicitly reference mappings to other frameworks.** Its risk lifecycle (identify-assess-treat-monitor) and controls align conceptually with broader practices, but FIs must demonstrate proportionate adherence to TRM's spirit independently (§2.3).

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is board approval of a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establishment of an independent TRM function.** Senior management must then build asset inventories, classify by criticality, and define risk owners to enable proportionate controls (§3.1.7; §3.3; §4.1.3).

RoHS vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

RoHS

Mandatory

2011

EU directive restricting hazardous substances in EEE

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance

Quick Verdict

RoHS restricts hazardous substances in global EEE for environmental safety, while MAS TRM governs cyber/technology risks in Singapore finance for resilience. Manufacturers adopt RoHS for EU market access; FIs use TRM to meet supervisory expectations and avoid enforcement.

Hazardous Substances

RoHS

Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2 recast)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Homogeneous material concentration limits of 0.1% default
Open scope covers all EEE unless excluded
Ten restricted hazardous substances including phthalates
Time-limited exemptions via delegated directives
Requires technical documentation and EU DoC

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

Technology Risk Management Guidelines (January 2021)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board and senior management accountability for TRM
Proportionality based on risk and complexity
Comprehensive third-party risk management requirements
Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
Defence-in-depth cyber resilience framework

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

RoHS Details

What It Is

Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). It aims to protect health and environment by limiting risks in waste management, using maximum concentration values in homogeneous materials.

Key Components

Restricts 10 substances (Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP) at 0.1% (Cd 0.01%).
Annexes III/IV for time-limited exemptions.
Open scope for EEE categories unless excluded.
Compliance via technical documentation, EU DoC, and CE marking.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU market access.
Reduces enforcement risks (fines, recalls).
Improves recyclability with WEEE.
Enhances supply chain governance and ESG reputation.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based: gap analysis, supplier declarations, tiered testing (IEC 62321), exemption tracking. Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE globally selling to EU. Retain files 10 years for surveillance.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide a risk-based framework for managing technology and cyber risks across governance, operations, and resilience, emphasizing proportionality to FI size and complexity.

Key Components

15 sections covering governance, asset management, SDLC, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, testing, and audit.
Core principles: board accountability, defence-in-depth, security-by-design, continuous monitoring.
No fixed controls; compliance via supervisory review, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory observance for Singapore-regulated FIs to avoid fines, sanctions.
Enhances operational resilience, reduces cyber threats, builds customer trust.
Integrates with ERM, supports digital transformation securely.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance setup, asset inventory, control deployment, testing, monitoring.
Targets banks, insurers, fintechs in Singapore; scalable by risk profile.
Requires board-approved strategy, independent assurance; no certification but audit evidence essential. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	RoHS	MAS TRM
Scope	Hazardous substances in EEE materials	Technology/cyber risks in financial IT
Industry	EEE manufacturers globally	Singapore financial institutions
Nature	EU product restriction directive	Supervisory technology risk guidelines
Testing	IEC 62321 material analysis/XRF	Penetration testing, vulnerability scans
Penalties	Decentralized MS fines/recalls	Supervisory fines/license actions

Scope

RoHS

Hazardous substances in EEE materials

MAS TRM

Technology/cyber risks in financial IT

Industry

RoHS

EEE manufacturers globally

MAS TRM

Singapore financial institutions

Nature

RoHS

EU product restriction directive

MAS TRM

Supervisory technology risk guidelines

Testing

RoHS

IEC 62321 material analysis/XRF

MAS TRM

Penetration testing, vulnerability scans

Penalties

RoHS

Decentralized MS fines/recalls

MAS TRM

Supervisory fines/license actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about RoHS and MAS TRM

RoHS FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

LGPD vs FERPA

LGPD vs FERPA: Brazil's GDPR-like data law vs US student privacy act. Compare scopes, 2% revenue fines, rights transfer at 18 & enforcement. Master global compliance now!

PMBOK vs ISO 28000

Discover PMBOK vs ISO 28000: Compare project governance standards with supply chain security systems. Unlock tailoring, risk controls & compliance benefits for resilient delivery. Choose now!

FERPA vs NERC CIP

Discover FERPA vs NERC CIP: Compare education privacy rules with grid cybersecurity standards. Unlock key differences, compliance tips, and strategies for both sectors now!

RoHS

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

RoHS

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

RoHS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

RoHS FAQ

What is the primary objective of RoHS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with RoHS?

Does RoHS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for RoHS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with RoHS?

Can RoHS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing RoHS?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Does MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

Can MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

LGPD vs FERPA

PMBOK vs ISO 28000

FERPA vs NERC CIP