RoHS
EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in EEE
SAMA CSF
Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
RoHS restricts hazardous substances in EEE for EU market access, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms. Manufacturers adopt RoHS for compliance and recyclability; banks use SAMA CSF for regulatory resilience and threat defense.
RoHS
Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2)
Key Features
- Homogeneous material thresholds at 0.1% for most substances
- Open-scope applies to all EEE unless excluded
- Restricts ten specific hazardous substances in EEE
- Time-limited exemptions via delegated directives
- Requires technical documentation and EU Declaration of Conformity
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 baseline
- Four domains including third-party cybersecurity
- Principle-based controls with maturity progression
- Board oversight and independent CISO requirements
- Self-assessment and regulatory audit mechanisms
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
RoHS Details
What It Is
RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, recast as RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). Its primary purpose is protecting health and environment by limiting risks in EEE waste management, improving recyclability alongside WEEE Directive. Scope covers all EEE unless excluded, using homogeneous material approach with max concentrations (0.1% w/w most substances, 0.01% cadmium).
Key Components
- Ten restricted substances: Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP.
- Annexes III/IV for time-limited exemptions.
- Compliance via technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), CE marking.
- Risk-based evidentiary model per EN IEC 63000; testing via IEC 62321.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces enforcement risks (fines, recalls). Drives supply chain governance, substitution innovation, ESG credibility, recyclability. Ensures level playing field, prevents e-waste hazards.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope analysis, BoM review, supplier declarations, tiered testing (XRF/ICP-MS), technical files. Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE globally targeting EU. No central certification; Member State surveillance requires 10-year documentation retention. (178 words)
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF, Version 1.0, May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented blueprint to govern cybersecurity, focusing on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from cyber threats across information assets.
Key Components
- Four principal domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
- Six-level maturity model (Level 3 baseline: structured/formalized).
- Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; enforced via self-assessments and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance for banks, insurers, etc., avoiding penalties and scrutiny.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, improves efficiency.
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design, deployment, operations, audits.
- Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
- Requires self-assessments, evidence portfolios, continuous improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | RoHS | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Hazardous substances in EEE materials | Cybersecurity controls across financial operations |
| Industry | Electrical/electronic equipment manufacturers globally | Saudi financial institutions (banks, insurance) |
| Nature | EU product restriction directive, mandatory market access | Saudi regulatory framework, mandatory maturity levels |
| Testing | XRF screening, IEC 62321 lab analysis of materials | Self-assessments, audits, penetration testing |
| Penalties | Decentralized fines, recalls by Member States | Supervisory actions, fines by SAMA authorities |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about RoHS and SAMA CSF
RoHS FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APPI vs WEEE
Discover APPI vs WEEE: Japan's privacy law vs EU e-waste directive. Key compliance diffs, risks, strategies for global firms. Boost your ops—read now!
GMP vs NIST 800-53
Explore GMP vs NIST 800-53: Compare pharma quality standards with federal security controls. Uncover baselines, tailoring, risk mgmt diffs for optimal compliance. Dive in now!
EMAS vs Australian Privacy Act
EMAS vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare EU eco-management standards with Aussie privacy laws. Unlock key differences, compliance tips & strategies for success. Dive in!