What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations.** SAFe, originating from Dean Leffingwell's 2007 book and released in 2011 with SAFe 6.0 in 2023, integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles—like taking an economic view and organizing around value—with seven core competencies such as Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture. This enables coordination of **Agile Release Trains (ARTs)** (50-125 people) through **Program Increments (PIs)** of 8-12 weeks, driving faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement in software and IT operations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility rather than a regulatory standard.** Professionally, it is adopted by large enterprises scaling beyond single-team Agile, with over 20,000 organizations and 1 million certified practitioners using configurations from Essential SAFe (single ARTs) to Full SAFe (portfolio-level). It suits IT and software firms facing coordination challenges across hundreds of teams, particularly in regulated sectors embedding compliance via ART roles.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification, relying instead on internal assessments and Scaled Agile, Inc. training certifications.** Implementation uses self-assessments like maturity models and Inspect & Adapt workshops at PI ends, with optional certifications (e.g., SAFe Agilist, RTE) from the SAFe Academy to build competencies. Over 1 million professionals hold these, supporting phased rollouts without mandatory external validation.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed at the end of each Program Increment (PI), typically every 8-12 weeks, via Inspect & Adapt workshops.** These events include quantitative metrics reviews (e.g., flow, velocity) and qualitative problem-solving, fostering continuous improvement. Additional baseline assessments occur pre-implementation during value stream mapping, with ongoing maturity checks tied to the seven core competencies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**There are no legal consequences for non-compliance with SAFe, as it imposes no regulatory penalties; internal risks include failed agility transformations and suboptimal delivery.** Poor implementation leads to pitfalls like 'SAFe washing,' dependency chaos, and 30-70% failure rates, resulting in delayed time-to-market, siloed teams, and lost productivity gains (e.g., 30-75% improvements foregone). Success depends on roadmap adherence to mitigate these operational impacts.

Can **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other international frameworks through its flexible principles, roles, and configurations.** Its 10 Lean-Agile principles and core competencies align with methodologies like Scrum (team-level), Kanban (flow), DevOps (pipelines), and LeSS, while embedding compliance for standards such as GDPR and SOC 2 via 'trust but verify' practices and tools like Vanta. Configurations enable tailoring without direct mappings specified in SAFe documentation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to train executives in Lean-Agile Leadership via Leading SAFe certification and conduct a value stream assessment.** Per the SAFe Implementation Roadmap, this identifies value streams and ART boundaries, followed by phased rollout starting with Essential SAFe. Engage SAFe Program Consultants (SPCs) for guidance, ensuring leadership buy-in before ART launches.

What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through a comprehensive governance and management framework.** COBIT 2019 defines 40 governance and management objectives across five domains—**EDM** (Evaluate, Direct, Monitor), **APO** (Align, Plan, Organize), **BAI** (Build, Acquire, Implement), **DSS** (Deliver, Service, Support), and **MEA** (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess)—translating stakeholder needs via the goals cascade into actionable practices, supported by seven components and CMMI-based performance management (levels 0-5).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework owned by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises needing structured EGIT, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities, where boards and executives use its 40 objectives and design factors to demonstrate governance over I&T for audit, risk management, and value delivery.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a non-certifiable framework.** Organizations may conduct internal capability assessments using COBIT Performance Management (CPM, levels 0-5) or engage ISACA-accredited assessors for MEA04 (Managed Assurance), but assurance is tailored via design factors, with ISACA offering certificates like COBIT 2019 Foundation for individuals.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed annually or upon significant changes in design factors like strategy or risk profile.** COBIT 2019's CMMI-based performance management recommends regular capability reviews (levels 0-5) via MEA objectives, with ongoing monitoring through KPIs tied to the goals cascade, enabling dynamic adjustments in the governance system workflow.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirectly, lacking COBIT-aligned EGIT may expose organizations to regulatory risks, audit findings, or operational failures in I&T governance, as its 40 objectives and MEA domain provide evidence for demonstrating value creation, risk optimization, and conformance.

Can **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles.** Its openness, conceptual model, and alignment principle enable integration of its 40 objectives and components with standards, using design factors and toolkits for crosswalks that maximize consistency, automation, and enterprise-wide interoperability.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using the six governance system principles and 11 design factors.** This initiates the design workflow in the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, cascading stakeholder needs to enterprise goals, assessing current capabilities via CPM (levels 0-5), and scoping the initial governance system for tailored prioritization.

SAFe vs COBIT | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, enabling fast value flow in IT ops. COBIT governs I&T enterprise-wide, aligning strategy with risk management. Companies adopt SAFe for agility at scale; COBIT for compliance and oversight.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Organizes 50-125 people into synchronized Agile Release Trains
Delivers value via fixed 8-12 week Program Increments
Applies 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles for flow optimization
Drives Business Agility through seven interconnected competencies
Scales via four configurations from Essential to Full

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

11 design factors for tailored governance systems
40 objectives across 5 domains EDM-APO-BAI-DSS-MEA
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 performance management
Goals cascade aligns stakeholders to IT metrics
Seven components enable holistic IT governance

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0) is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to achieve Business Agility, coordinating hundreds of teams in software and IT operations via structured patterns from team to portfolio levels.

Key Components

10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., economic view, value flow, decentralization)
Seven core competencies (Lean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, Portfolio Management, etc.)
Agile Release Trains (ARTs), Program Increments (PIs), roles like RTE/Product Management
Four configurations: Essential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full
No mandatory certification; voluntary knowledge base with academy accreditations

Why Organizations Use It

Drives 20-50% faster time-to-market, 30-75% productivity gains, quality improvements. Aligns strategy-execution, embeds compliance (GDPR/SOC 2), boosts engagement. Voluntary adoption for competitive agility in regulated industries like finance/healthcare.

Implementation Overview

Follow **Implementation Roadmapvalue stream mapping, leadership training (SAFe Agilist), phased ART launches. Applies to large enterprises globally; tools like Jira Align/Vanta aid. SPC coaching recommended; success via PI Planning/Inspect & Adapt.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology, is a flexible IT governance and management framework from ISACA. It enables organizations to create IT value, manage risks, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into tailored governance systems via a design workflow with 11 design factors and a goals cascade.

Key Components

**Five domainsEDM (Evaluate, Direct, Monitor), APO, BAI, DSS, MEA
40 objectives in the core model
Six governance principles and seven components (processes, structures, information, etc.)
CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5); assessments, no certification

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT strategy with business goals for value delivery
Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) and audit via MEA
Reduces risks through holistic, dynamic governance
Builds board trust and competitive IT agility

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess maturity, design scope, pilot objectives, monitor
Applies to all sizes/industries; requires training, RACI, toolkits
Voluntary; ISACA certificates enhance capability (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	COBIT
Scope	Scaling Agile for software/IT delivery	Enterprise I&T governance/management
Industry	Software, IT ops, regulated sectors	All industries, esp. regulated finance/health
Nature	Voluntary agile scaling framework	Voluntary IT governance framework
Testing	PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Capability assessments, MEA audits
Penalties	No formal penalties, implementation risks	No legal penalties, compliance risks

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for software/IT delivery

COBIT

Enterprise I&T governance/management

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT ops, regulated sectors

COBIT

All industries, esp. regulated finance/health

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary agile scaling framework

COBIT

Voluntary IT governance framework

Testing

SAFe

PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

COBIT

Capability assessments, MEA audits

Penalties

SAFe

No formal penalties, implementation risks

COBIT

No legal penalties, compliance risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and COBIT

SAFe FAQ

COBIT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27032 vs WELL

Explore ISO 27032 vs WELL: cybersecurity guidelines for internet threats meet healthy building standards. Secure data & boost wellness—compare strategies now!

SOX vs IATF 16949

Compare SOX vs IATF 16949: SOX mandates financial controls & CEO certifications for publics; IATF drives automotive quality via core tools & risk thinking. Uncover key diffs, strategies & compliance tips now!

CMMC vs SAMA CSF

Compare CMMC vs SAMA CSF: DoD's 3-tier NIST-based cert for DIB vs Saudi finance's 6-level maturity model. Unlock strategies, pitfalls & compliance paths. Secure your future now!

SAFe

COBIT

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

COBIT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

Can SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

Can COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27032 vs WELL

SOX vs IATF 16949

CMMC vs SAMA CSF