What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to achieve Business Agility by scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises through alignment, collaboration, and delivery among hundreds of teams.** SAFe 6.0 integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., economic view, systems thinking, organize around value) with seven core competencies like Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture, enabling faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement via structures such as Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 people.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility.** Professionally, large enterprises with 50+ teams in software development or IT operations—such as those at Philips or NASA—adopt it to scale beyond single-team Agile, with over 20,000 enterprises and 1 million certified practitioners using its configurations from Essential to Full SAFe.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification for core implementation.** Success relies on internal practices like PI Planning and Inspect & Adapt, though Scaled Agile, Inc. offers voluntary certifications (e.g., SAFe Agilist, RTE) via its academy, with SPC-led training recommended for implementations involving ARTs and portfolios.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously through Inspect & Adapt workshops at the end of each Program Increment (PI) of 8-12 weeks.** Maturity assessments, like value stream mapping or HCL-style evaluations, occur pre-implementation and iteratively to measure competencies, flow metrics, and PI Objectives, ensuring relentless improvement without fixed external cadences.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe carries no legal penalties, as it is not a regulatory standard.** Internal risks include failed enterprise agility, such as siloed teams, dependency chaos, 30-70% transformation failure rates, and lost benefits like 20-50% faster time-to-market or 30-75% productivity gains, potentially stalling strategic alignment in scaled environments.

An **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, LeSS, and DevOps for hybrid implementations.** Its Essential configuration aligns with team-level Scrum (2-week iterations), while ARTs and PIs extend to DevOps pipelines; tools like Jira Align and SpiraPlan facilitate artifact mapping across configurations without prescriptive dependencies.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to conduct Leading SAFe training for executives and form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE).** Follow the Implementation Roadmap: train via SAFe Agilist certification, perform value stream mapping, and identify ARTs/personnel before launching Essential SAFe with PI Planning.

What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework that harmonizes requirements from over 60 authoritative sources into a single assurance program for assess once, report many outcomes.** It consolidates controls across 19 domains, using risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors, and a maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed) to ensure operational effectiveness. This enables standardized third-party assurance via MyCSF platform, validated assessments, and certifications like e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), and r2 (tailored, 2-year validity).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally mandated to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework.** Professionally, it is required by contract for healthcare business associates, covered entities, payers, providers, and vendors handling PHI/ePHI, where customers demand certified assurance. Adoption extends to financial services, cloud providers, and regulated sectors needing harmonized compliance for HIPAA-mapped reporting, with reliance by regulators, insurers, and partners via RDS-shared validated reports.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**HITRUST CSF requires external audits by Authorized External Assessors for validated assessments and certification.** Self-assessments via MyCSF provide readiness insights but lack third-party validation. Certifications (e1/i1/r2) involve evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans), HITRUST centralized QA review, and issuance of formal letters/reports, ensuring standardized assurance across maturity-scored controls.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF assessments should be performed annually for e1/i1 certifications and every two years for r2 with a required interim review at one year.** MyCSF enables ongoing readiness monitoring, while validated assessments confirm sustained maturity (e.g., 3+ rating legacy threshold). Controls must operate ~90 days pre-fieldwork, with recertification aligning to validity periods post-HITRUST QA.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to lost contracts, exclusion from healthcare ecosystems, and higher cyber insurance premiums.** Contractual mandates from payers/providers deny market access; uncertified vendors face duplicative audits, sales friction, and reliance party distrust, amplifying regulatory risks like HIPAA fines via unproven controls.

An **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings to over 60 frameworks, enabling requirement-level rollups for assess once, report many reporting.** MyCSF generates scorecards for HIPAA Security Rule, NIST SP 800-53/NIST CSF, ISO 27001/27002, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, PCI DSS, GDPR, FedRAMP, and others, with cross-references ensuring traceability from CSF domains to external standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF for scoping via structured risk factor questionnaires.** Define organizational (size, locations), system (internet exposure, third-party access), and regulatory factors to generate tailored requirement statements, baseline control lists (e.g., e1 44 controls), and inheritance opportunities, establishing the assessment boundary and remediation roadmap.

SAFe vs HITRUST CSF

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Enterprise framework scaling Lean-Agile for Business Agility

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, enabling business agility through ARTs and PIs. HITRUST CSF certifies security controls for regulated industries like healthcare. Companies adopt SAFe for faster time-to-market; HITRUST for compliance assurance and third-party trust.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Agile Release Trains synchronize 50-125 teams
Program Increments enable 8-12 week cadences
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles guide scaling
Scalable configurations from Essential to Full SAFe
Seven core competencies drive Business Agility

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into certifiable controls
Risk-based tailoring via scoping factors
Five-level maturity scoring model
MyCSF platform for assessments and inheritance
Tiered certifications e1, i1, r2

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0) is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to align strategy, execution, and operations, focusing on Business Agility in large-scale software and IT environments.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams delivering value in Program Increments (PIs).
**10 Lean-Agile PrinciplesImmutable foundation like economic view and value flow.
**Seven Core CompetenciesIncluding Lean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, and Continuous Learning Culture.
**ConfigurationsEssential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full SAFe. No formal certification for organizations, but individual trainings like SAFe Agilist exist.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), productivity gains (30-75%), and quality improvements. Enhances alignment, employee engagement, and compliance in regulated industries. Builds competitive edge through flow optimization and dual operating systems balancing hierarchy with agility.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: value stream mapping, leadership training, ART launches via PI Planning. Applies to large enterprises in software/IT; tools like Jira Align aid. SPC-led rollouts ensure success, with ongoing Inspect & Adapt for improvement.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

The HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ authoritative sources like HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides risk-tailored, scalable security and privacy assurance, originally for healthcare but now industry-agnostic.

Key Components

Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications across 19 domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management).
Five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed).
Risk factors for tailoring (organizational, system, regulatory).
Tiered offerings: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).

Why Organizations Use It

Enables "assess once, report many" for multi-regulatory compliance.
Delivers independent certification for stakeholder trust.
Reduces third-party risk and audit fatigue.
Provides market differentiation and breach reduction (99.4% breach-free).

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping via MyCSF, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by assessors.
Targets regulated sectors (healthcare, finance); 12-18 months typical.
Requires evidence management, policies, and continuous monitoring.

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	HITRUST CSF
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery	Security/privacy controls across 19 domains
Industry	Software, IT ops, all enterprise sizes globally	Healthcare primary, regulated sectors worldwide
Nature	Voluntary agile scaling framework	Certifiable security assurance program
Testing	PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Validated assessments by external assessors
Penalties	No penalties, implementation failure risks	No certification, loss of market trust

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery

HITRUST CSF

Security/privacy controls across 19 domains

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT ops, all enterprise sizes globally

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare primary, regulated sectors worldwide

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary agile scaling framework

HITRUST CSF

Certifiable security assurance program

Testing

SAFe

PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

HITRUST CSF

Validated assessments by external assessors

Penalties

SAFe

No penalties, implementation failure risks

HITRUST CSF

No certification, loss of market trust

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and HITRUST CSF

SAFe FAQ

HITRUST CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HIPAA vs ISO 28000

Compare HIPAA vs ISO 28000: HIPAA protects health data privacy/security; ISO 28000 fortifies supply chains. Uncover differences, synergies & strategies for seamless compliance now!

EMAS vs GDPR UK

Discover EMAS vs UK GDPR: EU voluntary eco-scheme meets mandatory data protection law. Master compliance differences, synergies & strategies for UK success now.

IEC 62443 vs SAMA CSF

IEC 62443 vs SAMA CSF: Compare OT industrial cybersecurity (zones, SLs, ISASecure) with Saudi financial resilience framework. Unlock maturity models, governance & compliance strategies for robust protection. Dive in!

SAFe

HITRUST CSF

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

HITRUST CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

An SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

An HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HIPAA vs ISO 28000

EMAS vs GDPR UK

IEC 62443 vs SAMA CSF