Standards Comparison

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi mandatory cybersecurity framework for financial institutions

    VS

    Basel III

    Mandatory
    2010

    Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards.

    Quick Verdict

    SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms, while Basel III enforces capital and liquidity resilience for global banks. Saudi institutions adopt SAMA CSF for regulatory compliance; international banks use Basel III to ensure solvency and market trust.

    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates minimum Maturity Level 3 with structured controls
    • Four core domains: Governance, Risk, Operations, Third-Party
    • Principle-based with detailed sector-specific control considerations
    • Requires independent Saudi CISO and Board cyber committee
    • Aligns NIST/ISO but mandates payment/e-banking specifics
    Financial Risk Management

    Basel III

    Basel III Post-Crisis Prudential Reforms

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Strengthened CET1 capital minimum (4.5% of RWA)
    • Capital conservation and systemic risk buffers
    • Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop (3%)
    • Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
    • Net Stable Funding Ratio for one-year horizon

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF) Version 1.0 (May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity governance, controls, and maturity, ensuring detection, resistance, response, and recovery from threats. Scope covers all information assets in banks, insurers, finance firms, credit bureaus, and market infrastructures.

    Key Components

    • Four domains: Cyber Security Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
    • Subdomains with principles, objectives, control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
    • Six-level maturity model (Level 0-5; minimum Level 3: structured policies/standards/procedures, KPIs).
    • Aligns with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; self-assessment and SAMA audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, audits, operational disruptions.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, improves efficiency/uptime.
    • Builds trust, enables partnerships, competitive edge in Vision 2030 digital economy.
    • Integrates risk intelligence for better decisions, insurance, ERM.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design, deployment, operate, audit/improve.
    • Cross-functional: Board sponsorship, CISO-led, tools (SIEM, IAM, GRC).
    • Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size; periodic self-assessments, no external certification.

    Basel III Details

    What It Is

    Basel III is the international regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-global financial crisis. It sets prudential standards for banks to enhance resilience through improved capital quality, leverage constraints, and liquidity requirements. Its risk-based approach combines minimum ratios with buffers and non-risk metrics.

    Key Components

    • **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, liquidity ratios like CET1 4.5%, leverage 3%, LCR/NSFR); Pillar 2 (supervisory review, ICAAP); Pillar 3 (disclosures for comparability).
    • Buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB).
    • Output floor limiting internal model benefits.
    • No formal certification; compliance via national implementation and supervisory oversight.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Banks adopt it for regulatory compliance, as jurisdictions enforce via domestic law. It mitigates systemic risk, improves funding costs, enhances market confidence, and supports strategic balance-sheet optimization amid model constraints.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, model validation, governance. Applies to internationally active banks globally; involves QIS, parallel runs, Pillar 3 reporting. No external certification but RCAP assessments ensure consistency. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity controls across 4 domains
    Basel III
    Capital, liquidity, leverage requirements

    Industry

    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial institutions only
    Basel III
    Internationally active banks globally

    Nature

    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory cybersecurity framework
    Basel III
    Global prudential banking standards

    Testing

    SAMA CSF
    Periodic self-assessments, maturity model
    Basel III
    Stress tests, ICAAP, disclosures

    Penalties

    SAMA CSF
    Regulatory scrutiny, remediation demands
    Basel III
    Fines, license restrictions, capital add-ons

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SAMA CSF and Basel III

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    Basel III FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages