SAMA CSF
Saudi mandatory cybersecurity framework for financial institutions
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards.
Quick Verdict
SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms, while Basel III enforces capital and liquidity resilience for global banks. Saudi institutions adopt SAMA CSF for regulatory compliance; international banks use Basel III to ensure solvency and market trust.
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Mandates minimum Maturity Level 3 with structured controls
- Four core domains: Governance, Risk, Operations, Third-Party
- Principle-based with detailed sector-specific control considerations
- Requires independent Saudi CISO and Board cyber committee
- Aligns NIST/ISO but mandates payment/e-banking specifics
Basel III
Basel III Post-Crisis Prudential Reforms
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital minimum (4.5% of RWA)
- Capital conservation and systemic risk buffers
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop (3%)
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for one-year horizon
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF) Version 1.0 (May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity governance, controls, and maturity, ensuring detection, resistance, response, and recovery from threats. Scope covers all information assets in banks, insurers, finance firms, credit bureaus, and market infrastructures.
Key Components
- Four domains: Cyber Security Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Subdomains with principles, objectives, control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
- Six-level maturity model (Level 0-5; minimum Level 3: structured policies/standards/procedures, KPIs).
- Aligns with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; self-assessment and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, audits, operational disruptions.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, improves efficiency/uptime.
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, competitive edge in Vision 2030 digital economy.
- Integrates risk intelligence for better decisions, insurance, ERM.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design, deployment, operate, audit/improve.
- Cross-functional: Board sponsorship, CISO-led, tools (SIEM, IAM, GRC).
- Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size; periodic self-assessments, no external certification.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the international regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-global financial crisis. It sets prudential standards for banks to enhance resilience through improved capital quality, leverage constraints, and liquidity requirements. Its risk-based approach combines minimum ratios with buffers and non-risk metrics.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, liquidity ratios like CET1 4.5%, leverage 3%, LCR/NSFR); Pillar 2 (supervisory review, ICAAP); Pillar 3 (disclosures for comparability).
- Buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB).
- Output floor limiting internal model benefits.
- No formal certification; compliance via national implementation and supervisory oversight.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks adopt it for regulatory compliance, as jurisdictions enforce via domestic law. It mitigates systemic risk, improves funding costs, enhances market confidence, and supports strategic balance-sheet optimization amid model constraints.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, model validation, governance. Applies to internationally active banks globally; involves QIS, parallel runs, Pillar 3 reporting. No external certification but RCAP assessments ensure consistency. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | SAMA CSF | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity controls across 4 domains | Capital, liquidity, leverage requirements |
| Industry | Saudi financial institutions only | Internationally active banks globally |
| Nature | Mandatory cybersecurity framework | Global prudential banking standards |
| Testing | Periodic self-assessments, maturity model | Stress tests, ICAAP, disclosures |
| Penalties | Regulatory scrutiny, remediation demands | Fines, license restrictions, capital add-ons |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SAMA CSF and Basel III
SAMA CSF FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments
Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
C-TPAT vs ISO 22301
Compare C-TPAT vs ISO 22301: CBP's trusted trader security vs ISO's BCM resilience. Key diffs in criteria, validation, supply chain benefits. Secure operations—discover the best fit now!
ISO 56002 vs NERC CIP
ISO 56002 vs NERC CIP: Compare innovation management frameworks with grid cybersecurity standards. Drive strategic value while ensuring BES compliance—essential guide for utilities.
ITIL vs APRA CPS 234
Compare ITIL vs APRA CPS 234: Align ITSM best practices with cyber resilience mandates for finance. Governance, controls & testing insights. Boost compliance now!