Six Sigma
Data-driven methodology reducing process variation and defects
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
Six Sigma drives process excellence via DMAIC across industries voluntarily, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial firms with strict testing and APRA notifications to ensure cyber resilience.
Six Sigma
ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma Process Improvement
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Third-party capability and control assessments
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Six Sigma Details
What It Is
Six Sigma is a data-driven process improvement framework, anchored by ISO 13053:2011, focusing on defect prevention and variation reduction. It employs the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, targeting 3.4 defects per million opportunities.
Key Components
- Structured DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like project charters, SIPOC maps, and FMEAs.
- **Belt hierarchyChampions, Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts.
- Statistical tools including MSA, hypothesis testing, DOE, and SPC.
- Governance via tollgates, control plans; certification through bodies like ASQ.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives financial savings (e.g., GE's $1B+), customer satisfaction, and risk reduction. Voluntary adoption boosts competitiveness; integrates with Lean/ISO for compliance. Builds data-driven culture and stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution. Suits all sizes/industries; 6-12 months initial, ongoing sustainment. No universal certification, but ASQ CSSBB benchmarks competence. (178 words)
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory prudential regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance, controls, testing, and rapid notification.
Key Components
- **GovernanceBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles, policy framework.
- **Risk ManagementAsset classification by criticality/sensitivity, third-party assessments.
- **ControlsLifecycle protections, detection/response mechanisms.
- **AssuranceSystematic testing, internal audit reviews.
- **Reporting72-hour material incident notifications, 10-day control weakness alerts. Outcomes-focused, no fixed control count; aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures regulatory compliance avoiding penalties and scrutiny.
- Enhances cyber resilience and operational continuity.
- Manages third-party risks effectively.
- Builds stakeholder trust, reduces incident impacts.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, asset inventory, policy/controls, testing programs, assurance. Targets APRA-regulated banks, insurers, super funds; proportional to size/risk. Ongoing internal audit, no certification but APRA supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Six Sigma | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Process improvement, defect reduction, DMAIC methodology | Information security governance, cyber resilience, controls |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any organization size | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology, certification-based, no enforcement | Mandatory prudential regulation, APRA enforcement powers |
| Testing | Statistical validation, MSA, capability analysis in projects | Systematic independent control testing, annual reviews |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, only certification loss | Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Six Sigma and APRA CPS 234
Six Sigma FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
BREEAM vs ISO 17025
Discover BREEAM vs ISO 17025: Sustainability certification for buildings meets lab competence standards. Ensure emissions testing compliance, boost ratings to Outstanding. Compare key differences now!
LGPD vs NERC CIP
Discover LGPD vs NERC CIP: Compare Brazil's GDPR-like data privacy law with U.S. grid cybersecurity standards. Key differences, compliance strategies, and global insights for risk managers.
K-PIPA vs HITRUST CSF
Compare K-PIPA vs HITRUST CSF: Unpack South Korea's consent-driven privacy law against the certifiable security framework. Key gaps, compliance strategies for global firms. Optimize now!