Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    Data-driven methodology reducing process variation and defects

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives process excellence via DMAIC across industries voluntarily, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial firms with strict testing and APRA notifications to ensure cyber resilience.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma Process Improvement

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Third-party capability and control assessments
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a data-driven process improvement framework, anchored by ISO 13053:2011, focusing on defect prevention and variation reduction. It employs the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, targeting 3.4 defects per million opportunities.

    Key Components

    • Structured DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like project charters, SIPOC maps, and FMEAs.
    • **Belt hierarchyChampions, Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts.
    • Statistical tools including MSA, hypothesis testing, DOE, and SPC.
    • Governance via tollgates, control plans; certification through bodies like ASQ.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives financial savings (e.g., GE's $1B+), customer satisfaction, and risk reduction. Voluntary adoption boosts competitiveness; integrates with Lean/ISO for compliance. Builds data-driven culture and stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased rollout: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution. Suits all sizes/industries; 6-12 months initial, ongoing sustainment. No universal certification, but ASQ CSSBB benchmarks competence. (178 words)

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory prudential regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance, controls, testing, and rapid notification.

    Key Components

    • **GovernanceBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles, policy framework.
    • **Risk ManagementAsset classification by criticality/sensitivity, third-party assessments.
    • **ControlsLifecycle protections, detection/response mechanisms.
    • **AssuranceSystematic testing, internal audit reviews.
    • **Reporting72-hour material incident notifications, 10-day control weakness alerts. Outcomes-focused, no fixed control count; aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures regulatory compliance avoiding penalties and scrutiny.
    • Enhances cyber resilience and operational continuity.
    • Manages third-party risks effectively.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, reduces incident impacts.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, asset inventory, policy/controls, testing programs, assurance. Targets APRA-regulated banks, insurers, super funds; proportional to size/risk. Ongoing internal audit, no certification but APRA supervision.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement, defect reduction, DMAIC methodology
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security governance, cyber resilience, controls

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries worldwide, any organization size
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super)

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary methodology, certification-based, no enforcement
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation, APRA enforcement powers

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    Statistical validation, MSA, capability analysis in projects
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent control testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No legal penalties, only certification loss
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and APRA CPS 234

    Six Sigma FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages