What is the primary objective of **Six Sigma**?

**The primary objective of Six Sigma is to improve process performance by reducing variation and defects to achieve 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO), accounting for a 1.5σ long-term shift.** This data-driven methodology employs DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, linking improvements to strategic priorities via governance, belts (Champions, Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts), and metrics like sigma levels, Cp/Cpk, and financial returns.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **Six Sigma**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with Six Sigma, as it is a voluntary, data-driven methodology rather than a mandated regulation.** Professionally, C-suite executives, Champions, and belts (Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts) in deploying organizations must adhere to its governance, tollgates, and project requirements for credible execution, with ASQ CSSBB demanding 3 years' experience and verified projects.

Does **Six Sigma** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Six Sigma does not require external audits or third-party certification for implementation, though certifications like ASQ CSSBB provide recognized benchmarks.** ASQ credentials mandate proctored exams (165 questions, 4+ hours), experience, and project affidavits under ANSI/ISO 17024 accreditation; organizational deployments rely on internal tollgates, Champions, and sustainment via SPC/control plans.

How often should an assessment for **Six Sigma** be performed?

**Six Sigma assessments occur via tollgate reviews at the end of each DMAIC phase (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), typically spanning 4-6 months per project.** Ongoing sustainment includes periodic SPC monitoring, control plan audits, and management reviews to detect variation; program-level maturity checks align with strategic cycles, not fixed intervals.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **Six Sigma**?

**Non-compliance with Six Sigma carries no legal penalties, as it is a voluntary methodology, but results in high project failure rates exceeding 60%.** Internal consequences include unrealized savings (e.g., Motorola's $17B benchmark), process regression without control plans/SPC, wasted training investments, and strategic misalignment, as seen in deployments lacking leadership sponsorship.

An **Six Sigma** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, Six Sigma maps effectively to quality management frameworks through shared elements like process control, audits, and continuous improvement.** DMAIC tollgates align with stage-gate reviews, control plans with SOPs, and MSA/SPC with documentation requirements; ISO 13053:2011 formalizes Six Sigma processes, enabling integration without cross-referencing specifics.

What is the first step to begin implementing **Six Sigma**?

**The first step to implement Six Sigma is developing a signed Project Charter in the Define phase, establishing business case, SMART goals, scope, VOC-to-CTQ translation, SIPOC map, timeline, and Champion sponsorship.** This tollgate-approved artifact ensures strategic alignment, prevents scope creep, and secures resources for baseline measurement.

What is the primary objective of **FSSC 22000**?

**FSSC 22000's primary objective is to ensure certified organizations consistently provide safe food through a GFSI-benchmarked Food Safety Management System (FSMS).** It integrates **ISO 22000:2018** (clauses 4–10 for PDCA-based management), sector-specific **PRPs** (e.g., **ISO/TS 22002-1** for food manufacturing), and **FSSC Additional Requirements** (e.g., food defense, allergen management). This delivers independent third-party certification across food chain categories (B–K per **ISO 22003-1:2022**), enabling supply-chain trust via a public register of 40,059 certified sites.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FSSC 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with FSSC 22000, as it is a voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme.** Professionally, it is mandated by retailers, manufacturers, and foodservice operators for suppliers in categories like food manufacturing (C), packaging (I), transport/storage (G), and brokering (FII). Certification is essential for global trade access, with 134 licensed Certification Bodies ensuring consistency.

Does **FSSC 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, FSSC 22000 mandates external audits and third-party certification by licensed Certification Bodies accredited per ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 and ISO 22003-1:2022.** Initial certification involves Stage 1 (readiness) and Stage 2 (implementation) audits, with at least 50% of time on operational controls/PRPs. Annual surveillance and triennial recertification follow, supported by FSSC's Integrity Program.

How often should an assessment for **FSSC 22000** be performed?

**FSSC 22000 requires annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years by licensed Certification Bodies.** Internal audits must cover the full FSMS (ISO 22000, PRPs, Additional Requirements) at least annually, with management reviews incorporating performance data. PRP verification occurs via risk-based monthly site inspections; programs like environmental monitoring and food defense are reviewed annually or upon changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FSSC 22000**?

**Non-compliance with FSSC 22000 results in nonconformity classification, corrective action demands, potential certificate suspension or withdrawal by the Certification Body.** Certified sites must notify CBs within **three working days** of serious events (e.g., recalls, shutdowns). Repeated major nonconformities trigger Integrity Program actions; unaddressed issues lead to market exclusion by GFSI-demanding buyers.

An **FSSC 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, FSSC 22000 maps directly to ISO-based frameworks due to its ISO 22000:2018 core using the harmonized High-Level Structure.** Shared elements include PDCA cycles, leadership (Clause 5), risk planning (Clause 6), and performance evaluation (Clause 9), enabling integration with standards sharing this structure while layering PRPs and Additional Requirements atop.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FSSC 22000**?

**The first step to implement FSSC 22000 is to define the certification scope aligned to ISO 22003-1:2022 categories (e.g., C for manufacturing) and conduct a gap analysis against ISO 22000:2018, applicable PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002-1), and FSSC Additional Requirements.** Secure executive commitment via a Top Management meeting, then download free Scheme Parts 1–5 from Foundation FSSC for self-assessment.

Six Sigma vs FSSC 22000

Standards Comparison

Six Sigma

Voluntary

1986

De facto framework for data-driven defect reduction

FSSC 22000

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for food safety management.

Quick Verdict

Six Sigma drives process excellence via DMAIC across industries for cost savings, while FSSC 22000 ensures food safety compliance through ISO 22000, PRPs and audits. Companies adopt Six Sigma for efficiency gains; FSSC 22000 for market access and regulatory trust.

Process Improvement

Six Sigma

ISO 13053:2011 Quantitative Methods in Process Improvement

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

DMAIC structured methodology for existing processes
Belt hierarchy with Champions and Black Belts
Statistical analysis and measurement system validation
Tollgate governance linking to strategic priorities
SPC control plans for gain sustainment

Food Safety

FSSC 22000

Food Safety System Certification 22000

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Combines ISO 22000, PRPs, and additional requirements
GFSI-benchmarked for global food chain recognition
Food defense, fraud, and allergen management plans
Category-specific scope across food chain B-K
Leadership-driven food safety culture objectives

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

Six Sigma Details

What It Is

Six Sigma is a de facto industry standard and methodology, anchored by ISO 13053:2011, focused on reducing process variation and defects through data-driven decisions. It employs a disciplined DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) lifecycle for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, targeting 3.4 DPMO after a 1.5σ shift.

Key Components

Structured DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like charters, SIPOC, MSA, FMEA.
**Belt systemChampions, Master/Black/Green Belts for roles and training.
Statistical tools (SPC, DOE, Gage R&R) and governance (tollgates, control plans).
Certification via bodies like ASQ CSSBB, emphasizing projects and exams.

Why Organizations Use It

Delivers financial savings (e.g., GE $1B+), risk reduction, customer CTQ alignment. Voluntary but strategic for quality, compliance integration (ISO 9001), competitive edge in manufacturing, healthcare, finance.

Implementation Overview

Phased rollout: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution. Applies enterprise-wide, cross-industry; requires 12-18 months, belts, software like Minitab. No formal audits but internal tollgates ensure sustainment.

FSSC 22000 Details

What It Is

FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). Its primary purpose is to ensure organizations in the food chain produce safe food through a unified, auditable framework spanning primary handling, manufacturing, packaging, logistics, and more. It employs a risk-based, PDCA management system approach integrating ISO 22000:2018.

Key Components

**Three pillarsISO 22000:2018 (clauses 4-10), sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, fraud, allergens).
Covers 10+ food chain categories (B-K).
Built on HACCP principles with layered controls (PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs).
Certification model via licensed bodies per ISO 22003-1:2022.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer/buyer demands for GFSI recognition.
Enhances supply-chain trust, reduces audit duplication.
Manages risks like fraud, defense, allergens; supports SDGs.
Builds competitive edge via global acceptance (40,000+ sites).

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, audits.
Applies to all food chain sizes/sectors worldwide.
Requires Stage 1/2 certification audits, surveillance/recertification.

Key Differences

Aspect	Six Sigma	FSSC 22000
Scope	Process improvement, variation reduction, DMAIC methodology	Food safety management, HACCP, PRPs, hazard control
Industry	All industries, manufacturing to services worldwide	Food chain sectors, manufacturing to packaging globally
Nature	Voluntary methodology, belt certifications, no single body	GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme, mandatory audits
Testing	Project tollgates, statistical validation, no formal audits	CB audits, surveillance/recertification, PRP verification
Penalties	No penalties, loss of project gains or certification	Certification suspension/revocation, market access loss

Scope

Six Sigma

Process improvement, variation reduction, DMAIC methodology

FSSC 22000

Food safety management, HACCP, PRPs, hazard control

Industry

Six Sigma

All industries, manufacturing to services worldwide

FSSC 22000

Food chain sectors, manufacturing to packaging globally

Nature

Six Sigma

Voluntary methodology, belt certifications, no single body

FSSC 22000

GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme, mandatory audits

Testing

Six Sigma

Project tollgates, statistical validation, no formal audits

FSSC 22000

CB audits, surveillance/recertification, PRP verification

Penalties

Six Sigma

No penalties, loss of project gains or certification

FSSC 22000

Certification suspension/revocation, market access loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Six Sigma and FSSC 22000

Six Sigma FAQ

FSSC 22000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint

Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 20000 vs APRA CPS 234

Compare ISO 20000 vs APRA CPS 234: Master IT service management & cyber resilience for finance. Key diffs in governance, controls, testing. Align for compliance—elevate security today!

PRINCE2 vs COPPA

PRINCE2 vs COPPA: Compare project mgmt mastery (7 principles, practices, processes) with child privacy rules. Boost governance, compliance & success—dive in now!

CCPA vs ISO 20000

Unravel CCPA vs ISO 20000: Compare privacy rights law with service management standard. Master overlaps in data security, vendor controls & compliance for resilient IT. Optimize now!

Six Sigma

FSSC 22000

Quick Verdict

Six Sigma

Key Features

FSSC 22000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

Six Sigma Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

FSSC 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Six Sigma FAQ

What is the primary objective of Six Sigma?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with Six Sigma?

Does Six Sigma require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for Six Sigma be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Six Sigma?

An Six Sigma be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing Six Sigma?

FSSC 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of FSSC 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FSSC 22000?

Does FSSC 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FSSC 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FSSC 22000?

An FSSC 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FSSC 22000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 20000 vs APRA CPS 234

PRINCE2 vs COPPA

CCPA vs ISO 20000