Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    Data-driven framework for defect reduction and variation control

    VS

    ISO 45001

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for occupational health and safety management systems

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives process excellence through DMAIC and defect reduction across industries, while ISO 45001 establishes safety management systems for hazard prevention. Companies adopt Six Sigma for efficiency gains and ISO 45001 for worker protection and compliance.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma Process Improvement

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Structured DMAIC methodology for process improvement
    • Belt hierarchy with Champions and Black Belts
    • Data-driven statistical analysis and MSA validation
    • Tollgate reviews and project charter governance
    • 3.4 DPMO benchmark for defect reduction
    Occupational Health & Safety

    ISO 45001

    ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Top management accountability and worker participation
    • Risk-based planning with hierarchy of controls
    • Operational controls for contractors and change management
    • Performance evaluation via KPIs, audits, reviews
    • Continual improvement through root cause analysis

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a de facto management framework (ISO 13053:2011 referenced) for process improvement through variation reduction and defect prevention. Its primary purpose is achieving near-perfect quality via data-driven decisions, targeting 3.4 DPMO after a 1.5σ shift. Core approach: DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) for existing processes; DMADV for new designs.

    Key Components

    • Structured DMAIC lifecycle with tollgates and deliverables (charters, SIPOC, FMEA).
    • Belt roles: Champions, Master/Black/Green Belts.
    • Statistical tools: MSA (Gage R&R), SPC, DOE, capability indices (Cpk).
    • Governance via leadership sponsorship; no single certification but ASQ CSSBB benchmark.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives financial savings (e.g., GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, risk reduction. Voluntary adoption for competitive edge in manufacturing, healthcare, finance. Builds data culture, stakeholder trust via proven ROI.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: executive alignment, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution, sustainment. Applies enterprise-wide; 12-18 months typical. Involves training, audits; integrates with Lean/ISO for scalability.

    ISO 45001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 45001:2018 is the international standard for Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) Management Systems (OHSMS). It establishes requirements to prevent work-related injury and ill health, proactively improving OH&S performance through a risk-based approach and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure (Annex SL) for integration with standards like ISO 9001 and 14001.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–10: context, leadership and worker participation, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: hazard identification, hierarchy of controls, contractor management, emergency preparedness.
    • Scalable, process-oriented requirements supporting optional third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces incidents, legal risks, and costs; enhances resilience and insurance savings.
    • Drives safety culture, worker engagement, and compliance.
    • Provides competitive edge via certification, supply-chain advantages, and stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, training, controls, audits, reviews.
    • Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical; certification via accredited bodies involves Stage 1/2 audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement, defect reduction, variation control
    ISO 45001
    Occupational health, safety management, hazard prevention

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries, manufacturing to services
    ISO 45001
    All sectors, high-risk like construction, manufacturing

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary methodology, certification by bodies like ASQ
    ISO 45001
    Voluntary international standard, third-party certification

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    DMAIC projects, tollgates, internal reviews
    ISO 45001
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No legal penalties, program failure risks
    ISO 45001
    No legal penalties, certification loss, regulatory risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and ISO 45001

    Six Sigma FAQ

    ISO 45001 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages