What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data through Type 1 (design at a point in time) or Type 2 (design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports. Security (CC1-CC9) is mandatory, ensuring robust controls like access management (CC6) and risk assessment (CC3).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data (e.g., fintech, HR tech), buyers in RFPs and MSAs demand Type 2 reports for vendor risk assessments, disqualifying non-compliant vendors and extending sales cycles by 3-6 months.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue the attestation report.** Type 1 validates control design; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a minimum 3-month period via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review (e.g., logs, pen tests). No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full 12-month control period, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** Type 1 offers point-in-time checks but lacks operating evidence; enterprises prefer annual Type 2 recertifications, often using prior 9 months plus new 3 months for bridged monitoring.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), and heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** No AICPA fines apply, but absent controls amplify contractual penalties, reputational damage, and investor scrutiny in VRM programs, where 70-80% of SaaS enterprise deals require reports.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and HIPAA via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A (114 controls) and NIST Govern/Detect functions, enabling multi-compliance efficiency without dual audits—e.g., CC6 access controls support GDPR data protection.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against Trust Services Criteria, selecting Security (mandatory) plus relevant optionals like Availability.** Engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K), inventory assets/data flows, and map 50-100 controls using tools like Vanta, prioritizing quick wins like policies and IAM.

What is the primary objective of **IFS Food**?

**IFS Food's primary objective is to audit product and process compliance ensuring manufacturers produce safe, legal products meeting customer specifications.** Version 8 (mandatory from 1 January 2024) uses a **Product and Process Approach (PPA)** with risk-based product sampling, traceability tests, and at least **50% audit time** in production areas to verify food safety, quality, legality, authenticity, and integrity via HACCP, PRPs, and operational controls like food fraud (4.20) and defense (4.21).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **IFS Food**?

**IFS Food applies to food product manufacturers processing food or packing loose products where contamination risk exists.** It targets **site-specific certification** (one legal entity, one address), demanded by European retailers for private-label suppliers. Scope includes all site products/processes; partly outsourced processes require controls (4.4), while fully outsourced/traded products need IFS Broker. Not legally mandated but professionally required for market access.

Does **IFS Food** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, IFS Food mandates external audits by ISO/IEC 17065-accredited certification bodies using approved auditors.** Audits follow PPA with initial/recertification (annual), follow-up/extension as needed. Unannounced audits required at least every third audit since 1 January 2021; certificate issued at **Higher Level (≥95%)** or **Foundation Level (≥75%-<95%)** if no KO/Major nonconformities.

How often should an assessment for **IFS Food** be performed?

**IFS Food requires full recertification audits annually, with internal audits ongoing per 5.1.1 (KO requirement).** Management reviews occur at least annually (1.3); unannounced audits at minimum every third audit. Follow-up audits for Majors within 6 weeks-6 months; extension audits for scope changes/seasonal lines.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **IFS Food**?

**Non-compliance with IFS Food results in certification denial, withdrawal, or downgrade if KO requirements score D (-50%) or Majors occur (-15%).** Certificate withdrawn within 2 working days for recertification failures or unannounced access denial; database notifies stakeholders. No quantified fines, but lost market access, retailer delisting, and repeat audits increase costs.

An **IFS Food** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, IFS Food FAQs stand alone without mapping to other frameworks.** As a GFSI-benchmarked scheme, it shares foundations but differs in annual audits (vs. surveillance models), ISO 17065 accreditation, PPA emphasis, and scoring (Higher/Foundation Levels).

What is the first step to begin implementing **IFS Food**?

**The first step is appointing an ISO/IEC 17065-accredited IFS-approved certification body and conducting a gap analysis against Version 8 and Doctrine.** Define site-specific scope (all products/processes), disclose history/outsourcing, and perform risk-based assessment with PPA simulation, prioritizing 10 KO requirements like governance (1.2.1) and traceability (4.18.1).

SOC 2 vs IFS Food

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organizations' trust services controls

IFS Food

Voluntary

2023

Global certification for food safety and process compliance

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides trust services attestation for tech firms handling data, while IFS Food ensures food safety certification for manufacturers. Tech companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales; food producers pursue IFS for retailer access and compliance.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 reports test operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security CC1-CC9
Flexible scoping of optional Availability, Confidentiality, Privacy
Independent AICPA CPA firm attestation reports
Control mappings to ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR frameworks

Food Safety

IFS Food

International Featured Standards Food Version 8

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Product and Process Approach with traceability tests
Risk-based HACCP and KO critical controls
Annual site-specific audits, 50% on-site
Food fraud and defense vulnerability assessments
Unannounced audits for Star status

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for service organizations. It evaluates controls relevant to Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—security (mandatory), availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy—using a risk-based, control-oriented approach. Reports include Type 1 (design at a point in time) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).

Key Components

Five TSC anchored by Security (CC1-CC9) common criteria
50-100 controls across policies, technical safeguards, monitoring
Built on COSO principles for control environments
CPA attestation model with unqualified opinions ideal

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates enterprise sales by streamlining vendor due diligence
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience (e.g., 99.99% uptime)
Builds stakeholder trust in SaaS/cloud data handling
Voluntary yet market-driven moat; maps 70-80% to ISO 27001/NIST

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis, control deployment, monitoring, CPA audit
Targets service providers (SaaS, fintech); scalable via automation (Vanta)
6-12 months typical; annual recertification with bridge letters

IFS Food Details

What It Is

IFS Food Version 8 is the International Featured Standards Food, a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers. It audits product and process compliance ensuring safe, legal, authentic products meeting customer specs via risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification.

Key Components

Governance, HACCP, PRPs, operational controls across 5 sections
200+ requirements, 10 Knock-Out (KO) criteria (e.g., traceability, hygiene)
Built on HACCP, food fraud/defense, integrated pest management
Annual audits scoring Higher (≥95%) or Foundation (≥75%) levels

Why Organizations Use It

European retailer mandates for market access
Reduces duplicate audits, builds supply chain trust
Mitigates recalls, fraud, contamination risks
Enhances reputation via Star status unannounced audits

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, FSMS build, training, validation, certification
Site-specific for food processors globally
Accredited bodies conduct PPA audits, 50% on-site

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	IFS Food
Scope	Data security, availability, confidentiality, privacy	Food safety, quality, legality, process compliance
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally	Food manufacturers, packagers, primarily Europe
Nature	Voluntary AICPA attestation framework	GFSI-recognized certification standard
Testing	Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPAs	Annual on-site product/process audits
Penalties	Lost business, no legal fines	Certification denial, market access loss

Scope

SOC 2

Data security, availability, confidentiality, privacy

IFS Food

Food safety, quality, legality, process compliance

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally

IFS Food

Food manufacturers, packagers, primarily Europe

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA attestation framework

IFS Food

GFSI-recognized certification standard

Testing

SOC 2

Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPAs

IFS Food

Annual on-site product/process audits

Penalties

SOC 2

Lost business, no legal fines

IFS Food

Certification denial, market access loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and IFS Food

SOC 2 FAQ

IFS Food FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates

Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs CMMI

Compare FISMA vs CMMI: Federal cybersecurity law (FISMA/NIST RMF) meets process maturity model (CMMI Levels 1-5). Boost compliance, resilience & performance—discover key differences now.

DORA vs Six Sigma

Explore DORA vs Six Sigma: Financial resilience regulation meets DMAIC defect reduction. Compare compliance, risks & optimization—boost your strategy today!

CAA vs ISO 56002

Explore CAA vs ISO 56002: Clean Air Act regulations meet innovation management standards. Balance compliance, permitting & tech controls with strategic IMS for exec success. Dive in!

SOC 2

IFS Food

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

IFS Food

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

IFS Food Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

IFS Food FAQ

What is the primary objective of IFS Food?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with IFS Food?

Does IFS Food require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for IFS Food be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with IFS Food?

An IFS Food be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing IFS Food?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs CMMI

DORA vs Six Sigma

CAA vs ISO 56002