What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, enabling stakeholders to verify risk mitigation in SaaS and cloud environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework driven by market demands.** It professionally targets service organizations like SaaS, cloud, PaaS, IaaS providers, and data processors handling customer data. Enterprises mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs for vendor risk assessments, especially for deals with $5K+ ACV, disqualifying non-compliant vendors.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm.** Type 1 audits design at a point-in-time; Type 2 verifies operating effectiveness over 3-12 months via sampling tests. Reports include auditor opinion, management assertion, system description, and control test results—no formal "certification" exists, but unqualified Type 2 opinions provide attestation.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to cover full control cycles.** The monitoring period is typically 3-12 months (minimum 3), with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months between audits. Continuous monitoring, quarterly access reviews, and annual penetration tests sustain compliance post-audit.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost business opportunities, as it is not legally enforced but contractually required by enterprises.** Absent a Type 2 report, vendors face RFP disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), higher CAC (20-50%), custom audits, or deal abandonment; breaches amplify liability under SLAs and laws like CCPA, with damages exceeding $1M per incident.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map extensively to other frameworks, with 80% overlap to ISO 27001 and alignments to NIST CSF, HIPAA, and GDPR.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with NIST Govern/Detect and ISO Annex A; AICPA spreadsheets facilitate mappings, reducing duplication for multi-framework compliance in global operations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (Security mandatory, plus optionals like Availability); engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K), inventory assets, and map 50-100 controls using tools like Vanta.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it promotes principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability across all organization sizes and sectors. The framework follows a high-level Annex SL structure with ten clauses, including context analysis, leadership commitment, risk-based planning, operational controls, performance evaluation, and continual improvement via Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a voluntary Type B guidance standard without mandatory requirements.** It applies to all types and sizes of organizations facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal policy obligations, including financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, SMEs, and startups. Professionals such as Chief Compliance Officers, risk committees, and governance officers use it to benchmark CMS effectiveness for regulators, customers, and partners.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it is a non-certifiable Type B guidance document.** Organizations conduct internal audits per ISO 19011, self-assessments, and management reviews (clause 9) to evaluate CMS performance. Alignment is demonstrated through benchmarking, gap analysis, and documented evidence like risk registers and KCIs, without formal certification.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals, with continual monitoring, periodic internal audits, and management reviews at least quarterly.** Clause 9 requires ongoing evaluation of CMS effectiveness via KCIs, risk reassessments triggered by changes (e.g., new obligations), and PDCA cycles. Quarterly Compliance Steering Committee reviews and annual audits ensure proportionality to organizational context and risks.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 19600 carries no direct penalties, as it imposes no mandatory legal requirements.** However, weak CMS alignment exposes organizations to sector-specific risks like regulatory fines (e.g., €12M anti-bribery cases), operational disruptions, reputational damage (15% sales dips), higher insurance costs, and governance failures. Adoption mitigates these by systematizing risk identification and controls.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks due to its Annex SL structure and PDCA alignment.** Its ten clauses integrate with existing systems for quality, risk, environmental, and health/safety management, avoiding duplication. It serves as a direct predecessor to ISO 37301, enabling seamless upgrades via targeted gap-fills on mandatory language and evidence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step to implement ISO 19600 is securing leadership commitment and establishing a Compliance Steering Committee (Phase 0).** Obtain top-management endorsement via a signed charter (clause 5), define CMS scope considering context and obligations (clause 4), and appoint cross-functional oversight to ensure resources, governance principles (direct access, independence), and proportionality.

SOC 2 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization security controls

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides auditable security controls for service organizations via CPA Type 2 reports, while ISO 19600 offers non-certifiable CMS guidelines for all compliance risks. Tech firms adopt SOC 2 for client trust; others use ISO 19600 for broad governance.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 audits verify operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
Mandatory Security with flexible optional Trust Services Criteria
AICPA-attested reports for service organization data controls
Customizable scoping for SaaS and cloud providers
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and NIST frameworks

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based compliance management framework
Principles of good governance and proportionality
Annex SL structure for system integration
PDCA cycle for continual improvement
Scalable guidelines for all organizations

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary audit framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It focuses on Trust Services Criteria (TSC) including security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy, using a principles-based, risk-assessed approach for non-financial assurances.

Key Components

Five **TSCMandatory Security (CC1-CC9) plus optional Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy.
Common Criteria (CC series) form the core with 50-100 controls mapped via spreadsheets.
Built on COSO principles; Type 1 (design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness) reports.
CPA-attested compliance model with annual recertification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives enterprise sales by streamlining due diligence, reducing CAC 20-50%, and unlocking markets. Mitigates breach risks ($1M+ liabilities), builds stakeholder trust, and signals maturity to VCs. Overlaps with ISO 27001 (80%), NIST, GDPR for efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: Gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), 3-12 month monitoring, CPA audit. Targets SaaS/cloud providers of all sizes; automation (Vanta, Drata) cuts effort 70%. Costs $20-100K; 3-12 months total.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach follows the Annex SL high-level structure with ten clauses, applicable to all organizations.

Key Components

Ten clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
PDCA cycle; no mandatory requirements or certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks; enhances efficiency and decision-making.
Integrates with ISO 9001, 14001; supports market access, ESG, future ISO 37301 transition.
Builds stakeholder trust, culture of integrity.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continuous improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors; no certification, self-benchmarking.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	ISO 19600
Scope	Security, availability, confidentiality, integrity, privacy via TSC	All compliance obligations, risk-based CMS guidelines
Industry	Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, tech), primarily US	All sectors, sizes, global applicability
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit standard, Type 1/2 reports	Non-certifiable ISO guidelines (withdrawn, succeeded by 37301)
Testing	CPA audits Type 2 over 3-12 months, operating effectiveness	Internal audits, management reviews, no formal certification
Penalties	No legal penalties, market exclusion, lost deals	No direct penalties, exposure to regulatory fines

Scope

SOC 2

Security, availability, confidentiality, integrity, privacy via TSC

ISO 19600

All compliance obligations, risk-based CMS guidelines

Industry

SOC 2

Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, tech), primarily US

ISO 19600

All sectors, sizes, global applicability

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit standard, Type 1/2 reports

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable ISO guidelines (withdrawn, succeeded by 37301)

Testing

SOC 2

CPA audits Type 2 over 3-12 months, operating effectiveness

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, no formal certification

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal penalties, market exclusion, lost deals

ISO 19600

No direct penalties, exposure to regulatory fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 19600

SOC 2 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs CCPA

Compare PIPL vs CCPA: China's GDPR-like law vs California's consumer rights powerhouse. Unpack extraterritorial scope, fines to 5% revenue, rights & compliance strategies for global firms. Dive in now!

CMMC vs IFS Food

CMMC vs IFS Food: Compare DoD cybersecurity maturity levels with food safety audits. Discover scoping, implementation strategies & pitfalls for seamless compliance. Secure your edge now!

Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III

Compare Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III: Key principles, APPs/NDB vs capital/liquidity rules, compliance strategies & enforcement risks. Master both for exec resilience!

SOC 2

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs CCPA

CMMC vs IFS Food

Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III