What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent attestation that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering assurance to stakeholders via CPA audits.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data, 70-80% of enterprise SaaS deals require Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, including evidence sampling, penetration testing, and management assertions.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 assessments should be performed annually for Type 2 reports to capture full control cycles, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** Covering a minimum 3-12 month monitoring period, recertification ensures ongoing effectiveness of TSC controls like access reviews and vulnerability scans.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles by 3-6 months, and heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** Absent Type 2 reports, vendors face exhaustive questionnaires, custom contracts, reputational damage, and lost revenue in enterprise markets.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map significantly to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A and NIST functions, enabling multi-framework efficiency without dual certifications.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria, engaging a CPA for readiness assessment.** Define in-scope systems, select TSC (Security mandatory), inventory assets, and map 50-100 controls, prioritizing quick wins like policies and IAM.

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to establish sound technology risk governance and oversight while maintaining cyber resilience through defence-in-depth and continuous improvement of IT processes to preserve confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of data and systems.** The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Technology Risk Management Guidelines (revised January 2021) target financial institutions to promote robust practices amid digital transformation and sophisticated cyber threats (Preface 1.4).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions (FIs) supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech sandbox participants.** Implementation must be proportionate to the FI's risk profile, service complexity, and technology dependencies (Section 2.2); the board and senior management bear ultimate accountability (Section 3.1).

Oes **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires an independent internal audit function to assess TRM controls, governance, and risk management effectiveness (Sections 3.1.7, 15).** FIs must ensure independent assurance, with external assessments recommended for penetration testing and specialized reviews (Section 13).

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**MAS TRM requires regular, risk-commensurate assessments, including annual penetration testing for Internet-accessible systems and periodic reviews of policies, risk frameworks, DR plans, and asset inventories (Sections 13.2.4, 3.2.1, 4.1.5, 8.2.2).** Vulnerability assessments occur based on system criticality (Section 13.1.1); cyber exercises and DR tests are scheduled per business needs (Sections 13.3, 8.3).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM exposes FIs to supervisory actions including fines, license conditions, revocations, and executive prohibitions, as MAS considers observance in supervision (Section 2.2).** Enforcement examples include S$27.45 million in AML/CFT fines across nine FIs and CMS license revocation for governance failures.

An **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MAS TRM can be mapped to frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0 for risk management cycles and ISO 27001 for ISMS controls (Section 3.2.1).** It aligns with NIST's Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover-Govern via TRM's governance, asset management, and cyber operations (Sections 3-13).

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is board approval of a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establishment of a TRM framework with clear roles, including CIO/CISO appointments (Sections 3.1.3, 3.1.7, 4.1).** Develop an information asset inventory for proportional control design (Section 3.3).

SOC 2 vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria compliance

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 offers voluntary trust assurance for global service providers via TSC audits, while MAS TRM mandates supervisory tech risk controls for Singapore FIs. Companies adopt SOC 2 for market access; MAS TRM to avoid fines and ensure resilience.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security (CC1-CC9)
Type 2 reports validate operating effectiveness over time
Flexible scoping of optional criteria for services
CPA-attested independent assurance builds customer trust
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA controls

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board and senior management accountability
Proportional risk-based implementation
Comprehensive cyber resilience controls
Third-party risk management requirements
Annual penetration testing for internet systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary AICPA audit framework for service organizations handling customer data. It assesses controls via **Trust Services Criteria (TSC)mandatory Security (CC1-CC9) plus optional Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Employs a risk-based approach evaluating design and operation.

Key Components

Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) cover control environment, risk assessment, access, monitoring, changes, vendors.
50-100 controls with redundancy (2-3 per point).
Built on COSO; Type 1 (point-in-time design), Type 2 (effectiveness over 3-12 months).
Independent CPA attestation reports.

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates sales, cuts due diligence by 80-90%.
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience.
Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; unlocks enterprises.
Builds trust, competitive moat, ROI in 3-6 months.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, gap analysis, deployment, monitoring, audit.
Targets service orgs (startups-enterprises), tech/fintech.
Automation (Vanta) essential; annual Type 2 recertification.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance from the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based, risk-proportional framework focused on governance, cybersecurity, resilience, and third-party risk to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data.

Key Components

15 sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset management, secure SDLC, and layered cyber defence.
No fixed controls; emphasises defence-in-depth and continuous improvement with independent assurance.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines, enforcement, and reputational damage.
Enhances operational resilience, reduces cyber risks, and builds customer trust.
Enables secure digital transformation and third-party ecosystem management.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based rollout: asset inventories, control mapping, testing regimes.
Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; proportional to size/complexity.
No certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, and board reporting. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	MAS TRM
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, etc.	Technology risk governance, cyber resilience, third-party oversight
Industry	Service organizations (SaaS, cloud) globally, all sizes	Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintech)
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit framework, market-driven	Supervisory guidelines, enforceable via MAS supervision
Testing	Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms	Annual pen tests for internet systems, DR tests, cyber exercises
Penalties	No legal fines, lost business/deals	Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, etc.

MAS TRM

Technology risk governance, cyber resilience, third-party oversight

Industry

SOC 2

Service organizations (SaaS, cloud) globally, all sizes

MAS TRM

Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintech)

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework, market-driven

MAS TRM

Supervisory guidelines, enforceable via MAS supervision

Testing

SOC 2

Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms

MAS TRM

Annual pen tests for internet systems, DR tests, cyber exercises

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal fines, lost business/deals

MAS TRM

Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and MAS TRM

SOC 2 FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs Australian Privacy Act

Discover PIPL vs Australian Privacy Act: Key diffs in consent, cross-border rules, penalties (up to 5% revenue). Master compliance for global ops. Unlock strategies now!

EPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Unlock EPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Compare environmental standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) with SEC's incident reporting & governance mandates. Strategies, risks & compliance guide. Read now! (157 chars)

SAFe vs EMAS

SAFe vs EMAS: Compare Scaled Agile Framework's enterprise agility with EU's Eco-Management Scheme for sustainability. Uncover ROI, configs, compliance—choose the right framework now!

SOC 2

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Oes MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

An MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs Australian Privacy Act

EPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

SAFe vs EMAS