Standards Comparison

    SOX

    Mandatory
    2002

    U.S. federal act mandating financial reporting controls

    VS

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance.

    Quick Verdict

    SOX mandates financial reporting integrity and ICFR for US public firms via audits and certifications, while MAS TRM provides technology risk guidelines for Singapore FIs emphasizing cyber resilience and proportional controls. Companies adopt SOX for legal compliance; MAS TRM for supervisory alignment.

    Financial Reporting

    SOX

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial accuracy
    • Requires ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation
    • Establishes PCAOB for audit oversight and standards
    • Enforces auditor independence and partner rotation
    • Imposes criminal penalties for false certifications
    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management accountability
    • Proportional risk-based implementation
    • Third-party risk management integration
    • Defence-in-depth cyber resilience
    • Annual penetration testing for internet systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOX Details

    What It Is

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute enacted post-Enron scandals. It mandates corporate accountability, accurate financial disclosures, and robust internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for public companies. Employs a risk-based approach via top-down scoping aligned with COSO framework.

    Key Components

    • **Title IPCAOB creation for audit oversight, inspections, standards.
    • **Title IIAuditor independence, non-audit service bans, partner rotation.
    • **Sections 302/906CEO/CFO certifications with civil/criminal penalties.
    • **Section 404ICFR assessment (404a), auditor attestation (404b).
    • Governance (audit committees), whistleblower protections, document retention. Compliance through annual reporting, no formal certification but SEC/PCAOB enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for U.S. public issuers; enhances investor trust, reduces restatements/fraud. Strategic benefits: governance maturity, operational efficiency, M&A readiness, lower capital costs despite high compliance expenses.

    Implementation Overview

    Top-down risk assessment, control design/documentation, testing (design/operating effectiveness), remediation, continuous monitoring. Applies to public companies/auditors; scaled for filer types (e.g., EGC exemptions). Annual ICFR reports in 10-K, auditor involvement for larger filers.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide principles-based guidance on managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing governance, controls, and resilience across the IT lifecycle. The approach is risk-based and proportional, tailored to an FI's complexity, services, and technologies.

    Key Components

    • 15 sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
    • Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventory, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
    • No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes for CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability).
    • Compliance via supervisory review, not formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines/enforcement.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust.
    • Supports digital transformation while mitigating ecosystem risks.
    • Builds board oversight and measurable risk metrics.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance setup, asset inventory, control design, testing, monitoring.
    • Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; proportional by size/risk.
    • Involves policies, training, audits; 12-24 months typical for maturity.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SOX
    Financial reporting, ICFR, governance, certifications
    MAS TRM
    Technology/cyber risks, IT operations, resilience, third-parties

    Industry

    SOX
    US public companies, global issuers
    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintechs)

    Nature

    SOX
    Mandatory federal statute, SEC/PCAOB enforced
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines, proportional implementation

    Testing

    SOX
    Annual ICFR audits, control testing, PCAOB standards
    MAS TRM
    VA/PT annual for internet systems, DR tests, cyber exercises

    Penalties

    SOX
    Criminal fines/imprisonment, civil liabilities, restatements
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory fines, license conditions, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOX and MAS TRM

    SOX FAQ

    MAS TRM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages