SOX
U.S. regulation mandating financial reporting controls and accountability
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
SOX mandates financial reporting controls for US public firms, ensuring ICFR integrity via audits and certifications. SAMA CSF requires cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financials, focusing on governance and threat response. Firms adopt SOX for listing compliance, SAMA CSF for regulatory resilience.
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial accuracy and controls
- Requires management annual assessment of ICFR effectiveness
- Demands external auditor attestation on internal controls
- Establishes PCAOB for public audit firm oversight
- Imposes criminal penalties for false certifications
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
- Four core domains with detailed subdomains
- Board-level governance and CISO requirements
- Principle-based risk management approach
- Third-party cybersecurity due diligence mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute for public company accountability. It mandates accurate financial disclosures via risk-based internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR), responding to scandals like Enron.
Key Components
- **11 TitlesPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (II), certifications (302/906), ICFR assessments (404), real-time disclosures (409), penalties (802/906).
- Leverages COSO framework for control design.
- Annual management reports with auditor attestation for most filers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for U.S. public companies, protecting investors.
- Reduces fraud, enhances governance, lowers capital costs.
- Builds trust, aids IPO/M&A readiness, improves efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- **Top-down risk-based approachscoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
- Cross-functional (finance/IT/legal); scaled by filer size.
- Requires annual external audits under PCAOB standards.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity, focusing on governance, risk management, operations, and third-party controls to detect, resist, respond, and recover from threats.
Key Components
- Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
- Six-level maturity model (minimum Level 3: structured and formalized).
- Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; enforced via self-assessments and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance for banks, insurers, financing firms to avoid penalties, audits, operational restrictions.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risks, improves efficiency.
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, competitive edge in digital finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: initiation, gap analysis, risk assessment, deployment, monitoring, audits.
- Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
- Requires board governance, CISO, evidence portfolios for self-assessments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOX | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Financial reporting, ICFR, governance, certifications | Cybersecurity leadership, risk mgmt, operations, third-party |
| Industry | US public companies, global reach | Saudi financial institutions only |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal statute, SEC/PCAOB enforced | Mandatory regulatory framework, SAMA supervised |
| Testing | Annual ICFR assessments, auditor attestations | Periodic self-assessments, maturity model audits |
| Penalties | Criminal fines, imprisonment for executives | Regulatory actions, fines, operational restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOX and SAMA CSF
SOX FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMI vs ISO 41001
Explore CMMI vs ISO 41001: IT process maturity vs FM systems. Boost ops efficiency, compliance & sustainability. Uncover differences to optimize your strategy today!
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs CIS Controls
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs CIS Controls: Compare AI governance framework with cybersecurity hygiene. Uncover synergies, gaps, and strategies for secure, compliant AI systems now.
UL Certification vs C-TPAT
Compare UL Certification vs C-TPAT: Key differences in product safety marks, standards & supply chain security. Boost compliance, cut risks & unlock market access. Dive in now!