SOX
U.S. law enhancing corporate financial reporting and accountability
SQF
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management
Quick Verdict
SOX mandates financial reporting controls for US public companies via CEO/CFO certifications and audits, while SQF is a voluntary food safety certification using HACCP for global supply chains. Public firms adopt SOX for legal compliance; food producers choose SQF for market access.
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial reports (Section 302)
- Requires ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
- Creates PCAOB for audit firm oversight and standards
- Enforces auditor independence via non-audit service bans
- Imposes criminal penalties for document tampering and fraud
SQF
Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9
Key Features
- Modular: Module 2 plus sector-specific GMP modules
- HACCP-based Food Safety Plan mandatory
- Full-time onsite SQF Practitioner required
- GFSI-benchmarked global certification
- Annual audits with unannounced options
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute mandating enhanced corporate accountability and financial disclosure reliability for public companies. Enacted post-Enron scandals, it focuses on investor protection via risk-based internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR), executive certifications, and audit oversight.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive/board accountability (Titles III-IV).
- Core sections: 302 (certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- Built on COSO framework; no fixed controls, emphasizes key controls like ITGCs.
- Compliance model: annual management reports, auditor opinions for most filers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for U.S. public issuers; reduces restatements, fraud risk.
- Builds investor trust, lowers capital costs, aids M&A/IPO readiness.
- Enhances governance, operational efficiency via automation.
Implementation Overview
- Top-down risk-based approach: scoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
- Applies to public companies; scaled for smaller filers.
- Year-round program with external audits; phased over 12-18 months initially.
SQF Details
What It Is
Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system ensuring food safety (and quality) across supply chains from farm to fork. Administered by SQFI, it uses a risk-based, auditable framework grounded in Codex HACCP principles.
Key Components
- **Modular structureMandatory Module 2 (system elements like management commitment, HACCP plan, verification) paired with sector GMPs (e.g., Module 11 for manufacturing).
- Covers PRPs, traceability, food defense, allergens, training; graded audits (E/G/C/F scores).
- Built on "say what you do, do what you say, prove it" philosophy.
Why Organizations Use It
- De-facto license to trade for retailers; reduces duplicative audits.
- Mitigates recall risks, strengthens due diligence, aligns with FSMA/EU regs.
- Builds food safety culture, enhances supplier trust, operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, designate SQF Practitioner, document/implement, internal audits, third-party certification.
- Suits all sizes/industries (manufacturing, storage); annual audits, unannounced options.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOX | SQF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Financial reporting, internal controls, governance | Food safety, HACCP, quality management, PRPs |
| Industry | Public companies, all sectors, US-focused | Food manufacturing, supply chain, global |
| Nature | Mandatory federal law, SEC/PCAOB enforced | Voluntary GFSI certification, third-party audit |
| Testing | Annual ICFR audits, management certification | Annual site audits, internal verification |
| Penalties | Criminal fines, imprisonment, SEC enforcement | Certification loss, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOX and SQF
SOX FAQ
SQF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIS2 vs ISO 22000
Compare NIS2 vs ISO 22000: EU cybersecurity expands sectors, mandates 24h incident reports & 2% fines vs food safety FSMS with HACCP, PRPs & PDCA. Master compliance now!
REACH vs C-TPAT
Compare REACH vs C-TPAT: Master EU chemical regs & US supply chain security. Expert strategies, pitfalls & implementation for importers to ensure compliance & efficiency. (157)
FISMA vs ISO 27018
Compare FISMA vs ISO 27018: US federal risk-based cybersecurity law (NIST RMF) meets global cloud PII privacy code. Master compliance differences, controls & strategies for secure federal data. Dive in now!