What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety and quality management system that assures consistent production of safe food products across the supply chain.** Administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), it integrates **Module 2** (universal system elements like management commitment, HACCP plans, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, and training) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs). This GFSI-benchmarked framework ensures organizations "say what you do," "do what you say," and "prove it" through documented, implemented, and verified controls, enabling global market access as a recognized "license to trade."

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is not legally mandated but is a professional requirement for food sector organizations seeking GFSI recognition and retailer/brand owner approval.** It applies to primary producers, manufacturers, storage/distribution, packaging, pet food, and supplements via Food Sector Categories (FSCs). Sites must designate a full-time, on-site **SQF Practitioner** (HACCP-trained, competent in the Code) and implement **Module 2** plus relevant GMP modules. Major retailers and foodservice providers worldwide require SQF (or equivalent) for supplier qualification, affecting over 14,000 certified sites in 40+ countries.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF mandates external audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies (CBs) accredited to ISO/IEC 17065 for certification.** Initial certification, annual surveillance, recertification, and periodic unannounced audits (e.g., every 3 years) use graded nonconformities (minor=1pt, major=5pts, critical=50pts) with score bands (E:96-100, G:86-95, C:70-85, F:<70). CBs issue 12-month certificates listed in the SQFI directory, with auditor safeguards like 3-cycle rotation limits and biennial witnessed audits ensuring integrity.

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits performed regularly to maintain the system.** **Management review** occurs at least annually (with monthly SQF Practitioner updates), while verification/monitoring (2.5.2), corrective actions (2.5.3), and internal audits (2.5.5) are ongoing. Crisis/recall plans must be tested annually, and sites conduct gap assessments 60-90 days pre-audit plus mock audits. Surveillance ensures continuous compliance post-certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors/minors require CAPA closure (often within 30 days). Failed audits incur re-audit fees, lost retailer contracts, recall risks, and reputational damage. Persistent issues lead to delisting from the SQFI directory, blocking market access.

An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps effectively to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks due to its HACCP foundation and management system structure.** **Module 2** aligns with shared elements like leadership, document control, verification, internal audits, and CAPA across schemes. SQF Quality Code layers atop existing GFSI programs, HACCP, or ISO 22000, reducing duplication while maintaining sector-specific GMPs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is site registration in the SQFI assessment database and designation of a competent SQF Practitioner.** Select applicable modules (e.g., **Module 2** + **Module 11**), conduct a gap analysis against Edition 9 (effective May 2021), develop the food safety policy, and build the HACCP-based system. Secure executive commitment for resources and cross-functional team assembly.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Innovation Management System (IMS).** The standard structures the IMS around the PDCA cycle across Clauses 4–10: context of the organization, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. It emphasizes eight principles including value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, and managing uncertainty, enabling organizations to systematically convert opportunities into measurable value without prescribing specific tools or methods.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is a voluntary guidance standard.** It applies generically to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or type—including SMEs, established firms, and public entities—seeking to build innovation capability. Professionals such as C-suite executives, Chief Innovation Officers, R&D heads, and quality managers use it to align innovation with strategy, while policymakers and consultants apply it for capability development programs.

Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable guidance standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) for self-assessment. Optional conformity assessments via ISO 56004 or third-party schemes provide maturity validation, distinct from certifiable standards like ISO 56001.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 requires periodic internal audits and management reviews as part of performance evaluation (Clause 9), typically annually or aligned with organizational cadence.** Assessments use Clause 9 mechanisms—monitoring KPIs, internal audits, and reviews—to feed continual improvement (Clause 10). Maturity diagnostics like the Potential Innovation Index support initial and periodic gap analyses, with frequency tailored to context (e.g., quarterly for high-velocity sectors).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Business risks include resource waste on "zombie projects," poor portfolio outcomes, strategic obsolescence, IP leakage, and lost stakeholder confidence. Without IMS governance, organizations face higher project failure rates (up to 80%) and missed value realization.

An **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 maps directly to other international frameworks via its High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA alignment.** Clauses 4–10 enable integration with management systems sharing Annex SL, facilitating shared audits, leadership reviews, and documented information. It complements the ISO 56000 family (e.g., ISO 56000 vocabulary, ISO 56004 assessment).

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step is a readiness diagnostic and gap analysis against Clauses 4–10, such as using maturity tools like the Potential Innovation Index.** This establishes baseline maturity, identifies priority interventions (e.g., leadership commitment per Clause 5), and defines IMS scope, followed by executive alignment workshops.

SQF vs ISO 56002

Q: How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits performed regularly to maintain the system.** **Management review** occurs at least annually (with monthly SQF Practitioner updates), while verification/monitoring (2.5.2), corrective actions (2.5.3), and internal audits (2.5.5) are ongoing. Crisis/recall plans must be tested annually, and sites conduct gap assessments 60-90 days pre-audit plus mock audits. Surveillance ensures continuous compliance post-certification.

Q: What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors/minors require CAPA closure (often within 30 days). Failed audits incur re-audit fees, lost retailer contracts, recall risks, and reputational damage. Persistent issues lead to delisting from the SQFI directory, blocking market access.

Q: An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps effectively to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks due to its HACCP foundation and management system structure.** **Module 2** aligns with shared elements like leadership, document control, verification, internal audits, and CAPA across schemes. SQF Quality Code layers atop existing GFSI programs, HACCP, or ISO 22000, reducing duplication while maintaining sector-specific GMPs.

Q: What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is site registration in the SQFI assessment database and designation of a competent SQF Practitioner.** Select applicable modules (e.g., **Module 2** + **Module 11**), conduct a gap analysis against Edition 9 (effective May 2021), develop the food safety policy, and build the HACCP-based system. Secure executive commitment for resources and cross-functional team assembly.

Q: What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Innovation Management System (IMS).** The standard structures the IMS around the PDCA cycle across Clauses 4–10: context of the organization, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. It emphasizes eight principles including value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, and managing uncertainty, enabling organizations to systematically convert opportunities into measurable value without prescribing specific tools or methods.

Q: Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is a voluntary guidance standard.** It applies generically to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or type—including SMEs, established firms, and public entities—seeking to build innovation capability. Professionals such as C-suite executives, Chief Innovation Officers, R&D heads, and quality managers use it to align innovation with strategy, while policymakers and consultants apply it for capability development programs.

Q: Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable guidance standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) for self-assessment. Optional conformity assessments via ISO 56004 or third-party schemes provide maturity validation, distinct from certifiable standards like ISO 56001.

Standards Comparison

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance for innovation management systems.

Quick Verdict

SQF ensures food safety certification for supply chains, while ISO 56002 guides innovation systems for value creation. Food companies adopt SQF for GFSI compliance and market access; all organizations use ISO 56002 to systematize innovation governance.

Agile Scaling

SQF

SQF Food Safety Code Edition 9

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular architecture: Module 2 plus sector GMPs
HACCP-based food safety plans with validation
GFSI-benchmarked global certification program
Mandatory full-time on-site SQF Practitioner
Traceability, recall, and crisis management requirements

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA-based innovation management system framework
Leadership commitment and portfolio governance emphasis
Tailored processes for uncertainty and risk management
Balanced KPI framework for performance evaluation
Continual improvement via audits and reviews

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SQF Details

What It Is

SQF Food Safety Code Edition 9 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program administered by SQFI. It provides a rigorous, HACCP-based framework for food safety management across supply chains, from farm to fork, using modular structure with universal Module 2 system elements and sector-specific Good Practices.

Key Components

**Module 2Management commitment, HACCP plans, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, training.
Sector modules (e.g., Module 11 GMPs for manufacturing).
Built on Codex HACCP principles; over 20 mandatory elements.
Annual third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades).

Why Organizations Use It

Drives market access for retailers; reduces recalls and audits; aligns with FSMA/EU regs; builds food safety culture via leadership accountability. Enhances resilience, supplier trust, and operational efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Applies to manufacturers, storage, all sizes; 6-12 months typical; requires SQF Practitioner and CB accreditation.

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019, titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance, is an international framework providing non-prescriptive guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). Its primary purpose is to help organizations systematically manage innovation to realize value, structured around the PDCA cycle and aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure.

Key Components

Seven core clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, insights exploitation, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking.
No fixed controls; emphasizes tailored portfolio governance and continual improvement.
Guidance only; pairs with ISO 56001 for certifiable requirements.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives strategic innovation, reduces project failures, improves ROI.
Enhances resilience, stakeholder trust, market responsiveness.
Manages risks like IP leakage, resource waste; voluntary but boosts competitiveness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: diagnosis, design, pilot, scale, sustain (12-36 months).
Involves maturity assessments (e.g., PII), policy development, tooling, audits.
Applicable to all sizes/sectors; SMEs use staged, lightweight approaches.

Key Differences

Aspect	SQF	ISO 56002
Scope	Food safety management and GMPs across supply chain	Innovation management system for value creation
Industry	Food manufacturing, storage, distribution globally	All sectors and organization types worldwide
Nature	GFSI-benchmarked certification standard	Voluntary guidance framework, non-certifiable
Testing	Annual third-party audits, unannounced checks	Internal audits, management reviews optional
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	No formal penalties, internal improvement only

Scope

SQF

Food safety management and GMPs across supply chain

ISO 56002

Innovation management system for value creation

Industry

SQF

Food manufacturing, storage, distribution globally

ISO 56002

All sectors and organization types worldwide

Nature

SQF

GFSI-benchmarked certification standard

ISO 56002

Voluntary guidance framework, non-certifiable

Testing

SQF

Annual third-party audits, unannounced checks

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews optional

Penalties

SQF

Loss of certification, market access denial

ISO 56002

No formal penalties, internal improvement only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SQF and ISO 56002

SQF FAQ

ISO 56002 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs ENERGY STAR

Discover Six Sigma vs ENERGY STAR: DMAIC defect reduction meets energy efficiency benchmarks. Unlock quality gains, cost savings & sustainability. Compare now!

NIST 800-171 vs ISO 26000

Compare NIST 800-171 vs ISO 26000: Cybersecurity for CUI meets social responsibility guidance. Uncover key differences, synergies, and strategies to align compliance with sustainability. Boost your edge—read now!

PCI DSS vs IATF 16949

Compare PCI DSS vs IATF 16949: payment security meets automotive quality standards. Explore key differences, compliance tips, and strategies to align both for peak efficiency. Discover now!

SQF

ISO 56002

Quick Verdict

SQF

Key Features

ISO 56002

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

An SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Does ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

An ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs ENERGY STAR

NIST 800-171 vs ISO 26000

PCI DSS vs IATF 16949