What is the primary objective of **TISAX**?

**TISAX's primary objective is to standardize information security assessments and enable secure exchange of results across the automotive supply chain via the ENX Portal.** Developed by the ENX Association using the VDA ISA catalog (version 5.0.4 or later), it verifies protection of sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information against cyber threats, ensuring CIA triad compliance at maturity levels Basic, Significant, or Very High based on data sensitivity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **TISAX**?

**TISAX compliance is a contractual requirement, not legal, for automotive OEMs, Tier 1/Tier 2 suppliers, service providers, and logistics firms handling sensitive data.** Mandated by OEMs like Volkswagen or BMW in RFPs and agreements, it applies to any entity processing OEM IP (e.g., ADAS software, prototypes) or accessing ENX portals; over 2,000 participants use it for supply chain trust.

Does **TISAX** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, TISAX requires external audits by ENX-accredited providers (e.g., DQS, TÜV) for Significant and Very High levels, issuing labels valid for 3 years.** AL1 is self-assessment only (no label); AL2 involves remote plausibility checks; AL3 mandates on-site audits with interviews, facility inspections, and evidence review per VDA ISA's 70+ controls.

How often should an assessment for **TISAX** be performed?

**TISAX assessments must be performed every 3 years to renew labels, with no interim surveillance audits required.** Reassessments follow the full process (self-assessment, gap analysis, external audit); organizations conduct internal audits, tabletop exercises, and management reviews quarterly/annually to maintain maturity level 3+ across VDA ISA controls.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **TISAX**?

**Non-compliance with TISAX results in contractual termination, lost OEM portal access, and revenue forfeiture (e.g., €10-50M annually for mid-tier suppliers).** OEMs impose penalties up to 5% of contract value, plus €20,000-€100,000 re-audit costs; reputational damage and production halts cascade through just-in-time chains.

Can **TISAX** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, TISAX maps directly to ISO 27001/27002 via its VDA ISA catalog, enabling 70-90% control overlap and integrated audits.** It extends ISO with automotive-specific modules (e.g., prototype protection), allowing reuse of ISMS policies, risk assessments, and evidence for dual certification, reducing duplicate efforts.

What is the first step to begin implementing **TISAX**?

**The first step is registering on the ENX Portal (tisax.org) and defining the Assessment Scope and Leadership Profile (ASLP).** Collaborate with OEMs to classify protection needs (Normal/High/Very High), download VDA ISA Excel for gap analysis across 7 control groups, and assemble a cross-functional team.

What is the primary objective of **C-TPAT**?

**The primary objective of C-TPAT is to secure U.S. and international supply chains against terrorist intrusion through voluntary public-private partnerships.** Established in November 2001 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the program partners with over 11,400 entities—including importers, carriers, brokers, and foreign manufacturers—representing more than 52% of U.S. imports by value. Participants implement **Minimum Security Criteria (MSC)** across 12 domains, such as risk assessment, cybersecurity, physical access, and business partner vetting, enabling CBP to focus resources on higher-risk shipments while providing certified partners with trade facilitation benefits like reduced examinations and FAST lane access.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **C-TPAT**?

**C-TPAT compliance is voluntary, not legally required, but CBP evaluates eligibility case-by-case for trade community partners demonstrating supply chain security excellence.** Eligible entities include U.S. importers/exporters, highway/rail/sea/air carriers, customs brokers, 3PLs, consolidators/NVOCCs, marine port/terminal operators, and foreign manufacturers. Applicants must maintain a U.S. business presence (for exporters), provide EIN/DUNS, designate contacts, and show no significant security incidents. Over 11,400 partners participate, but non-members face higher targeting risks without benefits like reduced exams.

Does **C-TPAT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**C-TPAT does not require external audits or third-party certification; it relies on self-assessment, CBP validation, and internal validation processes.** CBP conducts risk-based validations—pre-announced with ~30 days' notice, limited to 10 working days, and collaborative rather than adversarial. These verify Security Profile implementation against role-specific **MSC** via document review, interviews, and site visits (domestic/foreign). Partners must maintain documented internal validations; significant weaknesses trigger corrective actions or benefit suspension, but no formal certification body is involved.

How often should an assessment for **C-TPAT** be performed?

**C-TPAT requires supply chain risk assessments at least annually, or more frequently based on changes in threats, operations, or incidents.** CBP's importer **MSC 2.3** mandates documented reviews of the overall risk assessment (self-assessment plus international mapping), with updates for mergers, new partners, or heightened risks. Security Profiles must be refreshed annually in the C-TPAT Portal, incorporating new evidence. Internal validations support this cadence; CBP revalidations occur periodically (typically every 4 years, risk-based).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **C-TPAT**?

**Non-compliance with C-TPAT results in suspension or removal of trade benefits, not direct fines, as it is voluntary.** CBP issues validation reports identifying weaknesses; significant issues require corrective action plans, with benefits suspended until verified remediation. Outcomes include heightened targeting, more examinations, loss of FAST access, and priority processing. Persistent failures lead to program removal; reinstatement demands evidence of fixes. Over 11,400 partners maintain status through self-governance amid limited SCSS capacity (114 specialists).

Can **C-TPAT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, C-TPAT maps to international AEO programs via 19 Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) as of June 2025.** CBP recognizes security validations from partners like EU, Canada, Mexico, Japan, UK, India, Brazil, and South Africa, reducing duplicative oversight. MRAs focus solely on security (not customs compliance like 10+2), enabling reciprocal low-risk status. Partners verify foreign AEO via the Portal; this enhances global trade facilitation while aligning **MSC** domains like risk assessment and cyber controls.

What is the first step to begin implementing **C-TPAT**?

**The first step to implement C-TPAT is submitting a Company Profile and Security Profile via the secure C-TPAT Portal.** Create an account, provide corporate details/contacts, complete the role-specific Security Profile detailing **MSC** adherence with Evidence of Implementation (policies, logs, photos), and sign the MOU. CBP reviews within 90 days per SAFE Port Act. Precede with a gap analysis against tailored **MSC** and Five-Step Risk Assessment to ensure readiness.

TISAX vs C-TPAT

Standards Comparison

TISAX

Mandatory

2017

Automotive standard for trusted information security assessments

C-TPAT

Voluntary

2001

Voluntary U.S. program securing supply chains against terrorism

Quick Verdict

TISAX ensures information security for automotive suppliers via tiered audits, while C-TPAT secures U.S. trade supply chains through CBP validations. OEMs mandate TISAX for IP protection; importers join C-TPAT for reduced inspections and faster clearance.

Cybersecurity

TISAX

Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Shareable security assessments via ENX portal
Automotive-specific prototype protection controls
Tiered levels: AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 on-site
Maturity model (0-5 scale) for VDA ISA controls
Reduces duplicate audits with 3-year reusable labels

Supply Chain Security

C-TPAT

Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based supply chain security assessments
Tailored Minimum Security Criteria by partner type
CBP validation with tiered trade benefits
Business partner vetting and due diligence
Cybersecurity and forced labor requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

TISAX Details

What It Is

TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry framework for standardizing information security assessments in the automotive supply chain. Developed by the ENX Association using the VDA ISA catalog (v5.0.4+), it verifies protection of sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information. It employs a risk-based approach with three assessment levels: AL1 (self), AL2 (remote), AL3 (on-site).

Key Components

70+ controls across 7 groups: Policy, Organization, Personnel, Physical Security, Access Control, Cryptography, Operations.
Prototype protection modules for parts, vehicles, events.
Maturity model (0-5 scale) built on ISO 27001 ISMS.
ENX portal for exchanging 3-year valid labels; certification by accredited providers.

Why Organizations Use It

Contractual mandates from OEMs (e.g., BMW, VW) prevent revenue loss.
Mitigates cyber risks, ensures supply chain resilience.
Cuts duplicate audits (70-90% efficiency), boosts market access.
Builds trust, enables innovation in ADAS/EV projects.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, control remediation with table-tops, audits, sustainment. 6-18 months; scalable for SMEs/multinationals in automotive ecosystem. Requires cross-functional teams, internal audits.

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

C-TPAT (Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) is a voluntary U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) public-private partnership framework. It focuses on securing international supply chains from terrorism, smuggling, and other threats through risk-based security practices. The approach emphasizes self-assessment, partner vetting, and CBP validation.

Key Components

12 core Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) domains: risk assessment, business partners, cybersecurity, physical access, personnel security, conveyance security, procedural security, agricultural security, and more.
Tailored MSCs by partner type (importers, carriers, brokers, etc.).
Security Profile documenting implementation.
Validation/revalidation by CBP Supply Chain Security Specialists; tiered status (Tier 1-3).

Why Organizations Use It

Trade facilitation: reduced inspections, FAST lanes, priority processing.
Risk mitigation against terrorism, forced labor, cyber threats.
Competitive edge via trusted trader status and MRAs.
Enhanced reputation and supply chain resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy development, training, partner vetting, evidence collection.
Applies to importers, carriers, manufacturers globally.
Involves portal application, internal audits, CBP validation (risk-based, ~10 days max).

Key Differences

Aspect	TISAX	C-TPAT
Scope	Information security, prototype protection in automotive	Physical supply chain security against terrorism, cyber threats
Industry	Automotive supply chain, global but Europe-focused	All U.S. import/export trade partners, global supply chains
Nature	Voluntary industry certification via ENX audits	Voluntary CBP partnership with validations, tiered benefits
Testing	AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 onsite audits every 3 years	Risk-based SCSS validations, revalidations every 4 years
Penalties	Loss of label, contract exclusion, no direct fines	Benefit suspension, higher inspections, no direct fines

Scope

TISAX

Information security, prototype protection in automotive

C-TPAT

Physical supply chain security against terrorism, cyber threats

Industry

TISAX

Automotive supply chain, global but Europe-focused

C-TPAT

All U.S. import/export trade partners, global supply chains

Nature

TISAX

Voluntary industry certification via ENX audits

C-TPAT

Voluntary CBP partnership with validations, tiered benefits

Testing

TISAX

AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 onsite audits every 3 years

C-TPAT

Risk-based SCSS validations, revalidations every 4 years

Penalties

TISAX

Loss of label, contract exclusion, no direct fines

C-TPAT

Benefit suspension, higher inspections, no direct fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about TISAX and C-TPAT

TISAX FAQ

C-TPAT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs COBIT

Compare PIPEDA vs COBIT: Canada's privacy law meets IT governance framework. Unlock compliance strategies, safeguards & audits for data mastery. Align today!

PCI DSS vs OSHA

Discover PCI DSS vs OSHA: Compare payment card security standards with workplace safety rules. Key differences, compliance tips, and risk strategies for business leaders. Dive in now!

PCI DSS vs COPPA

Compare PCI DSS vs COPPA: PCI's 12 controls secure card data; COPPA demands parental consent for kids under 13 online. Key differences, compliance tips—master both now!

TISAX

C-TPAT

Quick Verdict

TISAX

Key Features

C-TPAT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

TISAX Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

TISAX FAQ

What is the primary objective of TISAX?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with TISAX?

Does TISAX require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for TISAX be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with TISAX?

Can TISAX be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing TISAX?

C-TPAT FAQ

What is the primary objective of C-TPAT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with C-TPAT?

Does C-TPAT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for C-TPAT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with C-TPAT?

Can C-TPAT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing C-TPAT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs COBIT

PCI DSS vs OSHA

PCI DSS vs COPPA