TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture development
23 NYCRR 500
New York regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides proven enterprise architecture methodology for global organizations aligning business and IT, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity controls for NY financial entities. Companies use TOGAF for strategic alignment; Part 500 for regulatory compliance and risk reduction.
TOGAF
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
- Content Framework with metamodel for standardized artifacts
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable architecture assets
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance structures
- Reference models like TRM, SIB, and III-RM
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual CISO/CEO dual-signature certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- Comprehensive third-party service provider oversight
- Risk-based annual penetration testing requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework developed by The Open Group. Its primary purpose is to provide proven methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change across business and IT. The core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring to organizational contexts.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, A-H, plus continuous Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, and metamodel with core entities like actors, services, data entities.
- Enterprise Continuum, Architecture Repository, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM).
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance, skills, maturity. No formal certification for organizations; practitioner certifications available.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives strategic alignment, reuse, risk reduction, ROI improvement. Enables consistent standards, avoids vendor lock-in, supports agility. Builds stakeholder trust through governed, traceable architectures; applicable to large enterprises across industries.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: Preliminary capability setup, ADM iteration via pilots, governance embedding. Suited for mid-to-large organizations; requires tailoring, repository, training. No mandatory audits; self-assessed maturity via ACMM.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate effective March 2017 with 2023 amendments. It establishes risk-based cybersecurity requirements for financial services entities to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems, emphasizing governance, controls, and evidence-based compliance.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO appointment, MFA, encryption, risk assessments, penetration testing, third-party oversight, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Built on risk-assessment-centric architecture with annual CISO/CEO certification and five-year record retention.
- Class A companies (high revenue/employees) face enhanced audits and controls; limited exemptions for small entities.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, vendor management, and executive accountability; aligns with NIST CSF.
- Builds stakeholder trust and reduces incident risks.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance, risk assessment, MFA rollout, asset inventory, testing.
- Applies to NY-regulated firms regardless of location; DFS provides templates.
- No external certification but annual filing and examinations require auditable evidence (~180 words).
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance | Cybersecurity program and controls for financial entities |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any organization size | NY financial services, licensed entities primarily |
| Nature | Voluntary EA methodology and framework | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Maturity assessments, compliance reviews optional | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification optional | Fines, consent orders, license actions possible |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and 23 NYCRR 500
TOGAF FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EMAS vs ISO 30301
EMAS vs ISO 30301: Compare EU's premium EMS for env performance/transparency with records MSR. Key diffs, benefits & choice guide for compliance. Dive in now!
TISAX vs PIPEDA
Compare TISAX vs PIPEDA: Automotive security vs Canadian privacy law. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for supply chains. Master both now!
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs TISAX
Compare CSL vs TISAX: China's Cybersecurity Law data rules meet automotive security std. Gain compliance strategies, risks & advantages for global ops. Strategize now!