Standards Comparison

    TOGAF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for global organizations to align business and IT, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities with strict testing, assurance, and APRA notifications to ensure cyber resilience.

    Enterprise Architecture

    TOGAF

    TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
    • Content Framework with Metamodel for consistency
    • Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable assets
    • Architecture Capability Framework for governance
    • Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • Covers third-party managed information assets
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    TOGAF Details

    What It Is

    TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for organizational context.

    Key Components

    • **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision, Business/Data/Application/Technology Architectures, Opportunities, Migration, Governance, Change Management.
    • **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, metamodel.
    • Enterprise Continuum, reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM).
    • Architecture Capability Framework for governance, skills, maturity. No fixed controls; certification via Open Group paths.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, reuse, risk reduction. Enables vendor neutrality, ROI improvement, Boundaryless Information Flow. Builds trust via governance, compliance traceability. Strategic for transformations, avoiding lock-in.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: preparation, assessment, target design, pilot, scale via ADM iterations. Applies to large enterprises across industries; tailoring essential. Requires repository, board, training; no mandatory audits, voluntary certification.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated financial institutions to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, testing, and rapid incident notification to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties.

    Key Components

    • 11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit assurance, and APRA notifications (72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for control weaknesses).
    • Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to risks.
    • No formal certification; compliance via evidence-based assurance and supervisory review.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid penalties, enforcement, and reputational damage.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, stakeholder trust, and operational continuity.
    • Provides competitive edge through robust third-party oversight.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, governance setup, asset classification, controls, testing, and monitoring.
    • Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; audits via internal/external assurance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    TOGAF
    Enterprise architecture design, governance, ADM lifecycle
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security capability, controls, incident response

    Industry

    TOGAF
    All industries worldwide, any organization size
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super)

    Nature

    TOGAF
    Voluntary vendor-neutral framework, no enforcement
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation, APRA enforcement

    Testing

    TOGAF
    Tailored maturity assessments, compliance reviews
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent control testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    TOGAF
    None, loss of certification or best practices
    APRA CPS 234
    Fines, supervisory actions, license restrictions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about TOGAF and APRA CPS 234

    TOGAF FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages