TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for global organizations to align business and IT, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities with strict testing, assurance, and APRA notifications to ensure cyber resilience.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
- Content Framework with Metamodel for consistency
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable assets
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance
- Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Covers third-party managed information assets
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for organizational context.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision, Business/Data/Application/Technology Architectures, Opportunities, Migration, Governance, Change Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, metamodel.
- Enterprise Continuum, reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM).
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance, skills, maturity. No fixed controls; certification via Open Group paths.
Why Organizations Use It
Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, reuse, risk reduction. Enables vendor neutrality, ROI improvement, Boundaryless Information Flow. Builds trust via governance, compliance traceability. Strategic for transformations, avoiding lock-in.
Implementation Overview
Phased: preparation, assessment, target design, pilot, scale via ADM iterations. Applies to large enterprises across industries; tailoring essential. Requires repository, board, training; no mandatory audits, voluntary certification.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated financial institutions to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, testing, and rapid incident notification to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties.
Key Components
- 11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit assurance, and APRA notifications (72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for control weaknesses).
- Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to risks.
- No formal certification; compliance via evidence-based assurance and supervisory review.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid penalties, enforcement, and reputational damage.
- Enhances cyber resilience, stakeholder trust, and operational continuity.
- Provides competitive edge through robust third-party oversight.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, governance setup, asset classification, controls, testing, and monitoring.
- Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; audits via internal/external assurance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture design, governance, ADM lifecycle | Information security capability, controls, incident response |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any organization size | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary vendor-neutral framework, no enforcement | Mandatory prudential regulation, APRA enforcement |
| Testing | Tailored maturity assessments, compliance reviews | Systematic independent control testing, annual reviews |
| Penalties | None, loss of certification or best practices | Fines, supervisory actions, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and APRA CPS 234
TOGAF FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37301 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Discover ISO 37301 vs MLPS 2.0: Certifiable compliance systems meet China's graded cybersecurity protection. Key diffs, benefits & strategies for global ops. Align now!
ISO 37001 vs ISO 55001
ISO 37001 vs ISO 55001: Compare anti-bribery (ABMS) & asset management systems (AMS). Key differences, benefits, implementation & compliance tips. Optimize your strategy now!
CE Marking vs RoHS
Confused by CE Marking vs RoHS? Unlock key differences: CE declares broad EU conformity; RoHS restricts 10 hazardous substances in EEE. Ensure seamless market access—expert insights now!