TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture development and governance
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for aligning business and IT globally, while Basel III mandates binding capital, leverage, and liquidity rules for banks. Organizations adopt TOGAF for efficiency and governance; Basel III for regulatory compliance and resilience.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for enterprise architecture development
- Content Metamodel standardizing deliverables, artifacts, building blocks
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable architecture assets
- Reference models including TRM, SIB, and III-RM
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance and compliance
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- Higher CET1 capital minimums and conservation buffers
- Non-risk-based 3% leverage ratio backstop
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Enhanced Pillar 3 RWA comparability disclosures
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework and methodology. Its primary purpose is designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change across business and IT. Core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) spanning phases from preliminary preparation to change management.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, A-H (Vision to Change Management), plus continuous Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks.
- Enterprise Continuum, Architecture Repository, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM).
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance. No fixed controls; modular certification via Open Group paths.
Why Organizations Use It
Aligns strategy with execution, reduces duplication, accelerates delivery via reuse, improves risk management. Voluntary adoption drives efficiency, ROI, vendor neutrality. Builds stakeholder trust through governed, traceable architectures.
Implementation Overview
Phased tailoring: foundation, pilot, scale. Involves maturity assessment, ADM iteration, repository setup. Suits large enterprises across industries; requires training, tools like ArchiMate repositories. No mandatory audits; self-governed via Architecture Board.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the post-crisis global prudential regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). It strengthens bank resilience by enhancing capital quality and quantity, constraining leverage, and mandating liquidity buffers. The framework uses a multi-metric, risk-based approach with non-risk-based backstops to address GFC weaknesses.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Capital ratios (CET1 ≥4.5%, Tier 1 ≥6%, Total ≥8%) + buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB); leverage ratio ≥3%; LCR ≥100%; NSFR ≥100%.
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review (ICAAP, stress testing).
- **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures (RWA comparability, LR1/LR2, CDC templates). No certification; national compliance model with output floor constraints.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory via jurisdictional laws for internationally active banks.
- Builds resilience, reduces systemic risk, improves RWA comparability.
- Enables buffer usability, stakeholder trust, avoids penalties; optimizes asset allocation, funding.
Implementation Overview
- Phased enterprise transformation: governance, data/IT upgrades, models, reporting.
- Targets banks globally; proportionality by size/complexity.
- Supervisory oversight, Pillar 3 audits; multi-year timelines.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards |
| Industry | All industries, global enterprises | Banking and financial institutions globally |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology framework | Mandatory prudential regulatory standards |
| Testing | Maturity assessments, compliance reviews | Stress tests, ICAAP, supervisory reviews |
| Penalties | None; loss of certification/reputation | Fines, restrictions, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and Basel III
TOGAF FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EU AI Act vs ISO 28000
Compare EU AI Act vs ISO 28000: Master AI compliance risks, high-risk obligations & supply chain security frameworks. Unlock strategies for resilience & regulatory alignment now!
PMBOK vs TISAX
Discover PMBOK vs TISAX: Compare project management standards and automotive security frameworks for compliance, strategy, and implementation. Boost efficiency and security now!
ISO 22000 vs IATF 16949
ISO 22000 vs IATF 16949: Compare food safety FSMS & automotive QMS. HLS alignment, dual PDCA, PRPs/HACCP vs core tools. Expert insights for compliance & integration success!