TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance
FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for food safety management systems
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning business and IT globally, while FSSC 22000 is a GFSI certification scheme for food safety systems. Companies adopt TOGAF for strategic IT governance; FSSC 22000 for supply chain compliance and market access.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- 1. Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
- 2. Content Metamodel ensuring traceable architecture outputs
- 3. Enterprise Continuum classifying reusable assets
- 4. Architecture Capability Framework for governance
- 5. Reference models promoting standards-based interoperability
FSSC 22000
Food Safety System Certification 22000 (FSSC 22000)
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked for global supply chain recognition
- Integrates ISO 22000, PRPs, and Additional Requirements
- Covers food chain categories B-K with tailored PRPs
- Mandates food defense, fraud, and allergen management
- Requires 50% operational audit time and culture objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. It enables organizations to design, plan, implement, and govern enterprise-wide change aligning business strategy with IT. Core: iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) lifecycle.
Key Components
- **ADMPreliminary, Vision, Business/Information Systems/Technology Architectures, Opportunities/Solutions, Migration, Governance, Change Management (10 phases total).
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs/matrices/diagrams), building blocks; Content Metamodel for entities/relationships.
- Enterprise Continuum/Repository for reuse; Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM).
- **Architecture Capability FrameworkGovernance, boards, skills, maturity. Practitioner certification available.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives efficiency, reuse, ROI via traceability and standards.
- Avoids vendor lock-in, supports agility in transformations.
- Enhances risk management, compliance, strategic alignment.
- Builds trust through consistent methods and governance.
Implementation Overview
- Tailored, phased ADM: assess maturity, pilot, scale.
- Involves stakeholder engagement, repository setup, training.
- Ideal for large enterprises across industries; voluntary adoption.
- No mandatory audits; focuses on capability building. (178 words)
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies across food chain categories like manufacturing, packaging, and logistics, using a risk-based PDCA approach integrating ISO 22000:2018 requirements.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsISO 22000:2018 (clauses 4-10), sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, allergens).
- Over 100 requirements across management, operations, and verification.
- Built on HACCP principles; third-party certification via licensed bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer/supply chain demands; enables global market access.
- Reduces recalls, enhances risk management for fraud/defense.
- Builds stakeholder trust via public register; supports ESG/SDGs.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, audits.
- For food organizations worldwide; Stage 1/2 certification, annual surveillance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | FSSC 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture across business/IT domains | Food safety management systems and PRPs |
| Industry | All industries, enterprise-wide IT operations | Food chain sectors (manufacturing, packaging, logistics) |
| Nature | Voluntary EA methodology/framework | GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme |
| Testing | Internal governance reviews, maturity assessments | Third-party certification audits (initial/surveillance) |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance effectiveness | Loss of certification, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and FSSC 22000
TOGAF FAQ
FSSC 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!
Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UAE PDPL vs ISO 41001
Compare UAE PDPL vs ISO 41001: Data privacy law meets FM standard. Uncover gaps, synergies, compliance strategies & UAE implementation tips for seamless alignment. Dive in!
WEEE vs ISA 95
Discover WEEE vs ISA 95: Compare EU e-waste regs with manufacturing standards. Boost compliance, circular strategy & ops for electronics leaders. Dive in now!
CMMC vs Basel III
CMMC vs Basel III: Compare DoD cybersecurity maturity model with banking capital/liquidity standards. Strategies, pitfalls, implementation for compliance success.