TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture development
GLBA
U.S. law for financial privacy and data safeguards.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for aligning business and IT globally, while GLBA mandates US financial privacy notices and security programs. Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic efficiency, GLBA to avoid severe regulatory penalties.
TOGAF
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle across architecture phases
- Content Metamodel standardizing deliverables and artifacts
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable asset governance
- Reference models like TRM and III-RM
- Architecture Capability Framework for skills and governance
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Privacy notices and opt-out for NPI sharing
- Written safeguards program with risk assessment
- Qualified Individual and board reporting
- 30-day breach notification for 500+ consumers
- Service provider oversight and contracts
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework developed by The Open Group. Its primary purpose is to provide a proven methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide IT and business change. The core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), a cyclical process spanning preliminary preparation to ongoing change management.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision (A), Business (B), Information Systems (C), Technology (D), Opportunities & Solutions (E), Migration Planning (F), Implementation Governance (G), Change Management (H), plus continuous Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks, and Metamodel with core entities like actors, services, data.
- Built on principles of reusability, governance, and tailoring; no fixed controls but structured outputs.
- Certification via Open Group portfolio for practitioners.
Why Organizations Use It
Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic alignment of business and IT, reducing duplication, accelerating delivery via reuse, and improving ROI. It mitigates risks in transformations, avoids vendor lock-in, and supports compliance in regulated sectors. Benefits include better governance, stakeholder communication, and agility in complex environments.
Implementation Overview
Tailored iterative ADM cycles, starting with maturity assessment and governance setup. Key activities: baseline/target architectures, gap analysis, roadmaps, repository build. Suited for large/mid-sized enterprises across industries; phased rollout (foundation, pilot, scale) over 12-18 months. No mandatory audits, but internal governance via Architecture Board.
GLBA Details
What It Is
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). GLBA uses a risk-based approach through its Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule, enforced primarily by the FTC for non-banks.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Initial/annual notices, opt-out for nonaffiliated sharing.
- **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Written security program with 9+ elements including risk assessment, Qualified Individual, board reporting.
- **Pretexting protectionsAnti-social engineering measures. Built on transparency, choice, and security; compliance via self-attestation, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for financial entities (broad scope: banks, lenders, tax firms). Drives risk reduction, breach prevention, regulatory avoidance (fines up to $100K/violation). Enhances trust, operational resilience, vendor management.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, risk assessment, controls (encryption, MFA), testing, training. Applies to U.S. financial activities; audits via enforcement actions.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | GLBA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance | Consumer financial privacy and data security |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any size | Financial institutions, primarily US |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology framework | Mandatory federal regulation |
| Testing | Maturity assessments, compliance reviews | Risk assessments, penetration testing, audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Fines up to $100k per violation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and GLBA
TOGAF FAQ
GLBA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs CIS Controls
Compare DORA vs CIS Controls: EU finance regs vs global cyber best practices. Master ICT risks, resilience testing & third-party oversight—choose wisely now!
NIS2 vs Basel III
Compare NIS2 vs Basel III: Cybersecurity scope expansion & fines meet banking capital, liquidity rules. Unpack requirements, compliance—master both now!
ISO 27017 vs NERC CIP
Compare ISO 27017 vs NERC CIP: Cloud code vs grid mandates. Uncover controls, scopes, audits & compliance paths for CSPs/utilities. Secure smarter—read now!