TOGAF
Vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework for IT alignment
IEC 62443
International standard for IACS cybersecurity framework
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning business and IT globally, while IEC 62443 delivers cybersecurity standards for industrial control systems. Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic coherence and IEC 62443 for OT risk mitigation and compliance.
TOGAF
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) lifecycle
- Content Framework with Metamodel for traceability
- Enterprise Continuum for asset classification and reuse
- Reference Models including TRM and III-RM
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance
IEC 62443
IEC 62443: IACS Security Standards Series
Key Features
- Zones and conduits segmentation model
- Security levels SL-T, SL-C, SL-A triad
- Shared responsibility for stakeholders
- Seven foundational requirements FR1-7
- ISASecure modular certifications
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework developed by The Open Group. Its primary purpose is to provide a methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide IT and business change. The core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for various organizational contexts.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision, Business, Information Systems, Technology, Opportunities, Migration, Governance, Change Management, plus ongoing Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, and Metamodel for core entities like actors and services.
- Enterprise Continuum, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM), and Architecture Capability Framework for governance.
- No fixed controls; certification via Open Group paths for practitioners.
Why Organizations Use It
Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic alignment, reuse, risk reduction, and efficiency in complex transformations. It avoids vendor lock-in, enables Boundaryless Information Flow, and supports governance in regulated industries. Benefits include cost savings, faster delivery, and improved ROI through traceability.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: preparation, pilot, scale via tailored ADM iterations. Applies to large enterprises across industries; requires repository, training, Architecture Board. Voluntary, with practitioner certification but no organizational audits.
IEC 62443 Details
What It Is
IEC 62443 (ISA/IEC 62443 series) is an international consensus-based standard series for cybersecurity in Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). Its primary purpose is securing OT environments across the lifecycle, using a risk-based approach with zones/conduits and security levels (SL 0–4).
Key Components
- Four groupings: General (-1), Policies (-2), System (-3), Components (-4)
- Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1–7) like IAC, RDF, RA
- ~127 CSMS requirements in -2-1; SRs/CRs in -3-3/-4-2
- ISASecure modular certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA)
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates OT risks (safety, downtime) amid IIoT connectivity
- Meets regulatory references (e.g., NIS-2, NERC CIP alignments)
- Enables procurement assurance, supply chain risk reduction
- Builds stakeholder trust via certified components/systems
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance (CSMS), risk assessment (-3-2), segmentation, controls
- Applies to asset owners, integrators, suppliers in critical sectors
- Global, voluntary but strategic for OT-heavy industries
- Involves audits, maturity levels (ML1–4), ongoing verification (Word count: 178)
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | IEC 62443 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture methodology across business/IT domains | IACS/OT cybersecurity risk assessment and controls |
| Industry | All industries, enterprise-wide, global applicability | Industrial sectors (energy, manufacturing, utilities), OT-focused |
| Nature | Voluntary EA framework and methodology | Consensus cybersecurity standards series with certification |
| Testing | Architecture compliance reviews and maturity assessments | ISASecure certification, SL capability/achievement testing |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance effectiveness | No direct penalties, regulatory/operational risk exposure |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and IEC 62443
TOGAF FAQ
IEC 62443 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 14001 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare ISO 14001 vs 23 NYCRR 500: EMS excellence meets NY cybersecurity mandates. Decode risks, governance & compliance diffs for integrated strategy. Boost resilience now.
COBIT vs AS9110C
Discover COBIT vs AS9110C: IT governance meets aerospace QMS. Compare frameworks, align enterprise IT with maintenance compliance, optimize risk & value. Unlock insights now!
CMMI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare CMMI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Discover key differences in maturity models, governance, and compliance for superior cyber risk management. Expert guide inside!