Standards Comparison

    TOGAF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture methodology

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for aligning business and IT across industries, while ISO 13485 mandates a certified QMS for medical devices ensuring safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance. Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic agility and ISO 13485 for market access.

    Enterprise Architecture

    TOGAF

    TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) lifecycle
    • Content Metamodel for consistent traceable artifacts
    • Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable architecture assets
    • Reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM) for interoperability
    • Architecture Capability Framework for governance structures
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based QMS controls across device lifecycle
    • Design development verification and validation
    • Traceability and medical device files
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    TOGAF Details

    What It Is

    TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. It enables designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Primary methodology is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) spanning business, data, application, and technology domains.

    Key Components

    • **ADM10 phases from Preliminary to Change Management, with ongoing Requirements Management.
    • **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks, and Metamodel.
    • **Enterprise ContinuumClassifies reusable assets in Architecture Repository.
    • **Reference ModelsTRM, SIB, III-RM for standards and interoperability.
    • **Capability FrameworkGovernance via Architecture Board, compliance, skills. Practitioner certification available, no organizational certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency and ROI.
    • Enables reuse, reducing duplication and costs.
    • Strengthens governance, risk management, agility.
    • Avoids vendor lock-in, supports Boundaryless Information Flow.
    • Builds trust through standardized practices and certification.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased tailoring: maturity assessment, Preliminary setup, iterative ADM cycles, pilots scaling to enterprise. Key activities: governance establishment, repository tooling, stakeholder engagement. Ideal for large enterprises across industries; voluntary adoption.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016, officially Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is an international certification standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It covers the full device lifecycle from design to post-market, employing a risk-based approach for consistent safety, performance, and regulatory compliance.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
    • Emphasizes validation, traceability, risk management (ISO 14971), medical device files.
    • Built on process approach; certification via accredited bodies with stage 1/2 audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR 2026).
    • Reduces risks, costs of quality; builds stakeholder trust.
    • Strategic for suppliers, manufacturers; competitive edge in partnerships.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, internal audits.
    • Applies to all sizes in medtech; 9–18 months typical; requires certification audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    TOGAF
    Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance
    ISO 13485
    Medical device quality management system

    Industry

    TOGAF
    All industries, enterprise IT operations
    ISO 13485
    Medical devices and related services

    Nature

    TOGAF
    Voluntary methodology and framework
    ISO 13485
    Regulatory certification standard

    Testing

    TOGAF
    Internal governance reviews and maturity assessments
    ISO 13485
    External certification audits and internal audits

    Penalties

    TOGAF
    No legal penalties, loss of governance effectiveness
    ISO 13485
    Regulatory non-compliance, market access denial

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about TOGAF and ISO 13485

    TOGAF FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages