TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture methodology
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for aligning business and IT across industries, while ISO 13485 mandates a certified QMS for medical devices ensuring safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance. Organizations adopt TOGAF for strategic agility and ISO 13485 for market access.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) lifecycle
- Content Metamodel for consistent traceable artifacts
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable architecture assets
- Reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM) for interoperability
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance structures
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS controls across device lifecycle
- Design development verification and validation
- Traceability and medical device files
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. It enables designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Primary methodology is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) spanning business, data, application, and technology domains.
Key Components
- **ADM10 phases from Preliminary to Change Management, with ongoing Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks, and Metamodel.
- **Enterprise ContinuumClassifies reusable assets in Architecture Repository.
- **Reference ModelsTRM, SIB, III-RM for standards and interoperability.
- **Capability FrameworkGovernance via Architecture Board, compliance, skills. Practitioner certification available, no organizational certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency and ROI.
- Enables reuse, reducing duplication and costs.
- Strengthens governance, risk management, agility.
- Avoids vendor lock-in, supports Boundaryless Information Flow.
- Builds trust through standardized practices and certification.
Implementation Overview
Phased tailoring: maturity assessment, Preliminary setup, iterative ADM cycles, pilots scaling to enterprise. Key activities: governance establishment, repository tooling, stakeholder engagement. Ideal for large enterprises across industries; voluntary adoption.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016, officially Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is an international certification standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It covers the full device lifecycle from design to post-market, employing a risk-based approach for consistent safety, performance, and regulatory compliance.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
- Emphasizes validation, traceability, risk management (ISO 14971), medical device files.
- Built on process approach; certification via accredited bodies with stage 1/2 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR 2026).
- Reduces risks, costs of quality; builds stakeholder trust.
- Strategic for suppliers, manufacturers; competitive edge in partnerships.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, internal audits.
- Applies to all sizes in medtech; 9–18 months typical; requires certification audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance | Medical device quality management system |
| Industry | All industries, enterprise IT operations | Medical devices and related services |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology and framework | Regulatory certification standard |
| Testing | Internal governance reviews and maturity assessments | External certification audits and internal audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance effectiveness | Regulatory non-compliance, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and ISO 13485
TOGAF FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
Six Sigma vs NIST 800-171
Explore Six Sigma vs NIST 800-171: Data-driven quality vs CUI cybersecurity. Discover differences, synergies & strategies for compliance & excellence. Read now!
ISO 27001 vs WELL
Compare ISO 27001 vs WELL: ISO 27001 builds resilient ISMS for data security; WELL optimizes buildings for health via air, water, light & wellness. Boost compliance & occupant vitality—discover key differences now!
IATF 16949 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare IATF 16949 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Master automotive QMS and NYDFS cybersecurity compliance. Gain strategies for risk-based implementation, audits, and certification success now.