TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture and governance
ISO 17025
International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning business and IT in organizations worldwide, while ISO 17025 ensures laboratory competence and impartiality for testing/calibration. Companies adopt TOGAF for strategic alignment and ISO 17025 for credible, accredited results.
TOGAF
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF®) Standard
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for enterprise architecture development
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable architectural assets
- Content Framework with metamodel for traceability
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance
- Reference models like TRM and III-RM
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
Key Features
- Ensures competence, impartiality, consistent lab operations
- Risk-based thinking for impartiality and processes
- Metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty requirements
- Proficiency testing and method validation mandates
- Global accreditation via ILAC mutual recognition
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition by The Open Group is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) across business, data, application, and technology domains.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary to Change Management, plus continuous Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks via metamodel.
- Enterprise Continuum, reference models (TRM, III-RM), Architecture Capability Framework.
- Certification via Open Group portfolio for practitioners.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives strategic alignment, reduces duplication, accelerates delivery via reuse. Enables governance, risk management, vendor neutrality. Builds stakeholder trust, improves ROI in complex transformations. Voluntary but strategic for large enterprises.
Implementation Overview
Phased tailoring: foundation, pilot, scale. Involves maturity assessment, governance setup, repository, ADM iteration. Suits large organizations across industries; requires training, tools like ArchiMate repositories.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It is an accreditation framework focused on technical validity of results through risk-based thinking, ensuring scientifically defensible outputs.
Key Components
- Eight core elements: general, structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
- Covers impartiality/confidentiality (Clause 4), personnel competence, metrological traceability, method validation, uncertainty evaluation, and proficiency testing.
- Built on risk-based approach; Option A/B for management systems (standalone or ISO 9001-aligned).
- Accreditation model via ILAC-recognized bodies assessing competence within defined scopes.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access, regulatory acceptance, and international result recognition.
- Mitigates risks from invalid results in safety-critical domains.
- Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge, and operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased PDCA: gap analysis, documentation, technical validation, audits.
- Applies to labs globally; suits various sizes/industries.
- Requires accreditation audits with witnessed testing.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | ISO 17025 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance | Laboratory testing/calibration competence and impartiality |
| Industry | All industries, large enterprises worldwide | Testing/calibration labs across sectors globally |
| Nature | Voluntary EA methodology/framework | Accreditation standard for technical competence |
| Testing | Architecture reviews and compliance assessments | Proficiency testing, witnessed activities, audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance benefits | Loss of accreditation, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and ISO 17025
TOGAF FAQ
ISO 17025 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs POPIA
Discover K-PIPA vs POPIA: Korea's consent-centric regime vs SA's 8 conditions & rights. Unlock differences, compliance strategies for global data pros. Compare now!
IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485: OT cybersecurity vs medical QMS standards. Key differences, synergies & integration tips for secure, compliant systems. Dive in now!
ISO 22000 vs EN 1090
ISO 22000 vs EN 1090: Compare food safety FSMS with steel/aluminium structural standards. Uncover key differences in requirements, certification, execution classes & benefits now!