UAE PDPL
UAE federal regulation for personal data protection onshore
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management
Quick Verdict
UAE PDPL mandates personal data protection across onshore UAE, ensuring rights and security. MAS TRM provides technology risk guidelines for Singapore FIs, emphasizing governance and cyber resilience. UAE firms comply legally; Singapore FIs adopt for supervision.
UAE PDPL
Federal Decree-Law No. 45/2021 on Personal Data Protection
Key Features
- Risk-based DPO and DPIA for high-risk processing
- Extraterritorial scope for foreign processors of UAE data
- Mandatory Records of Processing Activities for all entities
- Explicit carve-outs for free zones and sectoral data
- Privacy-by-design mandates pseudonymisation and security
MAS TRM
Technology Risk Management Guidelines (January 2021)
Key Features
- Board/senior management accountability for technology risks
- Proportional controls commensurate with risk profile
- Third-party risk assessment and ongoing monitoring
- Defence-in-depth cyber resilience requirements
- Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
UAE PDPL Details
What It Is
UAE PDPL (Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 Concerning the Protection of Personal Data) is a comprehensive federal regulation for onshore UAE personal data processing. Effective 2 January 2022, it standardizes privacy governance with a risk-based approach, embedding controls like fairness, minimization, and security.
Key Components
- Principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, accuracy, storage limitation, confidentiality.
- Obligations: lawful bases (consent primary), DPO/DPIA for high-risk, mandatory RoPA.
- Rights: access, portability, erasure, objection to profiling.
- Oversight by UAE Data Office; no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures legal compliance amid penalties and enforcement.
- Aligns with GDPR for multinationals, builds digital trust.
- Mitigates breach risks, enables secure cross-border flows.
- Enhances reputation in UAE's digital economy.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: discovery/mapping, remediation, operationalization, monitoring.
- Targets onshore private sector; excludes free zones/government/health/banking.
- Focuses on data inventory, vendor controls, breach response; self-assessed via records.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide principles-based guidance on managing technology and cyber risks across governance, operations, and resilience, emphasizing proportional implementation based on risk profile and complexity to ensure CIA (confidentiality, integrity, availability).
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventory, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
- No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes with independent assurance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines/enforcement.
- Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust.
- Supports digital transformation while managing third-party and ecosystem risks.
Implementation Overview
- Risk-based rollout: asset inventory, control mapping, testing regimes.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
- No formal certification; demonstrated via audits and supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | UAE PDPL | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing, rights, security, transfers | Technology risk governance, cybersecurity, resilience |
| Industry | Onshore private sector, all industries (excl. free zones) | Financial institutions under MAS supervision |
| Nature | Mandatory federal law with penalties | Supervisory guidelines, proportionate enforcement |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk processing | Annual PT for internet systems, vulnerability assessments |
| Penalties | Administrative fines (details pending regulations) | Supervisory actions, fines via other notices |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about UAE PDPL and MAS TRM
UAE PDPL FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
23 NYCRR 500 vs ISO 22301
Discover 23 NYCRR 500 vs ISO 22301: NYDFS cyber regs vs global BCMS. Compare governance, risk assessment, MFA, encryption & recovery for financial resilience. Align for peak compliance!
IEC 62443 vs COBIT
Discover IEC 62443 vs COBIT: OT cybersecurity powerhouse (zones, conduits, SLs) meets enterprise IT governance (EDM, APO). Optimize risk & compliance—compare now!
ISO 37301 vs ISO 27018
Compare ISO 37301 vs ISO 27018: Certifiable CMS standard vs cloud PII privacy code. HLS-aligned compliance or GDPR processor controls? Discover key diffs & benefits now!