UAE PDPL
UAE federal law regulating personal data processing onshore
SAMA CSF
Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
UAE PDPL regulates personal data protection across onshore UAE private sectors with rights and security mandates, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial institutions via governance and controls. Organizations adopt PDPL for privacy compliance, SAMA CSF for sector resilience.
UAE PDPL
Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on Personal Data Protection
Key Features
- Mandates DPOs and DPIAs for high-risk processing
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign processors of UAE data
- Requires records of processing for all controllers/processors
- Excludes free zones, government, health, banking data
- Enforces cross-border transfers via adequacy and safeguards
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
- Four core domains with detailed subdomains
- Board-level governance and CISO requirements
- Risk-based principle-oriented controls
- Third-party risk management mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
UAE PDPL Details
What It Is
UAE PDPL (Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 Concerning the Protection of Personal Data) is a comprehensive federal regulation establishing onshore UAE's economy-wide personal data protection framework. Effective 2 January 2022, it governs processing by controllers and processors via a risk-based approach, embedding principles like fairness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, security, and accountability.
Key Components
- Core processing controls (Articles 5-8) and data subject rights (Articles 13-19)
- Mandatory DPOs/DPIAs for high-risk activities (new tech, large volumes, sensitive data)
- Records of processing activities for all entities
- Breach notification (Article 9), security measures (Article 20), transfers (Articles 22-23)
- No certification; compliance demonstrated via records and audits
Why Organizations Use It
Drives legal compliance amid penalties, enhances trust in digital economy, aligns with GDPR for multinationals. Mitigates breach risks, supports cross-border operations, boosts reputation in layered UAE regimes (free zones, sectors excluded).
Implementation Overview
Phased: discovery/mapping, governance (DPO), controls (security, DPIAs), rights management. Applies to onshore private sector; 6-12 months typical via risk-based programs, tools like RoPAs.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF Version 1.0, May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority for financial institutions. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity governance, controls, and maturity, ensuring detection, resistance, response, and recovery from threats in the financial sector.
Key Components
- Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third Party Cyber Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (over 100 subcontrols).
- Six-level maturity model (minimum Level 3: structured and formalized).
- Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; enforced via self-assessments and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for SAMA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid penalties, audits, fines.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risks, improves efficiency.
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, competitive edge in Saudi finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control roadmap, deployment, monitoring, audits.
- Targets financial sector in Saudi Arabia; scalable by size.
- Requires board sponsorship, documentation pyramid, continuous improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | UAE PDPL | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing, rights, security, transfers | Cybersecurity governance, risk mgmt, operations, third-parties |
| Industry | Onshore private sector, excludes free zones/health/banking | Saudi financial institutions (banks, insurance, financing) |
| Nature | Federal data protection law, mandatory | Principle-based cybersecurity framework, mandatory |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk, records of processing | Maturity self-assessments, periodic audits |
| Penalties | Administrative fines (details pending), criminal overlap | Supervisory actions, remediation, no specific fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about UAE PDPL and SAMA CSF
UAE PDPL FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic
Ace your SOC 2 Type 2 audit with the first 5 essential steps: evidence collection, auditor tips, red flags from SignWell's experience. Get checklists & infograp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
C-TPAT vs ISO 27018
Discover C-TPAT vs ISO 27018: Compare CBP's supply chain security for trusted trade with cloud PII privacy controls. Boost compliance, cut risks—choose wisely now!
K-PIPA vs NERC CIP
Unlock K-PIPA vs NERC CIP: Korea's strict privacy law (consent, CPOs, 72h breaches) meets U.S. grid cyber standards (CIP scoping, perimeters). Compare & comply smarter.
POPIA vs ISO 41001
Compare POPIA vs ISO 41001: SA's privacy law vs global FM standard. Uncover compliance gaps, risks, governance & synergies for streamlined data & facility security now.