What is the primary objective of **WCAG**?

**The primary objective of WCAG is to provide internationally recognized, technology-agnostic guidelines for making web content accessible to people with disabilities.** WCAG, developed by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, organizes requirements under four principles—**Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust (POUR)**—with 13 guidelines and testable **success criteria** at Levels A, AA, and AAA. It addresses visual, auditory, physical, speech, cognitive, and neurological disabilities while improving usability for all users.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **WCAG**?

**WCAG compliance is required for public-sector entities and organizations facing accessibility regulations that reference it as the technical standard.** U.S. public entities must meet **WCAG 2.1 Level AA** under DOJ Title II rules (deadlines 2026/2027 by size) and Section 508 for federal ICT. Enterprises in e-commerce, healthcare, finance, and education comply via ADA Title III litigation benchmarks, EU EN 301 549/EAA (effective June 28, 2025), and procurement contracts demanding VPAT/ACR reports.

Does **WCAG** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**WCAG does not require external audits or third-party certification for conformance.** Conformance is self-assessed by meeting all **success criteria** up to the chosen level (e.g., AA), full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported technologies, and non-interference. Organizations produce internal evidence (audit reports, test artifacts) and optional claims; independent audits enhance defensibility for litigation or procurement but are not mandated by W3C.

How often should an assessment for **WCAG** be performed?

**WCAG assessments should be performed continuously via CI/CD integration, with periodic full audits quarterly or biannually.** Integrate automated scans (e.g., axe-core) in development pipelines for regression detection; conduct manual/AT testing per release for critical paths; schedule expert audits annually or post-major changes to validate conformance across full pages and processes against success criteria.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **WCAG**?

**Non-compliance with WCAG exposes organizations to litigation, fines, contract losses, and remediation mandates.** U.S. ADA suits (thousands annually) demand sitewide fixes, settlements (e.g., millions for e-commerce), and monitoring; public entities face DOJ enforcement under Title II/Section 508; EU EAA violations risk €20k+ daily fines and market exclusion. Reputational damage and lost procurement follow partial claims failing "complete processes."

Can **WCAG** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, WCAG success criteria map directly to frameworks like EN 301 549, Section 508, and AODA as the shared technical baseline.** WCAG 2.1 AA aligns with EN 301 549 (EU ICT standard underpinning EAA) and U.S. Section 508 Revised 508 Standards; backward compatibility (2.1 extends 2.0) preserves mappings without renumbering criteria, enabling policy continuity in procurement and regulation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **WCAG**?

**The first step to implement WCAG is to conduct a Preliminary Review: inventory digital assets and baseline conformance against success criteria.** Identify high-traffic pages and critical processes (e.g., checkout, forms); run automated scans and manual checks to produce a prioritized gap analysis mapped to POUR principles and Levels A/AA. Establish governance, set **WCAG 2.1 AA** target, and publish an accessibility policy.

What is the primary objective of **EU AI Act**?

**The primary objective of the EU AI Act is to establish a risk-based regulatory framework that prohibits unacceptable-risk AI practices, imposes strict obligations on high-risk AI systems, mandates transparency for limited-risk systems, and promotes safe, trustworthy AI across the EU.** Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, effective 1 August 2024, protects health, safety, and fundamental rights via lifecycle controls like risk management (**Article 9**), data governance (**Article 10**), and conformity assessments (**Article 43**), while fostering innovation through phased timelines and harmonized standards (**Article 40**).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EU AI Act**?

**Providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives of AI systems used in or outputting to the EU must comply with the EU AI Act, regardless of location.** Providers (developers placing systems on the market, **Article 3(3)**) bear primary high-risk duties; deployers (professional users, **Article 3(4)**) handle oversight and monitoring. Scope captures third-country entities via EU output nexus (**Article 2**), including GPAI model providers (**Chapter V**).

Does **EU AI Act** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**High-risk AI systems require conformity assessment, which may involve third-party notified bodies and external audits, but internal assessments suffice in some cases.** **Article 43** mandates EU Declaration of Conformity (**Article 47**) and CE marking (**Article 48**); Annex VII pathways use notified bodies (**Articles 28–39**) for certain Annex III systems. Quality management systems (**Article 17**) undergo periodic surveillance audits.

How often should an assessment for **EU AI Act** be performed?

**Risk classification and conformity assessments for EU AI Act must be performed prior to market placement or service, with continuous post-market monitoring thereafter.** Initial assessment occurs before placing high-risk systems on the market (**Article 16**); substantial modifications trigger reassessment (**Article 3(23)**). Post-market monitoring (**Article 72**) is ongoing, with logs retained at least six months (**Article 19**) and serious incidents reported without delay (**Article 73**).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EU AI Act**?

**Non-compliance with EU AI Act incurs tiered administrative fines up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover or €40 million for prohibited practices, plus market bans and corrective actions.** Prohibited violations (**Article 5**) attract highest penalties (**Article 99**); high-risk failures up to 4% or €20 million; others up to 2% or €10 million (**Article 101** for GPAI). Authorities impose suspensions, recalls (**Article 74**), and personal liability.

Can **EU AI Act** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, EU AI Act compliance FAQs stand alone and do not map to other frameworks per independent content requirements.**

What is the first step to begin implementing **EU AI Act**?

**The first step to implement EU AI Act is to conduct an AI inventory and risk classification against prohibited practices (**Article 5**), Annex I, and Annex III.** Map systems to roles (provider/deployer), document non-high-risk rationales (**Article 6(4)**), and prioritize high-risk obligations ahead of phased deadlines (prohibitions 6 months post-force, GPAI 12 months, high-risk 24–36 months).

WCAG vs EU AI Act

Standards Comparison

WCAG

Voluntary

2023

Global standard for accessible web content and interfaces

EU AI Act

Mandatory

2024

EU regulation for risk-based AI governance and safety

Quick Verdict

WCAG provides testable guidelines for accessible web content globally, while EU AI Act mandates risk-based compliance for AI systems in EU. Companies adopt WCAG to avoid lawsuits and improve UX; AI Act for legal market access and safety.

Web Accessibility

WCAG

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WCAG 2.2

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Four POUR principles for comprehensive accessibility
Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
Technology-agnostic across web platforms and frameworks
Backward-compatible additive version updates
Normative criteria separated from informative techniques

Artificial Intelligence

EU AI Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Artificial Intelligence Act

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Risk-based four-tier AI classification framework
Prohibits unacceptable-risk AI practices outright
High-risk conformity assessments and CE marking
GPAI model transparency and systemic risk duties
Tiered fines up to 7% global turnover

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

WCAG Details

What It Is

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation, a technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria ensuring equal access across visual, auditory, motor, cognitive needs. WCAG uses a layered approach: principles, guidelines, and normative success criteria.

Key Components

**Four POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
13 guidelines with ~90 success criteria at Levels A, AA, AAA.
Informative techniques, understanding docs, and Quick Reference.
Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives legal compliance (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA), reduces litigation risk, expands market reach. Enhances UX, SEO, conversion rates; builds stakeholder trust via inclusive design.

Implementation Overview

Phased: policy, assessment, remediation via design systems/CI tools, training, audits. Applies to all web publishers globally; no formal certification but VPAT/ACR claims common. Targets AA for enterprises.

EU AI Act Details

What It Is

EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is a comprehensive EU regulation establishing the first horizontal framework for AI. It adopts a risk-based approach, prohibiting unacceptable-risk practices, regulating high-risk systems, imposing transparency on limited-risk AI, and minimally regulating others. Scope covers AI providers, deployers, and value-chain actors across sectors, with extraterritorial reach.

Key Components

**Four risk tiersprohibited, high-risk (Annex I/III), limited-risk (transparency), minimal-risk.
High-risk obligations: risk management (Article 9), data governance (Article 10), documentation (Articles 11-13), human oversight (Article 14), cybersecurity (Article 15).
GPAI model rules (Chapter V), conformity assessments, CE marking, EU database registration.
Built on product-safety principles; presumption of conformity via harmonized standards.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to 7% global turnover.
Enhances risk management, trust, market access in EU.
Drives better AI quality, vendor accountability, competitive edge.

Implementation Overview

Phased rollout (6-36 months); inventory AI assets, classify risks, build QMS/RMS, conduct assessments. Applies to all sizes targeting EU; audits via notified bodies for high-risk.

Key Differences

Aspect	WCAG	EU AI Act
Scope	Web content accessibility for disabilities	AI systems risk management and safety
Industry	All web-publishing organizations globally	AI providers/deployers in EU primarily
Nature	Voluntary W3C technical guidelines	Mandatory EU regulation with fines
Testing	Automated/manual audits, WCAG levels	Conformity assessments, notified bodies
Penalties	No direct penalties, litigation risk	Up to 7% global turnover fines

Scope

WCAG

Web content accessibility for disabilities

EU AI Act

AI systems risk management and safety

Industry

WCAG

All web-publishing organizations globally

EU AI Act

AI providers/deployers in EU primarily

Nature

WCAG

Voluntary W3C technical guidelines

EU AI Act

Mandatory EU regulation with fines

Testing

WCAG

Automated/manual audits, WCAG levels

EU AI Act

Conformity assessments, notified bodies

Penalties

WCAG

No direct penalties, litigation risk

EU AI Act

Up to 7% global turnover fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WCAG and EU AI Act

WCAG FAQ

EU AI Act FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs RoHS

ISO 9001 vs RoHS: Compare QMS excellence for ops efficiency vs EEE hazardous substance limits. Discover key diffs, benefits & strategies for compliance mastery.

DORA vs NERC CIP

Discover DORA vs NERC CIP: EU finance resilience vs North American grid cyber standards. Compare scopes, mandates, testing & risks for compliance mastery. Boost your strategy now.

POPIA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Discover POPIA vs U.S. SEC cybersecurity rules: Key differences in compliance, governance, breach reporting & risk management. Optimize your global strategy now!

WCAG

EU AI Act

Quick Verdict

WCAG

Key Features

EU AI Act

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

WCAG Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

EU AI Act Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

WCAG FAQ

What is the primary objective of WCAG?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with WCAG?

Does WCAG require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for WCAG be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with WCAG?

Can WCAG be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing WCAG?

EU AI Act FAQ

What is the primary objective of EU AI Act?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EU AI Act?

Does EU AI Act require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EU AI Act be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EU AI Act?

Can EU AI Act be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EU AI Act?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs RoHS

DORA vs NERC CIP

POPIA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules