WCAG
Global standard for web accessibility to disabilities
ISO 56002
International guidance standard for innovation management systems
Quick Verdict
WCAG ensures web accessibility for disabled users via testable criteria, while ISO 56002 builds innovation systems for value creation. Companies adopt WCAG for legal compliance and inclusion; ISO 56002 for strategic governance and competitive advantage.
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2
Key Features
- Four POUR principles organize accessibility requirements
- Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
- Technology-agnostic for all web content types
- Backward compatible incremental version updates
- Separates normative requirements from techniques
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for structured IMS implementation
- Emphasizes top-management leadership commitment
- Portfolio governance with stage-gate processes
- Balanced KPIs for performance evaluation
- Tailorable guidance for all organization sizes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation, the global standard for web content accessibility. It defines testable success criteria to ensure content is perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for people with disabilities. Scope includes all web technologies; layered approach uses principles, guidelines, and criteria.
Key Components
- **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
- 13 guidelines with ~90 success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels.
- Informative techniques, failures, and understanding documents.
- Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns with laws (ADA, Section 508, EAA/EN 301 549).
- Mitigates litigation, boosts UX/conversion/SEO.
- Enables procurement, enhances reputation/inclusion.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance/policy, assessment, remediation via design systems/CI tools, training, monitoring.
- Applies universally; no formal certification but VPATs/audits common. (178 words)
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It applies to organizations of all sizes and sectors, using a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle structured across Clauses 4-10 to manage innovation strategically.
Key Components
- Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leaders, strategic direction, culture, insights, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking.
- Non-prescriptive; tailorable processes like portfolio governance and stage-gates.
- Aligns with Annex SL for integration; no fixed controls, optional certification via ISO 56001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives measurable innovation outcomes and ROI.
- Enhances resilience, agility, and competitive edge.
- Builds stakeholder trust; no legal mandate but strategic for markets valuing innovation capability.
- Mitigates risks like project failure and resource waste.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: diagnostic, design, pilot, scale, sustain (12-18 months typical).
- Involves maturity assessments (e.g., PII), policy development, tooling, audits.
- Universal applicability; pragmatic for SMEs via staged adoption.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WCAG | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Web content accessibility for disabilities | Innovation management systems organization-wide |
| Industry | All web-publishing sectors globally | All sectors and sizes worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary W3C guidelines, technology-agnostic | Voluntary ISO guidance, management framework |
| Testing | Automated scans, manual audits, user testing | Internal audits, management reviews, KPIs |
| Penalties | Litigation under ADA, no direct fines | No penalties, business performance risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WCAG and ISO 56002
WCAG FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LGPD vs EN 1090
Compare LGPD vs EN 1090: Brazil's data privacy law meets EU steel standards. Unlock compliance gaps, risks, strategies & execution classes for global success. Dive in now!
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs SQF
CSL vs SQF: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law with food safety standards. Navigate compliance risks, data localization & HACCP strategies for global ops. Unlock advantages now!
ISO 30301 vs ISO 28000
ISO 30301 vs ISO 28000: Records governance for evidence & compliance meets supply chain security resilience. Compare requirements, benefits & integration. Boost your strategy now!