Standards Comparison

    WCAG

    Voluntary
    2023

    Global standard for accessible web content for disabilities

    VS

    SOX

    Mandatory
    2002

    U.S. law for financial reporting accuracy and internal controls

    Quick Verdict

    WCAG provides testable web accessibility guidelines for global inclusivity, while SOX mandates U.S. public company financial controls with severe penalties. Organizations adopt WCAG for legal defense and UX; SOX for investor protection and governance.

    Web Accessibility

    WCAG

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Four POUR principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust
    • Testable success criteria at A, AA, AAA conformance levels
    • Technology-agnostic guidelines applicable across web technologies
    • Backward-compatible additive updates preserving policy continuity
    • Normative criteria separated from evolvable informative techniques
    Financial Reporting

    SOX

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • CEO/CFO personal certification of financial reports
    • Section 404 ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation
    • PCAOB oversight of public company auditors
    • Auditor independence and rotation requirements
    • Whistleblower protections and criminal penalties

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WCAG Details

    What It Is

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's technology-agnostic standard for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria organized under **four POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust, covering visual, auditory, motor, cognitive needs.

    Key Components

    • 13 guidelines under POUR, with ~90 success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels.
    • Normative success criteria for conformance; informative techniques for implementation.
    • Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.
    • No formal certification; self-assessed claims with optional VPAT/ACR.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Meets legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA); reduces litigation risk amid rising lawsuits. Enhances UX, expands market reach (1B+ disabled users), improves SEO/conversion. Builds stakeholder trust via inclusive design.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased program: policy/governance, audits, design systems, CI/CD tools (axe-core), training, monitoring. Applies enterprise-wide; AA baseline recommended. Hybrid testing (automated/manual/user); 6-12 months typical for maturity.

    SOX Details

    What It Is

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal regulation mandating corporate accountability and investor protection. Enacted post-Enron scandals, it targets financial reporting reliability through internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) using a risk-based, top-down approach aligned with frameworks like COSO.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications and ICFR assessments (Titles III-IV).
    • Key sections: 302 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
    • Built on COSO principles; no fixed control count, focuses on key controls.
    • Compliance via annual 10-K reporting and PCAOB audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for U.S. public companies to avoid penalties.
    • Enhances investor trust, reduces restatements, lowers capital costs.
    • Drives operational efficiency, fraud deterrence, M&A readiness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, remediation, monitoring.
    • Applies to public issuers; scaled for size (exemptions for smaller filers).
    • Requires external auditor attestation for most; ongoing continuous monitoring.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WCAG
    Web content accessibility for disabilities
    SOX
    Financial reporting internal controls

    Industry

    WCAG
    All industries, global web publishers
    SOX
    U.S. public companies, financial reporting

    Nature

    WCAG
    Voluntary W3C technical guidelines
    SOX
    Mandatory U.S. federal statute

    Testing

    WCAG
    Automated/manual/AT/user testing
    SOX
    Annual ICFR design/operating tests

    Penalties

    WCAG
    Litigation risk, no direct fines
    SOX
    Criminal fines, imprisonment

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WCAG and SOX

    WCAG FAQ

    SOX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages