WEEE
EU directive for end-of-life management of electrical equipment
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
WEEE mandates EU-wide e-waste management for electronics producers via EPR and collection targets, while APRA CPS 234 enforces information security resilience for Australian financial entities with board accountability, testing, and rapid incident reporting. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and operational resilience.
WEEE
Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Key Features
- Imposes Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) on producers
- Open scope covers all electrical/electronic equipment since 2018
- Mandates 65% collection targets or 85% generated WEEE
- Requires selective depollution and treatment standards
- Enforces national registration and harmonized reporting
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
- Systematic testing and independent assurance required
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Third-party risk management for all assets
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WEEE Details
What It Is
Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE Directive) is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Its primary purpose is to minimize e-waste impacts via prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery, covering all EEE under open scope since 2018. It uses a systemic approach with collection targets, treatment standards, and traceability.
Key Components
- Six open-scope categories in Annex III for EEE classification.
- **EPR pillarsproducer registration, financing, take-back, reporting.
- **Targets65% of EEE placed on market (POM) or 85% generated; recovery/recycling rates per category.
- **Compliance modelnational transposition, PRO schemes, harmonized reporting via implementing acts.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces environmental risks, recovers critical materials. Drives circular economy, cuts EPR fees via eco-design, builds stakeholder trust amid Green Deal priorities.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, multi-country registration, PRO joining, data systems for POM/reporting. Applies to producers/importers EU-wide; high complexity for multinationals, no central certification but national audits.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, proportionate controls, and assurance.
Key Components
- **Governance and accountabilityBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles.
- **Core requirementsAsset classification, controls across lifecycle, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit assurance.
- 36 paragraphs of enforceable obligations; no fixed control count, but risk-proportionate.
- Compliance model via evidence of testing, remediation, and APRA notifications (72 hours for incidents, 10 days for weaknesses).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, super funds to avoid penalties, enforcement.
- Enhances resilience, reduces operational risk, builds customer trust.
- Strategic benefits: competitive edge, better vendor terms, cost avoidance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires ongoing assurance, no formal certification but APRA scrutiny.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WEEE | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | EEE waste management, collection, recycling, producer responsibility | Information security governance, controls, incident response |
| Industry | Electronics producers, all industries EU-wide | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive, national enforcement | Mandatory prudential standard, APRA enforcement |
| Testing | Treatment/recovery validation, no mandated frequency | Systematic independent testing, annual reviews |
| Penalties | National fines, market restrictions | Supervisory actions, remediation orders |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WEEE and APRA CPS 234
WEEE FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APPI vs GRI
Compare APPI vs GRI: Japan's privacy law meets global sustainability standards. Master compliance strategies, pitfalls, and frameworks for data protection & ESG reporting excellence.
ISO 9001 vs SAMA CSF
Compare ISO 9001 vs SAMA CSF: Quality excellence meets cyber resilience for Saudi finance. Uncover differences, benefits & strategies to elevate compliance now.
PCI DSS vs TOGAF
Compare PCI DSS vs TOGAF: PCI DSS enforces payment data security with 12 strict controls, while TOGAF drives agile enterprise architecture. Uncover differences, benefits, and integration strategies for compliance success.