Standards Comparison

    WEEE

    Mandatory
    2012

    EU directive for end-of-life management of electrical equipment

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    WEEE mandates EU-wide e-waste management for electronics producers via EPR and collection targets, while APRA CPS 234 enforces information security resilience for Australian financial entities with board accountability, testing, and rapid incident reporting. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and operational resilience.

    Waste Management

    WEEE

    Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Imposes Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) on producers
    • Open scope covers all electrical/electronic equipment since 2018
    • Mandates 65% collection targets or 85% generated WEEE
    • Requires selective depollution and treatment standards
    • Enforces national registration and harmonized reporting
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
    • Systematic testing and independent assurance required
    • 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
    • Third-party risk management for all assets

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WEEE Details

    What It Is

    Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE Directive) is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Its primary purpose is to minimize e-waste impacts via prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery, covering all EEE under open scope since 2018. It uses a systemic approach with collection targets, treatment standards, and traceability.

    Key Components

    • Six open-scope categories in Annex III for EEE classification.
    • **EPR pillarsproducer registration, financing, take-back, reporting.
    • **Targets65% of EEE placed on market (POM) or 85% generated; recovery/recycling rates per category.
    • **Compliance modelnational transposition, PRO schemes, harmonized reporting via implementing acts.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU market access; reduces environmental risks, recovers critical materials. Drives circular economy, cuts EPR fees via eco-design, builds stakeholder trust amid Green Deal priorities.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, multi-country registration, PRO joining, data systems for POM/reporting. Applies to producers/importers EU-wide; high complexity for multinationals, no central certification but national audits.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, proportionate controls, and assurance.

    Key Components

    • **Governance and accountabilityBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles.
    • **Core requirementsAsset classification, controls across lifecycle, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit assurance.
    • 36 paragraphs of enforceable obligations; no fixed control count, but risk-proportionate.
    • Compliance model via evidence of testing, remediation, and APRA notifications (72 hours for incidents, 10 days for weaknesses).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for banks, insurers, super funds to avoid penalties, enforcement.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces operational risk, builds customer trust.
    • Strategic benefits: competitive edge, better vendor terms, cost avoidance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires ongoing assurance, no formal certification but APRA scrutiny.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WEEE
    EEE waste management, collection, recycling, producer responsibility
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security governance, controls, incident response

    Industry

    WEEE
    Electronics producers, all industries EU-wide
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super)

    Nature

    WEEE
    Mandatory EU directive, national enforcement
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard, APRA enforcement

    Testing

    WEEE
    Treatment/recovery validation, no mandated frequency
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    WEEE
    National fines, market restrictions
    APRA CPS 234
    Supervisory actions, remediation orders

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WEEE and APRA CPS 234

    WEEE FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages