WEEE
EU Directive for waste electrical and electronic equipment management
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
WEEE mandates EU producers manage e-waste via collection, recycling, and EPR to protect environment and recover materials. ISO 22301 provides voluntary BCMS framework for global resilience against disruptions. Companies adopt WEEE for legal compliance, ISO 22301 for operational continuity and certification advantages.
WEEE
Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Key Features
- Mandates Extended Producer Responsibility for EEE end-of-life
- Open scope covers all electrical equipment since 2018
- Enforces 65% collection targets from market-placed EEE
- Requires selective depollution and Annex II treatment
- Demands national registration and harmonized POM reporting
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and risk assessment
- Leadership commitment with policy and roles
- Operational testing and recovery strategies
- Annex SL alignment for ISO 27001 integration
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WEEE Details
What It Is
WEEE is Directive 2012/19/EU, a binding EU regulation on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. It establishes Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), requiring producers to finance and organize end-of-life management of EEE. Primary purpose: promote circular economy via waste prevention, reuse, recycling, recovery while minimizing health/environmental risks. Applies open scope to all EEE since 2018 (six Annex III categories), using data-driven, harmonized methodologies for targets and reporting.
Key Components
- **Producer obligationsnational registration, POM reporting, financing via PROs/individual schemes.
- **Collection targets65% average EEE POM (3 years) or 85% generated WEEE.
- **Treatment standardsselective depollution (Annex II), storage (Annex III), recovery/recycling thresholds.
- Built on waste hierarchy; enforced nationally, no EU certification but harmonized formats (e.g., 2019/290).
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU market access; avoids penalties, bans. Drives critical raw material recovery, supply security, Green Deal alignment. Enhances reputation, reduces EPR costs via eco-design; supports stakeholder demands for sustainability.
Implementation Overview
Country-by-country: gap analysis, registrations, PRO joining, data systems integration. Key steps: POM governance, scope classification, reverse logistics, audits. Suits producers/importers EU-wide; scalable for multinationals/SMEs via PROs; ongoing via evaluations (2025).
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is an international certification standard for Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS). It provides requirements to protect against, reduce likelihood of, respond to, and recover from disruptions, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle aligned with Annex SL for integration.
Key Components
- 10 clauses: scope, context (Clause 4), leadership (Clause 5), planning with BIA and risk assessment (Clause 6), support, operations/testing (Clause 8), evaluation, improvement (Clauses 9-10)
- Flexible, non-prescriptive requirements tailored to context
- Built on PDCA for continual enhancement
- 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds resilience against cyber, natural disasters, supply chain failures
- Meets regulatory needs (e.g., NIS Directive, NIST)
- Minimizes downtime, financial losses; enhances reputation and trust
- Provides competitive advantages, lower insurance, procurement edges
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis, BIA, training, testing, audits
- Phased: 60 days to 6 months typical
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors globally
- Two-stage external certification audit (6-8 weeks)
Key Differences
| Aspect | WEEE | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | EEE waste management, collection, treatment, recycling | Business continuity management system, disruption resilience |
| Industry | Electronics producers, all sizes, EU/EEA Member States | All sectors worldwide, any organization size |
| Nature | Binding EU directive, national transposition, mandatory | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Reporting, collection rate verification, national audits | BIA, exercises, internal/external audits, certification |
| Penalties | National fines, enforcement, market restrictions | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WEEE and ISO 22301
WEEE FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance
Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UL Certification vs COBIT
UL Certification vs COBIT: Compare safety marks (Listed/Recognized), testing & audits vs IT governance framework w/ design factors & maturity models. Boost compliance & risk mgmt today!
PRINCE2 vs HITRUST CSF
PRINCE2 vs HITRUST CSF: Compare governance-driven project management with certifiable security controls. Uncover principles, processes, maturity scoring & compliance paths. Boost success—read now!
NIS2 vs J-SOX
Compare NIS2 vs J-SOX: EU cybersecurity boosts resilience with strict reporting & fines up to 2% turnover; Japan's ICFR regime demands ITGC for listed firms. Ensure compliance now!