WEEE
EU directive for e-waste collection and recycling
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance
Quick Verdict
WEEE mandates EU-wide e-waste management for electronics producers via EPR and collection targets, while MAS TRM guides Singapore FIs on technology/cyber risks with governance and resilience controls. Organizations adopt WEEE for legal compliance and circularity; MAS TRM for supervisory approval and operational security.
WEEE
Directive 2012/19/EU on WEEE
Key Features
- Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) financing model
- Open scope covering all EEE in 6 categories
- 65% POM or 85% generated collection targets
- Mandatory one-for-one distributor take-back
- Selective depollution and recovery standards
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability for TRM
- Proportional risk-based control implementation
- Comprehensive third-party risk management
- Defence-in-depth cyber controls and resilience
- Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WEEE Details
What It Is
Directive 2012/19/EU, the recast WEEE Directive, is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). It mandates prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery to minimize environmental risks and recover critical materials, applying an open scope since 2018 covering all EEE in 6 categories.
Key Components
- **Producer obligationsregistration, reporting EEE placed on market (POM), financing via PROs.
- **Collection targets65% average POM or 85% WEEE generated.
- **Treatment standardsselective depollution (Annex II), storage rules.
- **Distributor dutiesfree one-for-one take-back, small WEEE acceptance.
- National transposition with harmonized reporting (e.g., 2019/290).
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids fines and market bans; enables circular economy via material recovery; reduces risks from illegal exports; supports Green Deal goals, enhancing reputation and supply security.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, multi-country registration, PRO joining, data systems integration, reverse logistics. Applies to producers/importers EU-wide; audits via national registers. No central certification, but data-driven enforcement.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines from Singapore's Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). This risk-based framework targets financial institutions (FIs) to govern and control technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportional implementation based on risk profile, complexity, and exposure across governance, operations, cybersecurity, and resilience.
Key Components
- Core pillars: governance, asset management, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access control, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, testing, and audit (15 sections).
- 12 synthesized principles like board accountability, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
- No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes for confidentiality, integrity, availability (CIA).
- Compliance via supervisory review, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for MAS-regulated FIs to avoid fines, license actions.
- Enhances resilience, reduces systemic risks, builds trust.
- Integrates with ERM, supports digital transformation securely.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance setup, asset inventory, risk assessment, controls, testing.
- Applies to banks, insurers, fintechs in Singapore; scalable by size.
- Requires board-approved strategy, independent assurance, no certification but audit evidence essential. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | WEEE | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | EEE lifecycle: collection, treatment, recycling, producer responsibility | Technology/cyber risks: governance, resilience, cybersecurity controls |
| Industry | All producers of electrical/electronic equipment, EU-wide | Financial institutions (banks, insurers), Singapore-specific |
| Nature | Binding EU Directive, transposed nationally, mandatory compliance | Supervisory guidelines, proportional implementation, enforcement via supervision |
| Testing | Treatment/recovery verification, no mandated cyber testing | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans, DR tests, red teaming |
| Penalties | National fines, enforcement varies by Member State | Supervisory fines, license conditions, executive prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WEEE and MAS TRM
WEEE FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs ISO 22000
Discover AEO vs ISO 22000: Compare customs security certification with food safety management standards. Gain insights on benefits, requirements & supply chain optimization. Choose wisely now!
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs APRA CPS 234
Compare MLPS 2.0 vs APRA CPS 234: China's graded cyber regime vs Australia's financial security std. Unlock key differences, compliance strategies & insights now.
ISO 14064 vs ISO 26000
Compare ISO 14064 GHG standards vs ISO 26000 social responsibility guidance. Uncover key differences in quantification, verification & broad SR principles for sustainability success.