What is the primary objective of WELL?

**WELL's primary objective is to create buildings and spaces that optimize human health and well-being through performance-based design, operations, and policies.** It translates evidence-based research into 10 core concepts like Air, Water, and Mind, emphasizing measurable indoor environmental quality outcomes such as CO₂ levels below 900 ppm and verified thermal comfort.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with WELL?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with WELL, as it is a voluntary certification standard.** It is adopted by building owners, developers, and operators in commercial, residential, and public sectors seeking competitive differentiation, tenant attraction, and ESG alignment; over billions of square feet globally certified.

Does WELL require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, WELL requires third-party documentation review and on-site performance verification by authorized agents.** This includes two rounds of review (preliminary and final) plus testing for air, water, light, sound, and thermal parameters, distinguishing it from documentation-only programs.

How often should an assessment for WELL be performed?

**WELL certification requires recertification every three years with annual reporting for certain features.** Ongoing assessments via continuous monitoring (e.g., CO₂, PM2.5) and occupant surveys support compliance, with performance verification during recertification cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with WELL?

**Non-compliance with WELL results in certification denial or revocation, with no legal penalties as it is voluntary.** Organizations face reputational risks, lost market differentiation, potential tenant churn, and missed ESG benefits like higher rents (up to 7.7% premium cited).

Can WELL be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, WELL provides official crosswalks to frameworks like LEED for streamlined dual certification.** These mappings align overlapping strategies in air quality, materials, and energy, reducing duplicative documentation and verification efforts.

What is the first step to begin implementing WELL?

**The first step is project enrollment in the IWBI digital platform followed by scorecard development.** Conduct a gap analysis against the 10 concepts, prioritizing Preconditions, and assemble a cross-functional team including facilities, HR, and WELL APs.

What is the primary objective of 23 NYCRR 500?

**23 NYCRR 500 establishes minimum cybersecurity standards to protect nonpublic information and ensure operational integrity for New York financial services entities.** Adopted in 2017 with 2023 amendments, it mandates risk-based programs addressing governance, technical controls like **MFA** and encryption, **TPSP** oversight, testing, and 72-hour incident reporting to safeguard against cyber threats from nation-states and criminals.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with 23 NYCRR 500?

**23 NYCRR 500 applies to all Covered Entities licensed or operating under NY Banking, Insurance, or Financial Services Law.** This includes state-chartered banks, insurers, mortgage brokers, virtual currency licensees, HMOs, and NY branches of foreign banks handling **NPI**. Limited exemptions exist for small entities (<10 employees, <$5M NY revenue), but core obligations like risk assessments remain; **Class A** companies face enhanced requirements.

Does 23 NYCRR 500 require an external audit or third-party certification?

**23 NYCRR 500 does not require external audits for all entities, but Class A companies must undergo independent audits.** NYDFS conducts examinations; annual **CEO/CISO certification** (April 15) with 5-year evidence retention substitutes formal certification. **TPSPs** provide attestations like SOC 2, but Covered Entities retain oversight responsibility.

How often should an assessment for 23 NYCRR 500 be performed?

**Risk assessments under 23 NYCRR 500 must be conducted annually and updated upon material changes.** **Penetration testing** is annual, vulnerability assessments bi-annual (or continuous monitoring), access reviews periodic, and **CISO** board reports at least annually. Policies require ongoing reviews aligned to risk profile changes like M&A or cloud migrations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with 23 NYCRR 500?

**Non-compliance with 23 NYCRR 500 results in multimillion-dollar fines, consent orders, and remediation mandates from NYDFS.** Examples include Robinhood Crypto ($30M), OneMain Financial ($4.25M), and Healthplex ($2M) for governance failures, weak **MFA**, poor **TPSP** oversight, and delayed reporting. Senior executives face personal accountability via certifications.

Can 23 NYCRR 500 be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, 23 NYCRR 500 maps closely to NIST CSF, CRI Profile, and ISO 27001.** Its risk-based structure aligns **cybersecurity program** elements (governance, risk assessment, controls, testing) with NIST functions (Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover). Organizations use traceability matrices for integrated compliance, enhancing efficiency across frameworks.

What is the first step to begin implementing 23 NYCRR 500?

**The first step for 23 NYCRR 500 implementation is determining Covered Entity status using NYDFS flowchart.** Confirm licensing applicability, then appoint a qualified **CISO** with board access, conduct initial risk assessment on critical assets/**TPSPs**, and build evidence repository for annual certification.

WELL vs 23 NYCRR 500

Q: Does 23 NYCRR 500 require an external audit or third-party certification?

**23 NYCRR 500 does not require external audits for all entities, but Class A companies must undergo independent audits.** NYDFS conducts examinations; annual **CEO/CISO certification** (April 15) with 5-year evidence retention substitutes formal certification. **TPSPs** provide attestations like SOC 2, but Covered Entities retain oversight responsibility.

Standards Comparison

WELL

Voluntary

2014

Performance-based certification for human health in buildings

23 NYCRR 500

Mandatory

2017

NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity programs

Quick Verdict

WELL certifies healthy buildings via performance verification for global real estate, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial firms with fines. Organizations adopt WELL for ESG/tenant appeal; NYCRR 500 for regulatory compliance.

Building Health & Wellness

WELL

WELL v2 Building Standard

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
10 core concepts for occupant health outcomes
Preconditions plus point-earning Optimizations structure
Certification tiers with balanced concept minimums
Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance

Financial Services

23 NYCRR 500

23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

CEO/CISO annual dual compliance certification
72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
Qualified CISO with board-level reporting
Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access
Third-party service provider risk management

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

WELL Details

What It Is

WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its concept-based approach organizes requirements into mandatory Preconditions and optional Optimizations across 10 core areas.

Key Components

**10 conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
24 Preconditions and 102 Optimizations totaling up to 110 points.
Built on public health research and building science.
**Certification modelBronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept minimums at higher tiers; requires documentation review and on-site verification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives occupant health, productivity, and ESG reporting; complements LEED for people-first outcomes. Reduces risks like poor IEQ; boosts rents, retention, and reputation via verified metrics.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, scorecard development, design/operations alignment, third-party review, performance testing at 50% occupancy. Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes; recertifies every 3 years.

23 NYCRR 500 Details

What It Is

23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a mandatory state-level regulation for financial services entities. Its primary purpose is to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and ensure operational resilience against cyber threats, employing a risk-based approach with prescriptive elements like MFA and incident reporting.

Key Components

14 core requirements: cybersecurity program, policies, CISO governance, access controls, risk assessments, TPSP oversight, MFA, asset management, encryption, penetration testing, training, audit trails, incident response, and notifications.
Annual CEO/CISO dual certification by April 15, with 5-year evidence retention.
Enhanced rules for Class A companies (>$20M NY revenue + thresholds). Aligned with NIST CSF.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate for NY-licensed banks, insurers, avoiding multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
Improves governance, vendor risk, incident readiness; reduces breach probability.
Builds trust, lowers insurance costs, enables market differentiation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess coverage, appoint CISO, risk assessment, deploy controls (MFA, PAM), test, certify.
Targets NY financial entities; NYDFS exams, no universal certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	WELL	23 NYCRR 500
Scope	Occupant health, IEQ, wellness concepts	Cybersecurity, data protection, incident response
Industry	All buildings, global, any organization	NY financial services, state-regulated entities
Nature	Voluntary performance certification	Mandatory regulation with enforcement
Testing	On-site PV, continuous monitoring optional	Annual pen tests, vulnerability assessments
Penalties	Loss of certification, no fines	Multi-million fines, consent orders

Scope

WELL

Occupant health, IEQ, wellness concepts

23 NYCRR 500

Cybersecurity, data protection, incident response

Industry

WELL

All buildings, global, any organization

23 NYCRR 500

NY financial services, state-regulated entities

Nature

WELL

Voluntary performance certification

23 NYCRR 500

Mandatory regulation with enforcement

Testing

WELL

On-site PV, continuous monitoring optional

23 NYCRR 500

Annual pen tests, vulnerability assessments

Penalties

WELL

Loss of certification, no fines

23 NYCRR 500

Multi-million fines, consent orders

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WELL and 23 NYCRR 500

WELL FAQ

23 NYCRR 500 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 22301 vs ISO 41001

ISO 22301 vs ISO 41001: BCMS resilience protects ops from disruptions (22301), FM optimizes facilities sustainably (41001). HLS-aligned for IMS. Boost continuity—compare now!

ENERGY STAR vs ISO 55001

Compare ENERGY STAR vs ISO 55001: efficiency labeling for products/buildings vs asset lifecycle governance. Maximize savings, compliance & value. Discover which drives your goals!

RoHS vs ISO 27017

RoHS vs ISO 27017: Compare EEE hazardous substance limits (10 restricted materials, exemptions, IEC testing) with cloud security controls for CSPs/CSCs. Master compliance for market access & data protection.