Standards Comparison

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Certification framework for occupant health and well-being in buildings

    VS

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global framework for sustainability impact reporting

    Quick Verdict

    WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance testing, while GRI enables sustainability impact reporting through materiality assessments. Companies adopt WELL for health-focused differentiation and GRI for stakeholder accountability and ESG compliance.

    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
    • Preconditions pass/fail plus point-based Optimizations
    • 10 core concepts for occupant health domains
    • Certification tiers Bronze to Platinum with balances
    • Continuous monitoring pathways for ongoing compliance
    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Modular Universal, Sector, and Topic Standards
    • Impact-based materiality assessment process
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for verifiability
    • Value chain disclosures including suppliers
    • Interoperable with SASB and regulatory frameworks

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach uses 10 core concepts like Air, Water, and Mind, with mandatory Preconditions and optional Optimizations for scoring.

    Key Components

    • 24 Preconditions (pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations across Air, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community, plus Innovation.
    • **Certification tiersBronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept balance rules.
    • Built on public health research; requires on-site verification and continuous monitoring options.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives occupant productivity, reduces absenteeism, enhances ESG reporting, and boosts rents/asset value. Voluntary but complements LEED for dual benefits; manages health risks and builds stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, third-party verification, operations. Applies to new/existing buildings across industries; involves cross-functional teams, pre-testing, recertification every 3 years.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards are the world's most used sustainability reporting framework. They enable organizations to disclose significant impacts on economy, environment, and people using an impact-centric materiality approach, prioritizing actual/potential effects over financial materiality alone.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics): Baseline requirements including principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability.
    • **Sector StandardsLikely material topics for high-impact sectors (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
    • **Topic StandardsSpecific metrics/disclosures (e.g., GRI 403: Occupational Health & Safety). Compliance via modular "in accordance" reporting with mandatory GRI Content Index; no formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives accountability, comparability, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD), stakeholder trust. Benefits include risk management, benchmarking, investor appeal via SASB interoperability, and operational improvements in HES.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: executive alignment, materiality assessment (GRI 3), data architecture, disclosures, assurance. Applies to all sizes/sectors/geographies; voluntary but assurance-ready for audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WELL
    Building design, operations, occupant health/well-being
    GRI
    Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people

    Industry

    WELL
    All building types globally, new/existing
    GRI
    All industries/sectors worldwide, any organization

    Nature

    WELL
    Voluntary performance-based certification
    GRI
    Voluntary modular reporting standards

    Testing

    WELL
    Mandatory on-site performance verification/testing
    GRI
    Documentation review, optional external assurance

    Penalties

    WELL
    Certification denial/revocation, no legal penalties
    GRI
    No penalties, reputational/regulatory risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WELL and GRI

    WELL FAQ

    GRI FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages