Standards Comparison

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Certification for occupant health in built environments

    VS

    ISO 26000

    Voluntary
    2010

    International guidance standard for social responsibility.

    Quick Verdict

    WELL certifies building health via verified performance testing for real estate, while ISO 26000 guides broad social responsibility integration for all organizations. Companies adopt WELL for occupant wellness credibility, ISO 26000 for ethical governance and stakeholder trust.

    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months
    Social Responsibility

    ISO 26000

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Seven principles underpinning all SR activities
    • Seven interconnected core subjects for holistic coverage
    • Non-certifiable guidance applicable to all organizations
    • Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
    • Integration into existing management systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach emphasizes measurable occupant outcomes via 10 core concepts (Air, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community) plus Innovation.

    Key Components

    • 24 Preconditions (mandatory pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations (point-earning).
    • Concept-based structure with balanced scoring rules.
    • On-site performance verification including testing for air, water, light, sound, thermal comfort.
    • Certification tiers: Bronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with minimums per concept.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives productivity gains, talent retention, higher rents, and ESG reporting. Mitigates health risks, complements LEED for holistic sustainability. Builds stakeholder trust via verified outcomes.

    Implementation Overview

    Multi-phase: gap analysis, scorecard development, documentation review, on-site testing, recertification every 3 years. Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries globally. Requires cross-functional teams, continuous monitoring.

    ISO 26000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility is a non-certifiable international standard providing holistic guidance for organizations to integrate social responsibility (SR). Applicable to all organization types regardless of size, location, or sector, it uses a principles-based, stakeholder-driven approach focused on impacts, risks, and expectations.

    Key Components

    • **Seven core principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
    • **Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
    • Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; no requirements, thus no certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust.
    • Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI for credible ESG reporting.
    • Drives operational resilience, competitive differentiation, talent retention without certification burdens.

    Implementation Overview

    • Contextual prioritization via stakeholder engagement and materiality assessments.
    • Integrate into governance, strategy, operations; phased approach (gap analysis, policy development, training, reporting).
    • Universal applicability; self-assessed progress with transparent communication.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WELL
    Occupant health/well-being in buildings (10 concepts: Air, Water, etc.)
    ISO 26000
    Broad social responsibility (7 core subjects: governance, human rights, etc.)

    Industry

    WELL
    Buildings/real estate (offices, residential, hospitality globally)
    ISO 26000
    All organizations/sectors worldwide (public, private, non-profits)

    Nature

    WELL
    Performance-based certification (Preconditions + Optimizations)
    ISO 26000
    Non-certifiable voluntary guidance (principles + core subjects)

    Testing

    WELL
    Mandatory on-site performance verification/testing by agents
    ISO 26000
    No formal testing; self-assessment/stakeholder engagement

    Penalties

    WELL
    No certification if fail verification/recertification
    ISO 26000
    No penalties (voluntary guidance, no enforcement)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WELL and ISO 26000

    WELL FAQ

    ISO 26000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages