Standards Comparison

    APPI

    Mandatory
    2003

    Japan's primary regulation for personal data protection

    VS

    AS9120B

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace QMS standard for distributors ensuring traceability.

    Quick Verdict

    APPI mandates privacy protections for Japanese data handlers with consent and breach rules, while AS9120B is a voluntary QMS certification for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention. Organizations adopt APPI for legal compliance, AS9120B for supply chain access.

    Data Privacy

    APPI

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial scope for foreign businesses targeting Japan
    • Pseudonymously processed information enables flexible analytics
    • Explicit consent required for sensitive data transfers
    • PPC fines up to ¥100 million for violations
    • Four-category security measures systematically, human, physical, technical
    Quality Management

    AS9120B

    AS9120B Quality Management Systems - Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
    • Enhanced traceability for split lots and chain-of-custody
    • Risk-based external provider controls and flowdown
    • Configuration management in distribution operations
    • Product safety and ethical behavior awareness

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    APPI Details

    What It Is

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) is Japan's cornerstone data protection regulation, enacted in 2003 with major amendments in 2022-2024. It governs handling of personal data identifying individuals, balancing privacy safeguards with digital economy needs. Scope covers businesses processing Japanese residents' data, with extraterritorial reach for foreign entities targeting Japan. Adopts risk-based approach emphasizing consent, security, and data subject rights.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, security.
    • Pseudonymously processed information for analytics flexibility.
    • Sensitive data protections requiring explicit consent.
    • **Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, objection.
    • Enforcement by Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC) with ¥100M fines. No certification model; compliance via self-assessments, audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for data handlers; avoids PPC fines, reputational damage. Builds consumer trust (78% prefer compliant brands), enables cross-border transfers via SCCs. Yields efficiency (15-25% cost reductions), competitive edges in tech, e-commerce, finance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased 12-24 month framework: gap analysis, governance design, technical controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes, industries handling personal data in Japan. Involves data mapping, DPO appointment, vendor DPAs; PPC audits for large firms.

    AS9120B Details

    What It Is

    AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aerospace distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It targets organizations procuring, storing, and reselling parts without alteration, emphasizing risk-based thinking to address distribution risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

    Key Components

    • Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements in Clauses 4-10.
    • Core areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, counterfeit prevention, supplier controls), evaluation, improvement.
    • Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, not full manual.
    • Certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
    • Mitigates risks of nonconformities, counterfeits, legal liabilities.
    • Enhances market access (2,442 global certifications), efficiency, customer trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
    • Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
    • Involves cross-functional teams, internal audits, management reviews for certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    APPI
    Personal data protection, consent, security, rights
    AS9120B
    Aerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention

    Industry

    APPI
    All data-handling sectors, Japan-focused, global reach
    AS9120B
    Aerospace distributors, aviation/space/defense, global

    Nature

    APPI
    Mandatory privacy law, PPC enforcement
    AS9120B
    Voluntary QMS certification standard

    Testing

    APPI
    Self-assessments, PPC audits/inspections
    AS9120B
    Internal audits, third-party certification audits

    Penalties

    APPI
    ¥100M fines, imprisonment for breaches
    AS9120B
    Loss of certification, market exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about APPI and AS9120B

    APPI FAQ

    AS9120B FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages