Standards Comparison

    APPI

    Mandatory
    2003

    Japan's regulation for personal data protection compliance

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global certification framework for sustainable built environments

    Quick Verdict

    APPI mandates privacy protection for Japanese data handlers via consent and security, while BREEAM voluntarily certifies sustainable buildings through credits and audits. Companies adopt APPI for legal compliance and BREEAM for ESG value and market premium.

    Data Privacy

    APPI

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial scope for foreign businesses targeting Japan
    • Pseudonymously processed information enables flexible data analytics
    • Explicit consent required for sensitive data transfers
    • Broad personal information definition includes biometrics and cookies
    • PPC enforcement with fines up to ¥100 million
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring with category weightings
    • Third-party BRE certification and audits
    • 10 core sustainability assessment categories
    • Lifecycle schemes for new, in-use, infrastructure
    • Knowledge Base Compliance Notes updates

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    APPI Details

    What It Is

    The Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), enacted in 2003 (Act No. 57) with key 2022 amendments, is Japan's national regulation governing personal data handling by businesses. It balances privacy protection with data utility via a risk-based approach, applying extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Japanese residents, enforced by the Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC).

    Key Components

    • Principles: purpose limitation, minimization, transparency, security, data subject rights (access, correction, deletion within 30 days).
    • Sensitive information (medical, racial data) requires explicit consent; no opt-out for transfers.
    • Pseudonymously processed information allows analytics flexibility.
    • Four security categories: systematic, human, physical, technical.
    • Compliance model: PPC audits, no mandatory certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for data handlers to avoid ¥100 million fines, criminal penalties, breach notifications. Builds trust (78% consumer preference), enables cross-border transfers, yields ROI via efficiency (15-25% cost reduction), competitive moats like P Mark.

    Implementation Overview

    5-phase framework (12-24 months): gap analysis, governance, technical controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries handling Japanese data; SMEs lighter, enterprises require DPOs.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a leading science-based sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology.

    Key Components

    • 10 core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
    • Credits awarded for compliance, aggregated into ratings (Pass to Outstanding ≥85%).
    • Scheme-specific manuals, KBCNs for updates, and third-party assurance via licensed assessors and BRE audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30%), and ESG alignment.
    • Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., EU Taxonomy), risk mitigation, and market differentiation.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through verified performance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification.
    • Applies globally to all sizes/industries; requires early BREEAM Assessor involvement and evidence submission for BRE QA.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    APPI
    Personal data protection and privacy
    BREEAM
    Building sustainability and environmental performance

    Industry

    APPI
    All data-handling sectors in Japan
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally

    Nature

    APPI
    Mandatory Japanese regulation with fines
    BREEAM
    Voluntary third-party certification scheme

    Testing

    APPI
    PPC audits, breach notifications, self-assessments
    BREEAM
    Licensed assessor reviews, BRE quality audits

    Penalties

    APPI
    ¥100M fines, imprisonment for violations
    BREEAM
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about APPI and BREEAM

    APPI FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages